Follows the journey of John and Colt, gunfighters and sometimes lovers, on parallel but very different journeys through an underground dueling culture.Follows the journey of John and Colt, gunfighters and sometimes lovers, on parallel but very different journeys through an underground dueling culture.Follows the journey of John and Colt, gunfighters and sometimes lovers, on parallel but very different journeys through an underground dueling culture.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
If you are looking for action, just forget it. There isn't any. Most of the film is uninteresting chatter. It is very slow paced and terribly boring film.
My recommendation: Skip it.
My vote: 1/10.
My recommendation: Skip it.
My vote: 1/10.
Ultimately unfulfilling, long winded movie that fails to satisfy on any level. The two leads are effective, but the plot(such as it is) is plodding. Things deteoriate even further by the time mickey rourke turns up shortly before the end.
Rourkes botched surgery is so ghastly it detracts from what little impact the weak ending might have had.
Not recommended.
Rourkes botched surgery is so ghastly it detracts from what little impact the weak ending might have had.
Not recommended.
If you get bruises, it means you felt something. For the longest times in this, it feels like ... nothing. While our main character struggles to explain what can not be explained, we get a second story line with the gorgeous and talented Freida Pinto. The ensuing love story is not the most believable you'll have seen. But it serves its purpose (killing time and establishing another character besides our main man).
Unfortunately not many things work in its favor here. The ending (which seems blurred, but I guess if you look closely enough you might be able to see something and if you still care have an opinion about it) will split the opinion many viewers will have. Rightfully so I think. Watch it if you don't expect much ...
Unfortunately not many things work in its favor here. The ending (which seems blurred, but I guess if you look closely enough you might be able to see something and if you still care have an opinion about it) will split the opinion many viewers will have. Rightfully so I think. Watch it if you don't expect much ...
No spoilers. Just an old reference.
When I was younger, there was a thing called a "shaggy dog story".
This movie has A LOT going for it. It has good character development, for example.
Good basic plot.
Good (although each mostly simple) complications to the plot.
Some elements of the action were never adequately explained.
But in the long run: too many things were not explained in the context. Many things seemed to happen with no rational motivation behind them.
They all did lead to the end... but not in any logical manner.
So, then comes the climax...
"Shaggy dog story".
When I was younger, there was a thing called a "shaggy dog story".
This movie has A LOT going for it. It has good character development, for example.
Good basic plot.
Good (although each mostly simple) complications to the plot.
Some elements of the action were never adequately explained.
But in the long run: too many things were not explained in the context. Many things seemed to happen with no rational motivation behind them.
They all did lead to the end... but not in any logical manner.
So, then comes the climax...
"Shaggy dog story".
The concept was wonderful.
A strange combination of Hard Times and Quick and the Dead, with a touch of Mad Max ... hard to mess up.
But mess up they did.
There are two schools of film criticism. The "auteur" school insists that, before taking pen to paper, you understand everything about the director and writer, to better appreciate what was intended.
The second school does not care what was intended, just what shows up on screen.
Using the yardstick from the second school, I see a film that almost goes out of its way to detract from its own power, to minimize its own kick, to alienate the audience at every opportunity.
The dialog is wretched. The direction so bad as to be perverse and peevish. Ironically Ryan Kwantan and the stunning Freida Pinto are well cast, and in the proper circumstances could have delivered the goods. But like sacrificial pawns in a chess game, their efforts are hampered at every turn.
The sound director in particular should be ashamed. The director chose for unknown reasons to have the characters speak softly all the time, possibly to generate "realism." All this generates is a headache, especially since the soundman allowed every possible noise to block out what the characters were actually saying.
This reviewer almost never looks at a film and wonders aloud how much better it would have been if the Hollywood machine had gotten hold of it...? This one is the exception to the rule.
A strange combination of Hard Times and Quick and the Dead, with a touch of Mad Max ... hard to mess up.
But mess up they did.
There are two schools of film criticism. The "auteur" school insists that, before taking pen to paper, you understand everything about the director and writer, to better appreciate what was intended.
The second school does not care what was intended, just what shows up on screen.
Using the yardstick from the second school, I see a film that almost goes out of its way to detract from its own power, to minimize its own kick, to alienate the audience at every opportunity.
The dialog is wretched. The direction so bad as to be perverse and peevish. Ironically Ryan Kwantan and the stunning Freida Pinto are well cast, and in the proper circumstances could have delivered the goods. But like sacrificial pawns in a chess game, their efforts are hampered at every turn.
The sound director in particular should be ashamed. The director chose for unknown reasons to have the characters speak softly all the time, possibly to generate "realism." All this generates is a headache, especially since the soundman allowed every possible noise to block out what the characters were actually saying.
This reviewer almost never looks at a film and wonders aloud how much better it would have been if the Hollywood machine had gotten hold of it...? This one is the exception to the rule.
Did you know
- TriviaFreda Pinto and Mickey Rourke appeared together in Immortals
- How long is Blunt Force Trauma?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Blunt Force
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $1,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $53,752
- Runtime
- 1h 37m(97 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content