Bookish
- TV Series
- 2025–
Gabriel Book, proprietor of an antiquarian bookshop, relies on his vast collection to unravel baffling cases. He nurtures a group of lovable yet troubled individuals, providing informal prot... Read allGabriel Book, proprietor of an antiquarian bookshop, relies on his vast collection to unravel baffling cases. He nurtures a group of lovable yet troubled individuals, providing informal protection and guidance.Gabriel Book, proprietor of an antiquarian bookshop, relies on his vast collection to unravel baffling cases. He nurtures a group of lovable yet troubled individuals, providing informal protection and guidance.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
I must admit that I had been looking forward to this debuting from the moment I found out of its existence.
I was not disappointed.
I love the characters. Book and Trottie are a wonderful couple, tender and loving. But at the risk of divulging spoilers, I shall say no more on that.
At the time of writing I have only 'binged' four of the six episodes (why are there not more?!). The supporting cast are equally compelling, hinting at depths not yet explored.
The cinematography, direction, set and costume design are all superb.
The storylines are well thought out, with allusions of other famous whodunnits, but with spins on them that only bring them to light during the denouement.
Gatiss is a superb writer, like all of his works he knows his subject matter and he sprinkles Easter eggs and nods throughout whilst creating something truly original.
I am sad that only six episodes have been made. So far. The series, the characters, the mysteries, deserve many, many more outings. If there is any justice, we will see Book and co. Again.
10/10.
I was not disappointed.
I love the characters. Book and Trottie are a wonderful couple, tender and loving. But at the risk of divulging spoilers, I shall say no more on that.
At the time of writing I have only 'binged' four of the six episodes (why are there not more?!). The supporting cast are equally compelling, hinting at depths not yet explored.
The cinematography, direction, set and costume design are all superb.
The storylines are well thought out, with allusions of other famous whodunnits, but with spins on them that only bring them to light during the denouement.
Gatiss is a superb writer, like all of his works he knows his subject matter and he sprinkles Easter eggs and nods throughout whilst creating something truly original.
I am sad that only six episodes have been made. So far. The series, the characters, the mysteries, deserve many, many more outings. If there is any justice, we will see Book and co. Again.
10/10.
I find very climactic the already well-known British device of presenting the episodes with an initial sequence apparently not related to the main timeline, but whose relevance will later be revealed (see Vera, Endeavour and many etcs.) This is, to me, the 'antipasto' for a most palatable 'crime dinnertime'.
I warn against the not-very-realistic reviews of people who don't even deign themselves to watch a full first episode and, based on a few minutes of hasty viewing, mark poorly a whole season or the show altogether. If you will take the time and trouble to write a review, at least take the time and trouble to see the whole season first. Otherwise, what worth is there in assessing something you haven't actually watched?
For those who have really watched Bookish, the experience seems to have been delightful. And Mark Gatiss plus Polly Walker, what a fantastic cast. A crowd-pleaser of course, but always delivering!
I liked the atmosphere, the bookish thing in itself, the character development and the 'magnetic' traction of the show, which drew myself in from the very beginning. So what else can I do other than recommend it, especially for those lovers of British crime series.
I warn against the not-very-realistic reviews of people who don't even deign themselves to watch a full first episode and, based on a few minutes of hasty viewing, mark poorly a whole season or the show altogether. If you will take the time and trouble to write a review, at least take the time and trouble to see the whole season first. Otherwise, what worth is there in assessing something you haven't actually watched?
For those who have really watched Bookish, the experience seems to have been delightful. And Mark Gatiss plus Polly Walker, what a fantastic cast. A crowd-pleaser of course, but always delivering!
I liked the atmosphere, the bookish thing in itself, the character development and the 'magnetic' traction of the show, which drew myself in from the very beginning. So what else can I do other than recommend it, especially for those lovers of British crime series.
I really enjoyed the first two episodes, or rather the first case. First, we learn about the bookstore and the area, as well as the main characters. The pacing is well-chosen; above all, you can enjoy the series, and the locations are very interesting. I really enjoyed the whole case. I especially loved the flashbacks, as they reminded me of Agatha Christie's films. The resolution wasn't predictable for me, and there were a few twists and turns. The camera work was okay and I also liked the editing. The character development was very good, especially for some of the main characters. I give it 9 out of 10, and I'm looking forward to the second case.
I wanted to like this program more than I actually did. It's premise, actors and affable quirks were most promising from the trailers. But it just didn't live up to it and I'm afraid it was Mark Gatiss, for me, who missed the mark.
The performance echoed and harked back to characters originally played in The League of Gentleman decades before (brilliant twisted humour). But having seen Gatiss perform this schtick many times in programs and films, it has worn thin.
Recently, I read an article where Mark Gatiss talked about nostalgia being the problem with new Dr Who episodes and holding it back. Ironically, nostalgia seems to be the guiding force behind his acting. I still like Gatiss but he is slowly ascending a glass pedestal of his own making.
The performance echoed and harked back to characters originally played in The League of Gentleman decades before (brilliant twisted humour). But having seen Gatiss perform this schtick many times in programs and films, it has worn thin.
Recently, I read an article where Mark Gatiss talked about nostalgia being the problem with new Dr Who episodes and holding it back. Ironically, nostalgia seems to be the guiding force behind his acting. I still like Gatiss but he is slowly ascending a glass pedestal of his own making.
This looks great and has very fine writing and performances. There's a limit to how many plot variations an amateur detective can have and Bookish doesn't really try to push the envelope.
But that is part of its charm.. familiarity with the characters and plots makes it all more enjoyable.
The one negative and itis a big one is that the sound quality s not good enough to make the dialogue clear in all circumstances. Could badly do with optional subtitles.
But that is part of its charm.. familiarity with the characters and plots makes it all more enjoyable.
The one negative and itis a big one is that the sound quality s not good enough to make the dialogue clear in all circumstances. Could badly do with optional subtitles.
Did you know
- TriviaAlthough set in London, it's mostly filmed in Belgium.
- GoofsThe London taxis are FX3, which were not produced until 1948 - 2 years on from the setting of the series.
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content