Judge Karen Mills Francis whom is best known from her previous shows "Judge Karen" and "Judge Karen's Court" comes back with an all new show which involves her listening to small claims cour... Read allJudge Karen Mills Francis whom is best known from her previous shows "Judge Karen" and "Judge Karen's Court" comes back with an all new show which involves her listening to small claims court cases.Judge Karen Mills Francis whom is best known from her previous shows "Judge Karen" and "Judge Karen's Court" comes back with an all new show which involves her listening to small claims court cases.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
I don't know if you have blood sugar problems or what but STOP YELLING at the people! This accomplishes nothing and really gets on the viewers nerves. You say you need to eat lunch well for goodness sake, stop filming and eat! You are making a total fool of yourself! The man that trains birds could not get a sentence out without you interrupting him. He looked at you like you have lost your mind and guess what? He is right. You need to see a doctor. Normal people do not rant like that> Especially educated women that have been appointed judgeships. I will pray for you. The way she fans herself makes me think she has a medical problem that needs to be addressed. She is a smart woman and she did not act like this several years ago when she first came on TV. She should see a doctor or the station she make her check out her health. she acts like a idiot ranting and raving for no reason. She chilled out for a few months when ppl posted on Facebook that she acted like a nut. Maybe she will see this and do something to help herself. I mean no harm I used to like the show but I can not watch a woman holler at litigants anymore.
I've never understood the "my courtroom" attitude, condescension and disdain some/most of these tv judges exhibit...as though their job is a favor to the litigant. I don't generally take issue with her rulings; I DO find her to be rude, dramatic, condescending, patronizing.. I can go on. The courtroom is dramatic itself without the extras...maybe it's necessary for ratings, but Mathis is even MORE dramatic, entertaining and loads more respectful doing it. You leave with your dignity in tact .. unless you try to play him. Then you leave in pieces. Sis can learn from a brotha. I think she's the one who says purpose of court is to make you whole or restore you to wholeness or some such. You don't do that awarding damages but damaging individuals in the process.
I have been watching Judge Karen for a few months now and find that many of her rulings are not only unjust, but defy logic and integrity. She yells, ridicules and gives people bad advice. In the show today Judge Karen told a young man to disassociate with his mother and called him a Momma's Boy. Where is the honor and respect for a parent, whether you agree with what she did or not? For her to tell the son not to bother with his mother and to embarrass her in court that way was inexcusable. Because a son loves his mother or listens to her wise advice does not make him a Momma's Boy. You could see he agreed with his mother, yet Judge Karen still made fun of him and called them both names. How mean to try and separate a mother and son. It is not her role as a judge to ruin people's lives. She should not be a judge nor be on TV. This is the last show I'll be watching.
I am really interested in watching court shows. I watch Judge Mathis, Judge Ross, Judge Milian, Judge Judy, and more recently Judge Jerry. Most of those Judges are very intelligent and gain experience and knowledge as time goes by. They are organized and have certain ways of doing their work to best come to a verdict or decision. Judge Karen is very different in the way she does her job. I do not know how she comes to her conclusion. It seems she does not know what she is doing. Her verdicts seem to be off the majority of the time. Whatever she does to help herself in determining an outcome she needs to stop and find a new way of doing things. She needs to listen to litigants and focus on what they say. Other great judges speak out loud to themselves to better try to visualize both parties or litigants situation that brought them to court. A good Judge in my eyes puts themselves in the eyes of both parties and has great communication. Judge Karen seems to think she is too good for that and cares more how she looks in the public's eyes, which backfires and makes her act and become non-professional. She needs to learn that having a real gavel does not make her high and mighty. I really want to hear the other Judges reviews of her and suggestions to her. I cannot watch her she because it literally makes me sick how she can be. Her courtroom is a circus and is an insult to others that take their Career serious. I am starting to believe that the guests in the show are there as punishment, and she should understand that most people laugh at her not with her.
So I just watched a show in which she ruled in favor of the defendant in back to back cases. The first case the caterer broke the customers dining table and it would cost $250 to fix but the customer also signed a contract to pay $650 for the food which was served and enjoyed. The caterer sued for the $650, which he was denied and in turn made to pay $250. In reality and actual justice the defendant should have paid $400, not the $650 sued for. He won $250 plus a free dinner for 40 guests. Stupid.
The second one she allowed a lady that killed a man's trained falcon, which a golf course hired to rid them of problem ducks, to go without being held responsible for the man's $10000 loss and business loss. The lady said at the end, "I'll take a duck over a falcon any day." So stupid. Not even the point. She killed a majestic bird because she felt it was horrific that a bird was killing a bird. So the judge basically agreed that it's legit to kill a bird to show that it's wrong for a bird to kill a bird.
You never see real judge shows totally dismissing the original legitimate claim in favor of absurd defense, but here you see it back to back and it just pisses you off enough for a person,me, who doesn't write show reviews, ever, to get online, sign up for an account, and go through the trouble to make people aware so as not to waste their own time on watching this quack judgery*.
Total bullshit People.
*my awesomely created word that should be included in the next edition of Websters.
The second one she allowed a lady that killed a man's trained falcon, which a golf course hired to rid them of problem ducks, to go without being held responsible for the man's $10000 loss and business loss. The lady said at the end, "I'll take a duck over a falcon any day." So stupid. Not even the point. She killed a majestic bird because she felt it was horrific that a bird was killing a bird. So the judge basically agreed that it's legit to kill a bird to show that it's wrong for a bird to kill a bird.
You never see real judge shows totally dismissing the original legitimate claim in favor of absurd defense, but here you see it back to back and it just pisses you off enough for a person,me, who doesn't write show reviews, ever, to get online, sign up for an account, and go through the trouble to make people aware so as not to waste their own time on watching this quack judgery*.
Total bullshit People.
*my awesomely created word that should be included in the next edition of Websters.
Did you know
- TriviaJudge Karen Mills presides over small-claims court arbitrations.
- How many seasons does Supreme Justice with Judge Karen have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content