IMDb RATING
3.7/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
Three treasure hunters searching for Saxon gold stumble upon mysterious aerial phenomena. When darkness descends and their equipment malfunctions, they face an otherworldly threat in the sam... Read allThree treasure hunters searching for Saxon gold stumble upon mysterious aerial phenomena. When darkness descends and their equipment malfunctions, they face an otherworldly threat in the same area as a historic UFO case.Three treasure hunters searching for Saxon gold stumble upon mysterious aerial phenomena. When darkness descends and their equipment malfunctions, they face an otherworldly threat in the same area as a historic UFO case.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Photos
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Prepare yourself for about an hour and a half of awful camera-work that is all over the place and just downright annoying. And prepare yourself for an hour and a half of virtually nothing happening aside from three people pretending to be lost in the Woods and then finding an old abandoned hangar.
There are no words that will do justice to the extent of which I loathe this genre of movies; the mockumentary and found footage genre. If you have seen one of them then you have essentially seen all.
I will say that the lights in the sky, as shown in "Hangar 10", was quite good and interesting, and that was actually the best part of the entire movie.
With just three people on the cast list, there was a tremendous performance pressure resting on their shoulders. I will say that the actors and actress did manage to do good enough jobs with the limitations of their limited script.
Once the movie actually manages to shamble to an ending, you just sit there left behind with a foul taste in your mouth, robbed of 83 minutes of living and you just go mmm-hmmmm.
"Hangar 10" is not worth wasting your time or money on. I did it so you don't have to. If you enjoy Sci-Fi or UFO/extraterrestrial lore, stay well clear of this movie.
There are no words that will do justice to the extent of which I loathe this genre of movies; the mockumentary and found footage genre. If you have seen one of them then you have essentially seen all.
I will say that the lights in the sky, as shown in "Hangar 10", was quite good and interesting, and that was actually the best part of the entire movie.
With just three people on the cast list, there was a tremendous performance pressure resting on their shoulders. I will say that the actors and actress did manage to do good enough jobs with the limitations of their limited script.
Once the movie actually manages to shamble to an ending, you just sit there left behind with a foul taste in your mouth, robbed of 83 minutes of living and you just go mmm-hmmmm.
"Hangar 10" is not worth wasting your time or money on. I did it so you don't have to. If you enjoy Sci-Fi or UFO/extraterrestrial lore, stay well clear of this movie.
This has to be the worst found footage film of all time. It's boring. It's slow. It's all over the place. Terrible camera work. Cheap Effects. Bad Acting.
This is an insult to the Rendlesham Forest Incident.
UFO stuff should be scary and have an atmosphere to them, this Hangar 10 garbage has none, not one sign of it.
I have to say again the camera work is terrible, its so shaky, they should not of let the clueless actors hold the camera. What you see on screen is the result of people that have no idea of how to handle a camera.
Don't bother with this so called film, it sucks and more so.
Mike.
This is an insult to the Rendlesham Forest Incident.
UFO stuff should be scary and have an atmosphere to them, this Hangar 10 garbage has none, not one sign of it.
I have to say again the camera work is terrible, its so shaky, they should not of let the clueless actors hold the camera. What you see on screen is the result of people that have no idea of how to handle a camera.
Don't bother with this so called film, it sucks and more so.
Mike.
There is an easy way to sum up this movie. Say you have a budget of $2,000US and you live near a field. All you need to do is buy a $50 camera at Walmart, ask your friends, "Hey want to be in a Movie and be Famous?" and Adobe CS5.
For the movie run around in the fields and record yourselves screaming for one hour. Then put the video on you laptop and edit.
WAALAA! Instant sensation! Make a commercial of the movie and only show the audience getting scared. Then make a scary cover for you DVD.
Let the sheep buy it! On a lighter note, this is a terrible terrible movie. Please don't torture your eyes and waste your time watching it. Go outside for an hour instead and thank God your alive...
For the movie run around in the fields and record yourselves screaming for one hour. Then put the video on you laptop and edit.
WAALAA! Instant sensation! Make a commercial of the movie and only show the audience getting scared. Then make a scary cover for you DVD.
Let the sheep buy it! On a lighter note, this is a terrible terrible movie. Please don't torture your eyes and waste your time watching it. Go outside for an hour instead and thank God your alive...
I had read somewhere Hangar 10 had something to do with Severance (the excellent Brit comedy/horror) therefore I was expecting the same director, or writer perhaps, I think I was wrong. First off the acting isn't too bad and the story line is not entirely off point. Too much time most certainly is spent in the woods however and a meandering atmosphere soon sets in. It's obvious the found footage style is here to stay however a real drawback in this movie was the extent of it and the implementation - I really had enough of it. To the point it detracted from the movie unfortunately, and this movie does gain momentum towards the end so that was quite a shame. You'd have to be a real hardcore Sci-Fi fan and not mind headache inducing camera work to enjoy, which is a shame as I think the ingredients were there for an enjoyable movie but did not make it for me. As a comparison Probability of girlfriend enjoying District 9- 100% Hangar 10- 0%.
I am typically a fan of found footage movies, especially if they are well done. This one was not.
I was very excited to watch Hangar 10, as I enjoy a good UFO/alien movie. What a disappointment!
I spent most of this movie wondering what the hell was going on. The reason why they were in the woods and their reasoning for doing things was not made very clear. The accents were thick which did not help matters at all.
Overall, the movie was slow and boring, and two of the actors spent half the movie yelling "Gus!!!" which got pretty old.
Unfortunately, all Hangar 10 did for me was waste two hours of my life that I can never get back.
I was very excited to watch Hangar 10, as I enjoy a good UFO/alien movie. What a disappointment!
I spent most of this movie wondering what the hell was going on. The reason why they were in the woods and their reasoning for doing things was not made very clear. The accents were thick which did not help matters at all.
Overall, the movie was slow and boring, and two of the actors spent half the movie yelling "Gus!!!" which got pretty old.
Unfortunately, all Hangar 10 did for me was waste two hours of my life that I can never get back.
Did you know
- TriviaThis film is also known as "the Rendlesham UFO incident"
- GoofsWhen they are in the forest they are there illegally. they go at night so they won't be seen but then use torches and talk in rather loud voices. This defeats the object of going at night.
- ConnectionsFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Alien Movies That Were Based on True Events (2021)
- How long is Hangar 10?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- The Rendlesham UFO Incident
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 27m(87 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content