21-Century
Joined Sep 2025
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings57
21-Century's rating
Reviews45
21-Century's rating
The film Saipan,is about Roy Keane & Mick McCarthy's 2002 World Cup fallout,its critically acclaimed for its performances and from actors Steve Coogan & Hardwicke it's quite a balancing drama with some comedy and in some scenes there are aspects of which both characters actually needing anger management,It taps into the universal themes of ego and conflict between these two people though it over prioritizes emotion over strictness it's a very compelling watch even for you non football supporters , I praised its soundtrack and and it's directing, making it for me highly recommended for an Irish sports storytelling drama This is a serious and a very respectful film that focuses more on emotions .
It may not appeal to viewers looking for fast-paced combat throughout, but for those interested in football history and character-driven storytelling then this is a powerful and memorable experience.
It may not appeal to viewers looking for fast-paced combat throughout, but for those interested in football history and character-driven storytelling then this is a powerful and memorable experience.
Anaconda slithers onto the with a lot of noise and very little substance. What could have been alot of fun,and a good tense creature feature but instead it turns into a very dull and very messy experience that feels more like a cash grab for Jack black and Paul Rudd than a movie with any real vision.
The story is painfully predictable, the script is awful and the acting is mediocre the Characters are thinly written and mostly forgettable, making it hard to care who survives or what happens next.
The Dialogue often feels awkward and forced, as if it exists only to move the plot along.
The visual effects are another major letdown the snake was very poor.
The CGI For a new 2025 release itself looks surprisingly unconvincing, frequently pulling you out of the movie instead of immersing you in it. The visuals were actually better from the 1997 version there's to much overuse of shaky camera work,loud sound and silly dialogue and ridiculous cameos which are not needed for this movie. It's not a remake but a new take on the anaconda version in 1997 which was actually much better than this one.
The story is painfully predictable, the script is awful and the acting is mediocre the Characters are thinly written and mostly forgettable, making it hard to care who survives or what happens next.
The Dialogue often feels awkward and forced, as if it exists only to move the plot along.
The visual effects are another major letdown the snake was very poor.
The CGI For a new 2025 release itself looks surprisingly unconvincing, frequently pulling you out of the movie instead of immersing you in it. The visuals were actually better from the 1997 version there's to much overuse of shaky camera work,loud sound and silly dialogue and ridiculous cameos which are not needed for this movie. It's not a remake but a new take on the anaconda version in 1997 which was actually much better than this one.
This movie definitely expands the world of Pandora with confidence and ambition, proving that the franchise still has fresh ground on its massive franchise with still another two movies to be made ,
This is the third installment of the franchise which 100% delivers a visually arresting, emotionally sharper chapter of avatar that deepens even further into its saga in all its meaningful ways.
Visually, the film is stunning even by Avatar standards.
The introduction of volcanic and ash-covered regions of Pandora adds a striking contrast to the lush forests and oceans seen before. Fire-lit landscapes, lava drifting embers, and its new biomes feel alive and carefully imagined, reinforcing James Cameron's unmatched commitment to world-building which ticks all the boxes. The visual effects are not just spectacle-they serve the story and its mood, often reflecting the growing tension and moral ambiguity at the heart of the .
Fire and Ash takes a more darker, storyline and more of a complex approach to the sullys.
The story occasionally slows a little bit under the weight of its many plots, but all the strong character moments in this movie keep it grounded. There are Familiar characters who evolve in the most believable ways, while new faces definitely add depth rather than distraction.
The runtime is just over three hours long and may test some people at the cinema ,Still the emotional payoff and thematic focus helps the film land its most important moments and it was a superb movie and by far the best for CGI special effects,battle sequences ,and the direction from James Cameron ,this has to be one of the best movies of 2025.
Visually, the film is stunning even by Avatar standards.
The introduction of volcanic and ash-covered regions of Pandora adds a striking contrast to the lush forests and oceans seen before. Fire-lit landscapes, lava drifting embers, and its new biomes feel alive and carefully imagined, reinforcing James Cameron's unmatched commitment to world-building which ticks all the boxes. The visual effects are not just spectacle-they serve the story and its mood, often reflecting the growing tension and moral ambiguity at the heart of the .
Fire and Ash takes a more darker, storyline and more of a complex approach to the sullys.
The story occasionally slows a little bit under the weight of its many plots, but all the strong character moments in this movie keep it grounded. There are Familiar characters who evolve in the most believable ways, while new faces definitely add depth rather than distraction.
The runtime is just over three hours long and may test some people at the cinema ,Still the emotional payoff and thematic focus helps the film land its most important moments and it was a superb movie and by far the best for CGI special effects,battle sequences ,and the direction from James Cameron ,this has to be one of the best movies of 2025.
Insights
21-Century's rating