Expert analysis recreates real-world disasters in 3D graphics to uncover hidden causes like paperwork errors, bad glue jobs, or changed restaurant hours. "Disaster Autopsy" dissects disaster... Read allExpert analysis recreates real-world disasters in 3D graphics to uncover hidden causes like paperwork errors, bad glue jobs, or changed restaurant hours. "Disaster Autopsy" dissects disasters, peeling back layers and freezing time.Expert analysis recreates real-world disasters in 3D graphics to uncover hidden causes like paperwork errors, bad glue jobs, or changed restaurant hours. "Disaster Autopsy" dissects disasters, peeling back layers and freezing time.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
As I started to watch my rating for this show just kept dropping. Who's bright idea to add a fake 3d display. Oh those poor people, hey pretend you are rotating it, ok now pretend to look interested.
In many cases they showed something on the fake 3d table, but never the full shot for the viewer, so if you watch on a smaller screen you are missing any detail they are showing.
This gimmick sucks, since you already have the 3d models, it would have been better to have an actual screen where they can pinch, zoom and rotate in real time.
If there is a 2nd season of this, which I wouldn't mind, please junk the fake 3d thing. It looks goofy and it is extremely distracting. Whoever decided hey this is brilliant needs to be fired and never allowed to touch a production again.
In many cases they showed something on the fake 3d table, but never the full shot for the viewer, so if you watch on a smaller screen you are missing any detail they are showing.
This gimmick sucks, since you already have the 3d models, it would have been better to have an actual screen where they can pinch, zoom and rotate in real time.
If there is a 2nd season of this, which I wouldn't mind, please junk the fake 3d thing. It looks goofy and it is extremely distracting. Whoever decided hey this is brilliant needs to be fired and never allowed to touch a production again.
Treats it viewers like we're dumb. Also, disingenuous. For example, with the Columbia disaster, it was known from the very start of the mission what had hit the wing, and they spend so much time playing dumb being like "is it this" making it seem like that's how the actual investigation went. They start the episode with a straight up lie that the mission had gone well, when in fact people on the ground were spending the entire mission trying to figure out how the wing strike would affect reentry.
Also the weird table thing. Just show us the animation, no need to see random people in the background of it, they're just distracting.
Also the weird table thing. Just show us the animation, no need to see random people in the background of it, they're just distracting.
I enjoy SHOWs like this - they are exactly what they are - SHOWs - aimed at telling the horrible and even sometimes boring story of what happened, in a more 'entertaining' fashion. Yes, there are sometimes hiccups and inconsistencies in animations and details - nothing in this world is ever perfect in execution. However, most reviewers today, seem to feel obligated to vent their own 'expert' opinions (no doubt gained by themselves through many many years of television production and forensic science experience), upon the producers and cast. What they seem to conveniently forget, is that this is, at the end of the day, an "entertainment" show. If one wants to watch the exact, dry, unvarnished truth, of any situation then one must realise that this will result in a 27second show where someone says 'The wheel failed because the metal fatigued, which caused the train to derail killing x number of people and injuring x number of others'. That is the exact, factually correct version, of an incident, which reviewers seem to be expecting, but which unfortunately, will not make a full tv show.
The shots of the professionals (very knowledgeable people) examining computer generated images and/or pretending to control the recreation is extremely annoying. For one, there's far too many of these shots. Secondly, the people aren't really looking at anything so it's rather pointless to include shots of them pretending they are. Other then that it's a decent show. Only 5 stars though for this glaring and extremely ignorant inclusion that makes the show nearly unwatchable. Watch with your eyes closed or have it on the background while doing something else. Also, occasional explanations of items that are already well know (an airplane needs speed to generate lift) as if the viewers are stupid.
The show does a good job of analyzing various disasters, with a number of 'experts' offering their opinions of what might have caused the event to take place. However, the shows presents these experts as looking over some sort of (non existent) holographic table on which CGI images have later been superimposed, to make it look like like that is what the experts are seeing. The experts are also interviewed siting on stools which are clearly in front of some green screen on which a computer image is projected of a warehouse of some sort, perhaps to give it an air of industrialized importance. Often, multiple 'experts' are shown simultaneously peering intently at where the graphics are to be added later, when very likely there is only one of them filmed at a time and they are then added together later in editing. Alas, these shenanigans do take away from the show.
Did you know
- TriviaAll episodes of Season 1 were available on Disney+ and Hulu (NatGeo On Demand) on 8/17/2024. The first two episodes were show on broadcast TV on 8/17/2024...with one episode broadcast each week from 8/24 through 9/28/2024. Eight episodes in total.
Details
- Release date
- Also known as
- Katastrofy pod drobnohľadom
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content