IMDb RATING
6.8/10
2.9K
YOUR RATING
A story about fame, addiction and a custody battle over a man's leg.A story about fame, addiction and a custody battle over a man's leg.A story about fame, addiction and a custody battle over a man's leg.
- Awards
- 4 wins & 4 nominations total
Featured reviews
I can't fault this really stunning documentary.
When the director stumbled across the numerous eccentric characters who made up this film, I'm sure he couldn't have believed his luck.
However instead of ridiculing the characters, he sensitively lets them tell their own stories in their own way.
Make no mistake - the end result will make you laugh out loud, which is why you should watch it in a crowd. However much of the humour comes from the editing rather than cheap shots at the characters' expense, and you will find yourself respecting both them and the director.
You'll also spend much of the movie thinking you are watching a mockumentary, since most of the stars are outstandingly telegenic, and the story - well it's too bizarre to be fiction.
The soundtrack is superb, as are the editing, the direction, the way the clips are woven into a story with a history and an ending, the attention to detail, and even the camera work.
Happy to give up a couple of hours of my time to this movie, and anything else by the same director.
When the director stumbled across the numerous eccentric characters who made up this film, I'm sure he couldn't have believed his luck.
However instead of ridiculing the characters, he sensitively lets them tell their own stories in their own way.
Make no mistake - the end result will make you laugh out loud, which is why you should watch it in a crowd. However much of the humour comes from the editing rather than cheap shots at the characters' expense, and you will find yourself respecting both them and the director.
You'll also spend much of the movie thinking you are watching a mockumentary, since most of the stars are outstandingly telegenic, and the story - well it's too bizarre to be fiction.
The soundtrack is superb, as are the editing, the direction, the way the clips are woven into a story with a history and an ending, the attention to detail, and even the camera work.
Happy to give up a couple of hours of my time to this movie, and anything else by the same director.
Shannon Whisnant purchased a grill at an auction. Inside the grill was an amputated leg. What follows is a story centered on the enterprising Whisnant and John Wood, the man whose leg wound up in the grill due to an odd chain of events.
This story, by itself, is quite interesting because of the events and people involved. Shannon Whisnant is clearly crazy, with delusions of grandeur. He does not seem stupid, but clearly feels he has been slighted by the world and should be someone important. John Wood, on the other hand, is generally portrayed as the victim, but he has his own problems and from what we see in the film, he seems to have more or less thrown away a golden ticket.
A little bit deeper, there are two issues I would love to have seen more of: one, why did the doctors let Wood keep his leg? I feel like there are some biohazard issues with letting people keep rotting flesh, and the film never really got into that.
And two, I wish the issue would have gone through actual legal channels. There are some excellent legal questions involved: does the leg belong to the person who found it, just as money in a mattress would? Or is it clearly something different because it is human remains -- can you actually own part of another man? This could have been fascinating to see argued in court, but that never happens.
This story, by itself, is quite interesting because of the events and people involved. Shannon Whisnant is clearly crazy, with delusions of grandeur. He does not seem stupid, but clearly feels he has been slighted by the world and should be someone important. John Wood, on the other hand, is generally portrayed as the victim, but he has his own problems and from what we see in the film, he seems to have more or less thrown away a golden ticket.
A little bit deeper, there are two issues I would love to have seen more of: one, why did the doctors let Wood keep his leg? I feel like there are some biohazard issues with letting people keep rotting flesh, and the film never really got into that.
And two, I wish the issue would have gone through actual legal channels. There are some excellent legal questions involved: does the leg belong to the person who found it, just as money in a mattress would? Or is it clearly something different because it is human remains -- can you actually own part of another man? This could have been fascinating to see argued in court, but that never happens.
On the surface, Finders Keepers is an odd and funny look into the lives of two interesting characters from North Carolina who fight over the ownership of a severed foot /leg. Although entertaining, this documentary is much more than just an out of the ordinary situation. The deeper we get into the background of the story and its characters, we witness a struggle for fame, forgiveness and family. Issues of drug addiction and childhood trauma appear as we see a deeper story that deals with regrets and poor decisions that have created a major journey that both characters travel through. An uplifting ending helps bring closure where it is much needed. Still, the odd scenario which Finders Keepers showcase, may not find a larger audience that this documentary deserves.
There seems to be a lot of documentaries made these days, and even some movies look like doccos. The premise of Finders Keepers is odd, but the tagline/blurb of this film tells little about what it is: a weird human interest/recovery story from NC/SC. Unlike a lot of documentaries based around simple folk, the makers really draw you into responding emotionally to the characters in this one, whether it be annoyance, revulsion or admiration.
Finders Keepers has the right mix of humour, TV/news footage and one on one face camera/narrative dialogue to tell an engaging story of the media, greed, missed opportunities and redemption. The documentary makers keep the necessary distance from the subjects to allow the story to unfold naturally.
It is worth watching and talking about afterwards, especially if you are interested in embalmed feet.
Finders Keepers has the right mix of humour, TV/news footage and one on one face camera/narrative dialogue to tell an engaging story of the media, greed, missed opportunities and redemption. The documentary makers keep the necessary distance from the subjects to allow the story to unfold naturally.
It is worth watching and talking about afterwards, especially if you are interested in embalmed feet.
You all know about the popular joke about North Carolina......'If me 'n Jolene gets divorced is she still my cousin?'
Well.....................after you see this movie you'll be saying to yourself that EVERYTHING you previously heard about that state is PROBABLY true....REALLY!!
Did you know
- TriviaThe articles that appear in the film poster are written by Charlotte Observer staff writer Marcie Young Cancio who first broke the story and gave the filmmakers permission to feature her articles.
- Quotes
Shannon Whisnant: I'm pretty smart. I'm sure y'all figured that out by now. I've heard from many a folk, kin to me, and close to me, and the ones that know me. They tell me that I have the best business mind that they've ever seen.
- ConnectionsFeatures 28 jours en sursis (2000)
- SoundtracksCarmen Suite #2, Habanera - Theme 2
Performed by Bruton Music
Written by Georges Bizet
Courtesy of APM Music
- How long is Finders Keepers?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- En fot i grillen
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $35,555
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $5,740
- Sep 27, 2015
- Gross worldwide
- $35,555
- Runtime
- 1h 22m(82 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content