IMDb RATING
2.7/10
885
YOUR RATING
Ten thousand days ago, Comet 23 struck Earth with the magnitude of all the nuclear weapons in the world sending the planet into a deep freeze. Now, 27 years in the future, those who survived... Read allTen thousand days ago, Comet 23 struck Earth with the magnitude of all the nuclear weapons in the world sending the planet into a deep freeze. Now, 27 years in the future, those who survived are locked in an epic battle of life or death.Ten thousand days ago, Comet 23 struck Earth with the magnitude of all the nuclear weapons in the world sending the planet into a deep freeze. Now, 27 years in the future, those who survived are locked in an epic battle of life or death.
Kenneth Meseroll
- Fred Hesse
- (as Ken Meseroll)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Don't waste your time with this stinker. Even John Scheider (of Dukes of Hazzard fame) can't save this film. I've heard better dialog and voice acting in high school plays.
I can't think of anything good to say, other than it had potential, but completely wasted it. Worse, it ends suddenly just as something is finally about to happen. (I was told this was episode 1 of a TV series?).
Dozens of plot holes and science/fact errors. A couple of semi-cute ladies (bundled up, sadly). Fake snow. Story involves a sudden ice age, a frozen Air Force One, flashlights powered by blood, awfully choreographed "fight" scenes, idiots who miraculously can make 50-year old frozen electronics work, and much other nonsense.
Verdict: 2 stars, barely. I've seen worse, but not often.
I can't think of anything good to say, other than it had potential, but completely wasted it. Worse, it ends suddenly just as something is finally about to happen. (I was told this was episode 1 of a TV series?).
Dozens of plot holes and science/fact errors. A couple of semi-cute ladies (bundled up, sadly). Fake snow. Story involves a sudden ice age, a frozen Air Force One, flashlights powered by blood, awfully choreographed "fight" scenes, idiots who miraculously can make 50-year old frozen electronics work, and much other nonsense.
Verdict: 2 stars, barely. I've seen worse, but not often.
10, 000 Days did have a good idea going for one, and very ambitious for a low budget movie. It also could have been fun with the right execution and if any effort was put into it, sadly that was not to be, because other than a decent performance from John Schneider there is nothing else to recommend 10,000 Days.
The acting, other than Schneider, is at best very bad. Peter Wingfield has shown he can be good, but compensates too hard, he tries to be mysterious but comes over as campy instead. The rest of the actors are so amateurish and flat that it's embarrassing. To be fair, they are not entirely to blame as they were saddled with a script that's filled with cornball moments, gibberish explanations (if you call them that) and insultingly irrational sci-fi, as well as very poorly written characters developed in a non-descript and negatively (and, for some, racially) stereotypical way.
10, 000 Days' story is very dully paced and incoherently told, with things introduced but either never resolved or even abandoned as well as things that needed explaining but never were. The movie ends far too abruptly, with an leaving-it-all-hanging effect rather than grasping the opportunity in tying up any loose ends, while it also contains some choppily edited and very poorly choreographed fight scenes. People have said that 10, 000 Days felt like a failed TV pilot, something that I wholeheartedly agree with, and it was to be honest a concept that would have worked better as a TV series, the movie just left things too underdeveloped and unexplained.
It's a cheap-looking movie as well, shot in a drab and unfocused way and the special effects are laughably bad, and even worse than that in some points (like at the beginning). The music is largely uninteresting, and there is very little competence in the direction. Overall, liked the concept but absolutely hated the execution. 1/10 Bethany Cox
The acting, other than Schneider, is at best very bad. Peter Wingfield has shown he can be good, but compensates too hard, he tries to be mysterious but comes over as campy instead. The rest of the actors are so amateurish and flat that it's embarrassing. To be fair, they are not entirely to blame as they were saddled with a script that's filled with cornball moments, gibberish explanations (if you call them that) and insultingly irrational sci-fi, as well as very poorly written characters developed in a non-descript and negatively (and, for some, racially) stereotypical way.
10, 000 Days' story is very dully paced and incoherently told, with things introduced but either never resolved or even abandoned as well as things that needed explaining but never were. The movie ends far too abruptly, with an leaving-it-all-hanging effect rather than grasping the opportunity in tying up any loose ends, while it also contains some choppily edited and very poorly choreographed fight scenes. People have said that 10, 000 Days felt like a failed TV pilot, something that I wholeheartedly agree with, and it was to be honest a concept that would have worked better as a TV series, the movie just left things too underdeveloped and unexplained.
It's a cheap-looking movie as well, shot in a drab and unfocused way and the special effects are laughably bad, and even worse than that in some points (like at the beginning). The music is largely uninteresting, and there is very little competence in the direction. Overall, liked the concept but absolutely hated the execution. 1/10 Bethany Cox
So much promise so much of a borefest with no ending. Bad cgi, plot holes, bad directing, bad script.
IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit.
IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit IMDb still trying to force spoiler laden reviews with the new minimum character limit.
This has got to be close to one of the worse films I have ever seen and could not cope with watching all of it as it was so bad. It could have been so much better as the base storyline is not too bad. The script was very dull and amateur and the characters very weak, how it ever got released is a mystery to me.
Disjointed scenes all over the place jumped from one subject to another. I left watching it to do ironing which I hate but it was better than having to watch the rest of this film.
Don't waste your time watching it go do something more entertaining. If this film made any money I would be surprised.
Disjointed scenes all over the place jumped from one subject to another. I left watching it to do ironing which I hate but it was better than having to watch the rest of this film.
Don't waste your time watching it go do something more entertaining. If this film made any money I would be surprised.
Rats can't vomit and I can't walk out of films. Normally that's not an issue. In this case I had to remind myself of that throughout and take increasingly frequent glances at my watch to see how much time was left before I could leave while muttering "Please, please let it stop" under my breath. Poor special effects, a ridiculous storyline, appalling dialogue and terrible acting (but, to be fair, the actors really didn't stand a chance from the get go in this one). Apparently, within a generation, our future selves have divided into scientifically and technologically gifted guitar playing peace loving Eco hippies who still pray before meals and testosterone driven Ghenghis Khan ninja style combat loving Mongolian warriors who talk in suitably archaic language about their clan, fortresses, honour and the glory of battle. (Talking of ninjas the film is written and directed by Eric Small, who was the assistant director of "3 Ninjas: Knuckle Up" (1995) IMDb rating 3.9). Between them you've got what I guess the film makers would like to call a doomed romance "Romeo and Juliet" sub plot going on. I very quickly wished all of them had died in the apocalypse like apparently everyone else on CGI planet. Ninety one minutes of watching a frozen empty landscape would have been more entertaining. Sometimes a film can be so unintentionally bad that it exerts a mesmerising and highly entertaining fascination all of it's own, like watching a train wreck. This isn't one of them. The Christmas turkey has definitely come early this year. Please be kind to yourself people and stay far, far, away. There are better, more life affirming and rewarding, ways of wasting 91 minutes of your all too short existence. Book a root canal treatment and turn up early, go to your train station and deliberately miss your train, try to read a book written in a language you don't know, go shopping and leave your wallet at home, start a collection of interesting things you find on your sidewalk, go out and start saying hello to people you've never met, see how many hot dogs you can eat before you throw up ... anything but this. If you see any ratings higher than 3 then I suggest you check out just how many other ratings the reviewer has submitted. My guess would be just one, glowing, for this film and this film only. My score 1/10, simply because IMDb won't let me go any lower. For clarity, that means that "3 Ninjas: Knuckle Up" (1995) is 4 times better than this! In conclusion, just about every other film I've seen in my whole wasted movie watching life was better than this one. This is the kind of film that makes you wish film had never been invented. Finally, the "end" of the film directly suggests there will be a sequel. If there is a God ... there won't.
Postscript: 25 days later 4 reviewers have given it a 10, making it obviously one of the greatest films they have ever seen. They are either: a) Masochists who need serious help; b) Sadists who want you to suffer the way I suffered; c) in the pay of those responsible for this monstrosity; d) a combination of the former. Despite this it's still pulling a (grossly exaggerated) score of 3.7 on the crapiness index. IMDb - you really need to do something about these people!
Postscript: 25 days later 4 reviewers have given it a 10, making it obviously one of the greatest films they have ever seen. They are either: a) Masochists who need serious help; b) Sadists who want you to suffer the way I suffered; c) in the pay of those responsible for this monstrosity; d) a combination of the former. Despite this it's still pulling a (grossly exaggerated) score of 3.7 on the crapiness index. IMDb - you really need to do something about these people!
Did you know
- TriviaCopyright ©2011 10,000 Days, LLC
- GoofsThe post-apocalyptic setting sees Earth suffering from a deep freeze, with continuous snow and ice resulting in the characters wearing multiple layers of clothing because of the cold. However, at no point is the breath (vapour) of any of the characters visible.
- How long is 10,000 Days?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- 10,000 Days
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $2,500,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 31m(91 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content