The Jokesters

I literally fell asleep twice watching this movie through

Prime example of why an untalented producer shouldn't star in his own movie.

Absolute waste of time, Nathan Reid should find something else to do with his life or really needs someone to tell him how bad he really is.

Theres really nothing good to say about this awfull piece of crap.

Totally agree with the review by hairdude where he states "The worst of them all is the self loving writer/actor Nathan Reid who is so lame and over acting it's painful to watch!"

The only reason why I gave this two stars is because Nathan Reid is in it. The rest of the movie was a complete flop in my opinion no more the acting was below subpar the writing of the script left so much to be desired they acted like they were high school kids rather than in their 20s getting ready for a wedding. Don't waste your time or energy on this picture unless you like Nathan Reid.

Pranksters being hella annoying, at best, for 35 minutes. Seriously, they were unbearable.

Then we walk right into assault as these funny guys steal a stanger's top and drive off with it, leaving her topless at a store. Because jokes and pranks.

Worse still, they film the first very private moments of a couple's honeymoon. For the yucks.

Nothing is funny, it's pure torture. We kept watching ONLY hoping that some chainsaw massacering would happen to all the men in this film.

We couldn't make it to the end. The actors, director, writer...everyone involved should just crawl into a cave and starve to death. That would be way funnier.

WORST thing I've ever seen.

I'm so ashamed that I actually sat through this movie that as punishment to myself I created an IMDb account and forced myself to review it so that everyone would know. The real injustice here is that the money spent to produce this movie could have been used instead to get a genocidal child-raping Eco-terrorist a decent lawyer. The painful dialogue was reminiscent of being trapped on a school bus full of eight year-old boys on a sugar rush. The camera work -- mostly on its side -- redefined the words "disjointed", "nausea-inducing", and "sub-amateur". The acting was slightly better, but the actors must have been pranked by their agents into taking the roles. Comparing this to "Cabin in the Woods" is only accurate insofar as there is a cabin in the movie, and it is in the woods. Its only redeeming feature is that it is only 80 minutes long. I am hoping the planned sequel is -80 minutes so I can get my time back.