User reviews

This movie knows exactly what it is-a big, dumb comedy-and fully leans into it. The pacing is fast, the jokes keep coming, and it never really drags. Steve Zahn completely steals the show, delivering the kind of over-the-top comedic performance he does best. There's a lot of cussing, so it's definitely not family-friendly, but the humor lands more often than not. If you're looking for something smart and deep, this isn't it-but if you want a genuinely funny, turn-your-brain-off popcorn movie, this one delivers.

Anaconda (2025) may have left me a bit disappointed overall, but it still delivers enough dumb fun thanks to Jack Black and Paul Rudd to make it at least somewhat worthwhile.

This movie's been on my radar since the first teaser dropped. I'm a big fan of Jack Black and the high energy he brings to the projects he's in, and Paul Rudd has always been an actor I've enjoyed in movies.

That said, I went in with reasonable expectations for this movie and 50% of the time I got what I was looking for, and 50% of the time I was left wanting more of what was marketed.

The premise itself is actually pretty fun. Jack Black's Doug and Paul Rudd's Griff are trying to fulfill their childhood dreams by making an Anaconda reboot deep in the jungles of Brazil, until a giant anaconda shows up and turns their movie into a reality. On paper, that's a great hook and when the film actually leans into this idea, it works. The first act does a solid job setting up the characters, the story, and the tone, which honestly made me optimistic going forward.

Unfortunately, the movie starts to lose itself in a messy second act that focuses heavily on a completely unnecessary subplot that goes absolutely nowhere. This detour pulls attention away from the actual selling points and leads to some poorly written explanations as for why these events are unfolding in this story and nothing burger twists. By the time the third act rolls around, the movie goes fully over the top, but this is also where it becomes the most entertaining. It leans into that so bad it's good energy I was expecting and delivers some genuinely fun moments that properly utilize the actual anaconda and the interactions it has with our man crew.

With that said, plot wise there's definitely a lot of wasted potential here. With a tighter structure and a stronger focus on its core ideas, this could've been way better. Still, it manages to deliver some entertaining scenes and even sneaks in a decent message, all while having fun with its parody elements.

Where the movie really gains its footing is in the performances. Jack Black and Paul Rudd are clearly having a blast, and that enthusiasm is what carries the film. When the movie actually commits to its premise watching these two compliment each other in increasingly ridiculous situations is easily the highlight. Steve Zahn is also pretty funny here, with some laugh out loud moments.

Overall, this meta reboot of Anaconda has plenty of shortcomings, no question. But thanks to its cast, it ends up being more fun-bad than just flat-out bad.

I have an affinity for movies set in exotic locations. I have no interest in going anywhere near the Amazon Rainforest at any stage in my life, so I enjoy it vicariously through film. I wasn't really sure what to expect from 'Anaconda', and even though it was a little messy and needed to correct the ship a few times, it found its way to being a pretty entertaining 99 minutes.

The cast make this movie almost impossible to hate. Four of the most likable people working today, all playing great characters that suit them perfectly. It really is the spine that holds the movie together, even when it's threatening to fall off the rails.

The plot is so-so. I get that you need a reason for these normal people to venture out to the Amazon, and it works in that sense, but it doesn't lead to as much fun as you'd hope. I also could've done without the side-story involving the criminals. It dragged the film down a bit and didn't add much.

The actual horror involving the snake was interesting. If the director was asked on a scale of 1-10 how aggressive he wanted it to be, he definitely said 15. Also the jump scares are extremely loud and vigorous. Be ready for that.

There's a great scene in this movie involving a spider bite and what happens after. It's the kind of thing that comedy movies used to be riddled with and it was so good to venture back to what felt like the good old days. A very funny scene indeed.

I had a pretty good time with this movie. It works as a horror and it works as a comedy. It finds a good balance between the two. 7/10.

The humor works, the timing is on point, and the movie knows when to be funny without trying too hard.

There are a lot of moments that genuinely make you laugh, not forced jokes, just natural comedy that flows well.

The pacing is good, and it stays entertaining from start to finish.

For me, it's an easy 8/10 - funny, enjoyable, and definitely one of the comedy highlights of the year.

Anaconda is a reboot of the 1997 film of the same name. This reboot is directed, co-written, and produced by Tom Gormican, director of The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent.

Ronald Griffin Jr. (Paul Rudd) is an actor who has never managed to break through in the film industry and only lands small supporting roles. His former friend Doug McCallister (Jack Black) once tried to make it as a director, but now only directs wedding videos. As teenagers, the two used to make films together for fun.

Ronald believes they can make a reboot of their old fan film Anaconda together. With a small group of friends, they travel to the Amazon, convinced they can shoot this reboot on a limited budget using a few stunts. However, when they are confronted with a real anaconda during filming, their fan film suddenly turns into a genuine survival movie.

With this reboot, the creators attempt to turn the 1997 horror monster film into a comedy. This shift in genre may take some getting used to, even given the relatively poor quality of the original Anaconda and its many sequels. The later Anaconda films were already low-quality enough to be unintentionally humorous.

This reboot largely comes across as a straight comedy, pushing the horror and monster elements into the background. This may be jarring for fans of the original films and also attracts a different kind of audience. The problem with the comedy, however, is that the filmmakers do not seem to know what kind of humor they want to use. Parody, meta-humor, and spoof elements are mixed together, making the film feel messy and difficult to follow rather than genuinely funny.

In addition to the chaotic comedy, the story itself is also incoherent. Some characters seem to exist solely to move the plot forward and then disappear, only to suddenly reappear later. The film attempts to explore a theme of missed opportunities, but this is overshadowed by the jumble of comedic styles.

The visual effects in this reboot rely entirely on CGI, causing the anaconda to never feel truly believable. Moreover, the snake does not appear until late in the film, at times making it feel like an entirely different movie rather than an Anaconda reboot. In the original film, at least animatronic effects were used, which made the anaconda feel more convincing on screen.

Due to the film's messy structure, the cast members are also unable to stand out, making it difficult for viewers to genuinely care about the characters.

Anaconda is a decent reboot that works best when it embraces its parody tone. The setup is clean, the CGI snake looks better than expected, and the jungle atmosphere helps sell the danger. Unfortunately, the movie doesn't feature the anaconda as much as it should, and the pacing slows between attacks. The characters are serviceable but forgettable, and the ending is predictable, though intentionally so. Overall, it's a solid but uneven creature feature that's more amusing than thrilling.

Anaconda slithers onto the with a lot of noise and very little substance. What could have been alot of fun,and a good tense creature feature but instead it turns into a very dull and very messy experience that feels more like a cash grab for Jack black and Paul Rudd than a movie with any real vision.

The story is painfully predictable, the script is awful and the acting is mediocre the Characters are thinly written and mostly forgettable, making it hard to care who survives or what happens next.

The Dialogue often feels awkward and forced, as if it exists only to move the plot along.

The visual effects are another major letdown the snake was very poor.

The CGI For a new 2025 release itself looks surprisingly unconvincing, frequently pulling you out of the movie instead of immersing you in it. The visuals were actually better from the 1997 version there's to much overuse of shaky camera work,loud sound and silly dialogue and ridiculous cameos which are not needed for this movie. It's not a remake but a new take on the anaconda version in 1997 which was actually much better than this one.

This film was like a horrible fever dream that I couldn't escape. The last 45 minutes was almost torture to sit through. Juvenile doesn't even cut it for how silly and low brow the jokes became.

The set up portion of the film was mildly entertaining. I was almost enjoying myself in wondering what stupid hijinks the cast was going to get up to, but it seemed that every joke, and every plot beat kept doubling down on it's own stupidity. A lot of it seemed ad-libbed from the actors, and the more dumb humor got, the less fun the film became.

There's also problems with the editing, the film seems to jump here and there like scenes are missing or maybe they never got made at all. It made for a very disjointed experience in an already low film.

Now, here is my biggest issue with the film. If you are going to have cameos from actors of the original film, DO SOMETHING WITH THEM!!! This was a complete embarrassment with the way the creators handled this. Heavy handed wouldn't be enough to describe how bad the cameos are. One of many shames this film brings on itself.

Overall, I kind of hated it. Easily in my 3 worst films of 2025. I love the cast, but it's not enough for this lazy and, frankly, embarrassing attempt at a remake, or reboot, or spoof, or whatever you want to call this. I call it garbage. Save your time and money. Thank me later.

1 Anaconda out of 5.

This was an absolute joy of a movie. Don't we need some really stupid fun right now to take our mind of the disaster happening in this country? I see some reviews on here criticizing this film as if it's a serious sequel. People, it's a comedy spoof. It's kitsch nostalgia with a ton of laughs. Relax and have a good time.

Snakes alive, what a total bust this reptilian retread is...

Thought i'd 'tentatively' check it out because Jack Black can be funny and the original 1997 'Anaconda' was a 'so bad it's good' kinda flick, but this bizarre 'homage' to it is an epic fail from start to finish.

First up the piece takes ages to actually get going as we have to endure half an hour of tiresome character backstory set in Buffalo!

The small ensemble comedic cast (Black, Zahn, Rudd and Thandie Newton) finally heads to the Amazon where the slithery shenanigans don't take long to rear their ridiculously over-sized head. Thereafter there's lots of mindless running around, shouting, explosions and bizarre interweaving of the film-within-a-film premise.. odd;y there's also not that much footage featuring the enormous Anaconda itself!

With a superfluous side plot about illegal gold-mining thrown in for good measure everything leads up to an ott finale that's as predictable as a snake shedding its skin and then - mercifully it's all over. The end credits are cool though.

The only saving graces are the nice location cinematography, some decent music, an inevitable cameo or two and a couple of genuine laughs (the wild boar scene is funny), but overall this ridiculous reboot is as pointless as over-watering the Amazon plant life. Why does this rubbish even get green-lit. Sad as...

Paul rudd walks out from the Marvel franchise to co-star in a disaster. That's Anaconda for us all. An illogical script brought together to make a ride of chills, shrieks and kills. Stretched to offer comedy in it's own reign, This Anaconda works terribly bad in story building. The trailers made more sense than the movie. The giant legend looked like an elastic snake, hunting the stars in a comical board game like the famous 'Snakes & Ladders'. Cameos welcomed Icecube among many. Disappointed to not see Jennifer Lopez, but glad to not see her in a dull, silly, over the wall act.

Not going to bury the lead...this was terrible! I had very low expectations for this movie and it was even worse than what I was expecting. I am not a Jack Black fan at all and somehow he was even worse in this. Why does he think he needs to sing in every movie?! I do enjoy Paul Rudd's work but he was also terrible and so was the rest of the cast. It tried so hard to be funny and didn't succeed once. They even wasted the two "surprise" cameos. I was rooting for the anaconda to eat the whole cast so this movie would be over! But just because I hated this doesn't mean you cause all film is subjective!

By The Numbers breakdown: Cast-10 Acting-3 Trailer-4 Ending-3 Story-3 Visuals-6 Direction-3 Sound-9 Genre-4 Sub Genre-4 The Faces For Radio score - 49.

Instead of being a straightforward creature feature, Anaconda (2025) reboots the franchise in an entertainingly meta fashion that contains enough heart and humour to comfortably sustain the film's ideal 100 minute run time. This feels like a throwback to the studio comedies released in the 2000s because it captures their look and feel nicely with a particular affection for Tropic Thunder since it has a similar premise and Jack Black.

Jack Black and Paul Rudd have an endearing on screen friendship as they both play to their strengths. Paul Rudd always remains likeable even when his character is at his most flawed and Jack Black brings a lot of enthusiasm from his first appearance. Thandiwe Newton, Steve Zahn and Selton Mello all get some great moments to shine but Daniela Melchior barely gets anything to do thanks to how consistently closed off her character is.

After a very weak opening that lacks any of the necessary tension it's trying to create, Tom Gormican's direction quickly becomes a lot more capable when fully embracing the comedy with a few knowing jokes about big budget filmmaking as well as broader ones which usually land. Anything involving the pretty good looking CGI snake gets the job done and shooting in a real jungle will never not be the best decision for this type of film.

I suppose I should say at the outset of the review that Anaconda (2025) was intentionally a low-brow, silly film with no aspirations beyond that from the get-go. As such, in a way the flick is to a degree review-proof in terms of a critical assessment. I mean, the whole premise of it is ridiculous, so pointing out plot holes, leaps in logic and the like is sort of futile.

As a movie, Anaconda (2025) is at more than a few times confused as to what kind of film it was trying to be. There's a secondary, supposedly serious subplot involving gold poachers that was woven into the main storyline which I found more distracting than anything else. I found the main plot involving the four lifetime friends now in middle age trying to recapture the failed dreams of their teenage years was a decent-enough premise.

I would agree with other reviewers that as a viewer thinking too heavily about what you are seeing when you watch Anaconda (2025) undoubtedly inhibits enjoying it, so definitely turn your brain off and laugh as one reviewer wisely said.

Even with all that, for myself I didn't find the laughs exactly coming at me hard and fast, comedy being subjective. Part of that may have to do with going way back never having quite purchased a ticket on the Jack Black train in terms of my perception of his comedic ability, and Anaconda (2025) has a LOT of Jack Black front and center. Another part of that may have to do with the many jarring tonal shifts Anaconda (2025) takes throughout, trying to be this sort of wistful, sweet, silly yet at times serious, scary, thrilling Comedy/Action/Adventure hybrid. Anaconda (2025) really doesn't pull this blending of elements off particularly well.

However, I will also say that there were several scenes that did make me laugh out loud and a few sudden scare shots that made me jump. None of which were gut-bustingly funny or on-the-edge-of-my-seat thrilling, but effective enough. In truth, I hadn't wanted to see this flick and as such went into it with very low expectations. By all the criterion I listed above, Anaconda (2025) basically made it over the lowered bar. I saw it yesterday, so I figured I'd write this review today because doubtless come tomorrow I won't even remember having seen it, such is the disposable nature of it. It is what it is and overall a semi-decent one of those.

LIKES: Fast-Paced Fun Jokes Simple Entertainment Cameos Are Fun The Music Is Enjoyable It's Just Funny Summary: Anaconda is not here to tell a complex story, and therefore, the pace is not working to be this balanced, story masterpiece. It's a brisk pace for the fleeting attention span with loads of flash in the pan elements to give this adventure film that adventurous pace. The simplistic story is supported heavily with comedy and seems to be a jungle of jokes that take the form of many styles. Meta humor is a big card they played, making fun of Hollywood tactics by mirroring those tactics and poking fun at them. Slapstick humor is prominent, often leading to more banter as the cast of middle-aged movie makers pursues various interests in their impromptu trip to the most dangerous jungle in the world. One-liners, clever puns, and nods to nostalgia are all ready and waiting for you in this film, alongside some cameos that may be short-lived, but add their own charm and humor, which I enjoyed the most. Musically, I'm a sucker for a killer track list, and Anaconda is ready to hit you with a lot of styles that are matched with the scenes to levels that again synergize to enhance each other. What's the verdict of the likes... the movie is stupid fun, and in a movie... that works sometimes for just escaping the cruelties in the world. Anaconda is that escape, and with the cast bringing their acting strengths of silliness to full swing, I think you'll have a blast so long as you come in with the expectation of dumb fun and laughs.

DISLIKES: The Plot Is Meh The CGI Needs Work Character Development Needs Work It's Not Scary Lacks A Lot Of Snake Time/Terror Too Silly?

Summary: Just because you might expect a silly film, doesn't mean it doesn't come with limitations for a movie overall. Anaconda's plot is very limited. It's trying to put this new approach to the film, which sort of works, but then tries to integrate a few more serious plot points in the movie that are a distraction, extra, and feel somewhat hastily developed. Character development feels too caught up in the meta humor, and so many of the lines are drenched in the exaggerated presentation and sitcom-level enunciation that it feels even less necessary. It leads to characters that are somewhat one-dimensional, boring, and not so much worthy of investing in outside of the laughs. The CGI needs work, too. Don't get me wrong, they are crafting something I couldn't begin to make, but it also has that cheesy SyFy channel look in animation, textures, and comical anthropomorphic elements. I didn't hate it, and there is a good chance this was the goal, but in this day of technical prowess, not the direction I would go. If you are hoping that you were going to get that horror, adventure, and creature film, then lower the expectations now. This Anaconda tries to bring that hunted element, but it's minimal, drowned out by the comedic delivery element as we get bombarded with joke after joke. Not having that scare/danger element makes this movie boring, and the terror I wanted in some parts felt very minimal. The snake doesn't even get that much time, and the kill count is surprisingly low for a movie of this caliber. Those elements were very much needed, but given the trailers promising such a silly film, I can't say I'm surprised this big snake is more of a comedic guest star to the live-action cast. Thus, was the film too silly that it hurt the movie? I have to say yes.

The VERDICT: Anaconda is a film that promises an escape, and you are getting that escape. It's simple fun, unapologetic in the jokes it unleashes in this barrage of humorous vaudeville of movie-making in the Amazon Rainforest. The songs are fun, the humor is just mind candy, and it moves at a pace that should be very rewarding to a lot of people who don't want to think too hard for a movie. And despite the fun I had, the movie did need to rein in the comedy a bit and try to develop a little more depth to its plots and characters. Anaconda's remake has too many odd attempts at plots, and lacking that hunter element took the excitement out of this series that SyFy had mastered for so many years. Without that thrilling element, so many of the new directions got either stale or felt out of place, leading to a film that feels chaotic, contrived, and diluted to be a holiday release. Would I recommend a theater visit? No, I can't say it is, sadly, unless you just need that escapism. My scores for this film are:

Action/Adventure/Comedy: 6.5-7.0 Movie Overall: 5.5-6.0.

Anaconda (2025) takes a very different approach from what many fans might expect, leaning heavily into comedy rather than attempting to revive the franchise as a straight-up creature feature. While the original Anaconda was never critically beloved, it carried a certain tension and campy menace that made it memorable. This new version seems aware of that reputation and instead chooses to parody itself, using humor and exaggerated scenarios as its primary driving force.

Paul Rudd and Jack Black headline the film, but surprisingly, their chemistry doesn't fully ignite. Both actors are known for their comedic timing and screen presence, yet here they feel oddly restrained, almost as if the script never allows them to fully commit. The humor skews more toward corny and cheesy than genuinely laugh-out-loud funny, which makes the film feel safe rather than daring. The intention to be comedic is clear, but the execution rarely lands with impact.

The screenplay is one of the film's biggest issues. Tonally, it feels disjointed, bouncing between homage, parody, and half-hearted horror without ever settling into a confident identity. This lack of focus makes it difficult to stay fully invested, as the story never builds real suspense or meaningful momentum. Even when the film hints at danger, it quickly undercuts itself with humor that feels forced rather than organic.

Visually, the CGI is a major drawback. The snakes, particularly the primary anaconda, look artificial and overly massive to the point of distraction. Instead of feeling threatening, the creature often comes across as cartoonish, which further diminishes any sense of danger. Compared to modern creature features, the effects feel underdeveloped and rushed.

That said, the film isn't entirely without charm. The supporting cast manages to bring some energy, and there's a late-film moment that taps into nostalgia in a surprisingly effective way. It briefly reminds viewers why the franchise once held appeal. Ultimately, Anaconda (2025) isn't a complete failure, but it's far from a revival. It's a mildly entertaining, forgettable experience that works best as a casual, at-home watch rather than something worth seeking out in theaters.

This movie was horrid, i like jack black and paul rudd,,,,but this movie had NOTHING TO offer whatsoever,,,maybe the kiddos will laugh a little by actors being silly,,but it will be rare, as they didnt even do that well, the script, the acting, the movie is cringe.....we need films like this to be stop being made ,,,covid's over there is no excuse. And this movie made me feel like i had covid again. It moves really fast, but i laughed once,,,and its a sell out wrapped in a bow.

This new version of Anaconda is sold as a horror comedy meant to make us laugh while also fearing its iconic villain, the giant snake. The truth is that the film isn't a complete disaster, but it falls well short of what it promises.

Anaconda starts on the wrong foot. Daniela Melchior, a Portuguese actress I genuinely like, is cast as a Brazilian character, complete with an accent that caused more secondhand embarrassment than immersion. It makes you wonder if Brazilian actors are so rare that the production simply gave up looking. It's a baffling decision that feels lazy and poorly thought out.

Narratively, the film takes far too long to get going. A large portion of the runtime is spent debating whether the characters will film a remake of Anaconda in the Amazon. We already know they will. That's the premise. All this buildup is pointless and exhausting, and at least half of it could have been cut without harming the film. Only when the story finally reaches the Amazon does it gain a bit of momentum.

Even then, the scenes with the Anaconda, which should be the film's main attraction, are rarely tense. The mix of comedy and horror barely works. The humor fires in every direction, occasionally landing a decent joke, but often slipping into pure cringe. Tension is almost nonexistent, with the film constantly choosing to play it safe instead of taking risks.

The cast is one of the film's strongest elements. Paul Rudd, Jack Black, and Steve Zahn manage to carry much of the movie with their charisma and fun performances, making it more watchable even when the material lets them down.

Overall, Anaconda suffers from a dragged-out beginning and a lack of impact, tension, and a clear identity. Still, it's not a bad film. It works as a light comedy, includes a few fun nods to the original, and even leaves the door open for a sequel.

This is very much a "lazy Sunday afternoon" movie, best watched with low expectations and on streaming rather than in theaters. If this movie were a snake, it would hiss a lot... but rarely bite.

I never saw the original, but I would be willing to bet money that it wasn't as stupid as this one. If you've seen the trailer, you've seen the movie and you should expect no more than that. I was hoping to have some stupid, brainless, entertainment, and instead got a bland, poorly presented movie that did not satisfy my need for a laugh. In all honesty, there was only one scene that even made me smile once and that involved body humor. You'll know what I mean if you see the movie. Other than that, don't waste your time or money on this one. Let it slither and slide on by.

This felt like a film school film from the start and never really changed. Jack black, Paul Rudd, and Steve Zahn all are super funny, but not in this really.

I did not expect much going into this, I thought it would be like Ed helms Vacation. I felt stupider watching this. There wasn't much laughter in the audience. Definitely a few funny moments, but not enough to justify the hard watch.

Greetings again from the darkness. Longtime movie lovers usually cringe with announcements regarding movie remakes. Of course, some work out pretty well: A STAR IS BORN (2018), THE THING (1982), TRUE GRIT (2010); while others deserve backlash: PSYCHO 91998), ROLLERBALL (2002), THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (2003). When the news hit that writer-director Tom Gormican (THE UNBEARABLE WEIGHT OF MASSIVE TALENT, 2022) was going to remake ANACONDA (1997), it wasn't so much a cringe reaction as it was a giant question mark ... Why remake a movie that on its best day could only be labeled a fringe cult favorite? Once the leads of Jack Black (after Nic Cage dropped out) and Paul Rudd were announced, it made much more sense. This was to be a comedic take on an original film that featured quite a few accidental comedy elements.

This latest take revolves around four lifelong friends stuck in mid-life limbo, searching for meaning. Doug (Jack Black), Griff (Paul Rudd), Kenny (Steve Zahn), and Claire (Thandiwe Newton) made a movie together as kids, and Griff discovered the VHS tape at his mom's house. Watching their work as youngsters ignites the desire to recreate the passion they once had. The solution is obvious (to them): remake ANACONDA!

They head to the Amazon and almost immediately are unknowingly caught up in a gold crime ring where a key player, Ana (Daniela Melchior, ROAD HOUSE, 2024) winds up captaining the boat they chartered for the river work. Also on the boat is Santiago (Selton Mello (I'M STILL HERE, 2024), a snake handler who brings along his pet as the titular character. As you might imagine, the whole thing turns into quite an ordeal and yes, there is a giant snake who feasts on humans (like in the original).

Director Gormican co-wrote the script with Kevin Etten, and rather than tongue-in-cheek, they go full-on comedic reimagining of the original 1997 film written by Hans Bauer, Jim Cash, Jack Epps Jr. Paying additional homage to that film, there are mentions of Jennifer Lopez, Eric Stoltz, and a wisecrack about Jon Voight's confusing accent. I'll admit that I don't always find the genius in this type of comedy, but I found myself laughing more often than not at some of the outrageous escapades ... likely due to the talents of the lead actors (Zahn especially has some zingers). You likely know already whether this one will appeal to you, so enjoy ... or not.

Opens in theaters on Christmas Day 2025.

Sadly we live in an era of pervertions. We get films showing childhood heroes like popeye, mickey and cinderella as serial killers and now we get horror icons like anaconda snakes to present them like they are comedians and people laught when they see the biggest and deadly snakes in the world. When u deal with anaconda snakes u can only deliver a horror film like the first 1997 effort was that's why that film got praised. Now what they were thinking ? That people who want a comedy will go to see the anaconda ? Have they lost it 4 good ? Bad jokes and ackward situations happenning in the whole of the film i wish a real anaconda snake should intervene and show to all those beeps that nobody is jocking when it comes to the deadliest snake in the world. When they are gonna learn ?

With the new streaming a.i services coming out next year ( Disney first ) your going to find that studios won't gamble $200 million on a movie for it to tank at the box office when they can play it safe charge the consumer $200 a month and they can make whatever they want .. the Jurassic Park Prequel Pitch trailer on YouTube is the proper use of A. I . ( concept )

This anaconda 2025 movie is a prime example of a lack of ideas from a studio for a mainstream audience .