IMDb RATING
2.5/10
1.3K
YOUR RATING
A Priest and a Vatican investigator take a possessed housewife to a convent to perform an Exorcism.A Priest and a Vatican investigator take a possessed housewife to a convent to perform an Exorcism.A Priest and a Vatican investigator take a possessed housewife to a convent to perform an Exorcism.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Anna is not screaming because she is possessed by a demon , she screams in agony how bad this actually is - same story as usual but perhaps more boring , bad acting , and very stupid - it feels like a bunch of kids hade made this.
It was the worst hour and something spent on a movie, some parts are not connected to the others. As if they wanted to add the parts and that's it!
A hell of a bad movie
The character's opening scene is very long and annoying. This has already derailed any sense of positive criticism of the film. Maybe if they had shortened that scene the movie would have been rated better, even though it was pretty weak. A lesson for producers and directors never to repeat such a gross mistake.
I believe the intention was to leave viewers agonized by the demonic interpretation of the lectern. But it was a shot in the foot.
The acting of the actors in general is weak, the script also does not contribute much to an interesting end. I was almost exorbited with so much anger from this movie, but in the end I survived.
I believe the intention was to leave viewers agonized by the demonic interpretation of the lectern. But it was a shot in the foot.
The acting of the actors in general is weak, the script also does not contribute much to an interesting end. I was almost exorbited with so much anger from this movie, but in the end I survived.
The 8 minutes of opening credits is absolutely ridiculous. Such a slow start to what could possibly be a good movie.
I try, I really do, to give these movies the benefit of the doubt. Even despite some amateurish direction, some downright sophomoric cinematography, and some horrendous acting, I try to give these movies some credit. But when you fall on the same overused, clichéd, asinine tropes found in all demonic possession films, you have to ask yourself, why do these people bother? This movie does not even attempt to do anything even remotely clever with the premise, and from the onset, you can already see what the entirety of the movie will cover. Girl is possessed, priests get "clearance" to perform exorcism, demon possesses the priests, rinse and repeat. I mean, I has been done AD NAUSEUM, to the point were I wonder what this creative team was trying to accomplish, and I have several questions;
1. Why is it always a Catholic priest that is called in? There are other religious denominations that perform exorcisms, and don't need permission to do so. At this point, it's imperative that this trope is removed, as it adds nothing to genre that The Exorcist didn't already accomplish.
2. Second, why are the special effects so shoddily done? Did you not allocate the proper funds to create believable effects? When you make a movie that requires a good use of SFX, make sure that the budget is there before you even start filming. Do not skimp out on them in order to pay your cast.
3. Lastly, why didn't anyone ask themselves, "What is this movie doing that every demonic possession film before it has not already done?" If your answer is, "nothing", as I'm sure it was, you have to re-evaluate the use of your creativity.
Stop wasting your time making these films that don't enhance or further the sub-genre. At this point, it's just embarrassing. I have no faith in the sub-genre anymore, and it's due to movies like this. To the people responsible, your efforts are worthless and do not deserve to be seen by anyone. A complete and utter failure in every sense of the word.
1. Why is it always a Catholic priest that is called in? There are other religious denominations that perform exorcisms, and don't need permission to do so. At this point, it's imperative that this trope is removed, as it adds nothing to genre that The Exorcist didn't already accomplish.
2. Second, why are the special effects so shoddily done? Did you not allocate the proper funds to create believable effects? When you make a movie that requires a good use of SFX, make sure that the budget is there before you even start filming. Do not skimp out on them in order to pay your cast.
3. Lastly, why didn't anyone ask themselves, "What is this movie doing that every demonic possession film before it has not already done?" If your answer is, "nothing", as I'm sure it was, you have to re-evaluate the use of your creativity.
Stop wasting your time making these films that don't enhance or further the sub-genre. At this point, it's just embarrassing. I have no faith in the sub-genre anymore, and it's due to movies like this. To the people responsible, your efforts are worthless and do not deserve to be seen by anyone. A complete and utter failure in every sense of the word.
Did you know
- TriviaBased on a true story that occurred in the early 1900s in Earling, Iowa. There are different accounts from many people, however there is a book entitled "Begone Satan!", which was written by Father Carl Vogl approximately 80 years ago. It was translated into English by Rev. Celestine Kapsner, and published in 1973. The book was originally a very thick pamphlet that was distributed to seminaries in the United States to familiarize priests with the destructive powers of the devil through the process of possession.
- How long is The Exorcism of Anna Ecklund?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- The Exorcism of Anna Ecklund
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $43,300
- Runtime
- 1h 19m(79 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content