After cover-up was exposed by a reporter the truth was worse than you could ever imagine.
The firearm officers tell their side and why they were not be blamed.
They say, what happened in Stockwell tube was byproduct of training, and once firearms officers were in station there only goal was to take out a suspect.
The problem was the Jean Charles de Menezes was just wearing a T-shirt and light weight coat and was not the suspect.
I can't make judgement on guilt in that situation under pressure, but I can't see how he could possibly have bomb hidden under a t-shirt after seeing footage.
But I do remember once being on tube with a dodgy looking man with rucksack beard and though he might have bomb. It was scary and I had to get off the train.
The problem is fear and when communication breaks down and police fail, it was easy to blame firearms officers who have seconds to react.
This documentary talks about the policeman watching flats were failure in chain, as well as the worst quality E-fit being another one of the failures.
The words "I don't think it's him " to killing this poor man was unforgivable.
As this documentary shows Fire arms officers were found not guilty and did act as trained.
The question is, at what stage could this have been stopped.
Why, if this was the man they wanted did he make it to train putting people at risk.
The footage in this documentary show at no stage did this man act out of character and only reason he was followed was because he lived in those flats, he died like an animal for being in wrong place at wrong time, you have to say there must be some justice.
This documentary opens door for a new inquiry and justice.
