Vindicating Trump

Dinesh D'Souza has done it again. He's made another political film that will be loved by some and hated (and completely ignored) by others. It has his typical formula of mixing fact and what some might think is questionable information, wrapped up in a sensationalized story. The few movies I've seen of his do peek my interest even though I often wonder where is the proof. I do believe some of what he says is true and others I question mainly because they are so controversial. Since he doesn't prove his story beyond all doubt then it is hard to buy it all hook line and sinker. Since there will always be people who debunk or deny the validity of his facts he is always doubted. So, I take a wait and see approach. I hope future historians will shed light on the events of the last 20 some years with a less biased eye on both sides. However, even that I'm not wholly confident will ever happen. So...I wait and see. This film focused on Trump, mostly since 2015 to present, but there are a few references to before then. Unfortunately, I only heard things I already knew. There wasn't definitive proof offered. Even though I believe a lot of it I don't see anyone who doesn't believe these facts to be swayed at all. The storytelling format was "factual history" dramatized, as most of his other movies do, so it comes off as rather corny. In between the drama Dinesh acts as narrator and interviewer. There were some funny parts where I and others in the theater laughed. Since I already knew the information covered it did seem long. Probably won't see it again. Can't say I'll recommend it much because I know most people won't believe it and Dinesh can be polarizing. You either think he is a good investigator, historian and interviewer or you don't.

This is a movie well worth seeing with the Election drawing near. Dinesh D'Souza has made a movie, which tops the previous three. The use of actors to help tell the story of the Establishment's crackdown on the American people improves pacing. Casting Nick Searcy as a Democrat operative is a stroke of brilliance. The movie's dark humor is a welcome surprise. Some things could have been done better. John Wayne makes for a better Western hero than Clint Eastwood. There could have been some discussion about how deep state will be dealt with if Trump regains White House. Still an amazing film. Stay past the beginning of the closing credits.

As a lifelong educator, historian, and journalist, i occupy a world of.common sense, ethics, facts, law, logic, math, morality, rationality, reason, and science in my critical-thinking processes on what constitutes the real world around me. This moviemaker does not live in my world; he lives in some fantasy land where he can make up anything that makes him happy, get someone else to pay for the equipment, and then present it to an audience who wants to hear the same kind of "truths" that have no basis in common sense, ethics, facts, law, logic, math, morality, rationality, reason, or science. When 75 percent of modern Americans lack critical-thinking skills, this kind of "art" is what happens. Americans have a choice: enlightened citizenry as the Founding Fathers intended, or ...willful ignorance in a reality-distortion zone created of their own cognitive dissonance. This attempt at a film falls into the latter category-especially when one realizes the moviemaker was a convicted felon, pardoned by his subject. Common sense would have any rational thinker automatically reject such an attempt at moviemaking due to subjectivity and implicit bias. History and posterity is already laughing at this moviemaker.

This should be required watch for every voting age American citizen. Learn about the man and grandfather, how he sacrifices his wealth and freedom to help us citizens and the country. Learn how Democrats and their media demonize him. Learn how Democrats weaponized and corrupted the justice system to attack him, silence him, bankrupt him, and try to put him in prison. Learn undercover how the Democrats cheat to steal elections, how they buy and manufacture fraudulent and illegal mailed and drop box ballots, and ruin the integrity of our election system. Learn about Kamala Harris policies that would destroy our economy and our country.

This review is actually to point out the after election spin of a review written on oct the 6th. Just about one month before we knew which was the wind really blew.

Now the best part is carefully reading the dated narratives and assertions about authority and quality of the individuals judgment or negative things like lying.

Of course its rated a not at all unreasonable 1 out of 10.

Heck if you want an idea of how much total bs is in the ratings read about weighted ratings methods and then look at any trump content and see the vast numbers of people so dumb they still almost exclusively vote 1 or 10 thinking thats the most effective way to toss partisan skewing in under the radar.

Even the one 5 of 10 review that tries to paint itself as a review of reason. Still the deep bias is there plain to see.

Most people won't like it. That along with plenty other tale tell signs as it progresses give way to the reality this is someone with fairly strong left anti trump bias role playing some sort of reasoned moderate.

Much of the focus is to invalidate as "the proof or evidence" simply isn't there. Im sorry are there an excess of political content like this where the undeniable cited evidence and proof is always present? Like what things has he been watching and what standard does they think exists in such media?

At any rate they almost have a point until their true and clearly purposefully masked bias comes creeping to the surface comforted that they are approaching their goal and its safe to reduce the effort before reaching it.

Most of the political figures and presidents who have been assassinated or attempted tended to be actually at risk of accomplishing something.

Its interesting to think about such things like the list of popular victims or survivors of assassins. How much promise they held for the future or threat to some.

Also its important to note the kind of times general attitudes of the people and parties when no assassinations are occurring or failed attempts.

You can't kill the truth but you can bury it alive.

Now wonder about the sheer volume of noise and distraction and how quickly it has changed in nature and tone post win.

Is that really because people or scared of revenge or some totalitarian regime coming for them in the future? Or is that simply a bunch of kids realizing the jig is up and mom has called them home for dinner.