Eleven strategically minded players participate in a host of never before seen games designed to test their intellect, while carefully and creatively using the art of manipulation to outfox ... Read allEleven strategically minded players participate in a host of never before seen games designed to test their intellect, while carefully and creatively using the art of manipulation to outfox their opponents and win a cash prize.Eleven strategically minded players participate in a host of never before seen games designed to test their intellect, while carefully and creatively using the art of manipulation to outfox their opponents and win a cash prize.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
This is infinitely closer to the original Korean show than the dull Dutch version was. The weakest element is David Tennant who clearly filmed all his appearances months before any of the rest was shot; giving very "Krusty sending a video tape of himself to Kamp Krusty" energy.
If you're a fan of the classic The Genius this is certainly well worth a watch. It's got big personalities and variations on some great Genius games.
PS I'm not a fan of this trend of 'mind sport' game shows (Chess Masters, this...) giving the players superhero nicknames ("The Student," "The Chemist"...). It's utterly daft.
If you're a fan of the classic The Genius this is certainly well worth a watch. It's got big personalities and variations on some great Genius games.
PS I'm not a fan of this trend of 'mind sport' game shows (Chess Masters, this...) giving the players superhero nicknames ("The Student," "The Chemist"...). It's utterly daft.
People seem to think that "Genius Game" is a remake of Netflix's "The Devil's Plan". It isn't. "The Devil's Plan" is a spin-off of the original Korean show "The Genius" (2013-2015); they even have the same producer. The British Genius Game is a remake of that original show, and it adopts much of its set design and original games. So when people write here that blind poker and rock-paper-scissors betting game are trivial games invented by Westerners to dumb down the concept, they're simply wrong. Many of these games, including those mentioned, are taken straight out of the Korean original. Still, this, as well as the Dutch version, pales in comparison to the original. So what went wrong? Why the bad ratings? It's definitely a step up compared to the Dutch remake, but it repeats some of the same mistakes. Here are the main ones:
1. It's lacking brainpower: The British version of the Genius simply lacks people who truly belong to a show like this. These are alright, likeable people, but apart from Ken, Charlotte, Ben at times, India at times, none really give the impression of competing for the title of "genius". The Korean show had some goons, sure, don't get me wrong, but it was brimming with brainpower, and many of these people were already bonafide stars or went to become bonafide stars on Korean TV shows. You can't really say that's likely for many in this group. The Korean Genius made sure to have stars, much like the Devil's Plan, and when they didn't recruit stars, they recruited young Mensa prodigies. The British show didn't do this, much like the Dutch show. It just recruited fairly successful, but also fairly ordinary people that don't scream "genius" or "star". It's lacking a Dongmin, or a Jinho, or a Sangmin, and people who could keep up with them.
2. Production value: Here, the British version fares better than the Dutch. But the production is good mostly in directly adopting stuff from the original. It has the same set design and graphics design as the original. But it visibly cuts corners. The episodes are too short for the (new) viewer to figure out what's going on or to become invested in them. It doesn't include those supercool games from the original that include guests. It doesn't include games that allow players to shine as individuals (like the dice game or the one with the decks and calculation). It's lacking a bit of that suspense from the original. Finally, the season is a bit too short. So, it's definitely a step-up from the Dutch version, but it could do more.
3. It doesn't match the original's editing: The original editing from the Genius made sure you were in for a rollercoaster ride. The music was upbeat. There were twists in virtually every episode - they would make sure you weren't privy to all the information so that something could eventually surprise you, and to show you that not everything is as it seems. This version didn't have much of that (the Dutch version didn't have any of that). We just weren't all that invested because, sometimes, it was obvious how the game was going to go. Some of the blame goes to the players - frequently, they didn't generate this kind of content. But the editing was definitely somewhat lacking.
4. It was lacking originality - Us fans of the original game want to see more of "The Genius" in any shape or form. But the remake didn't do anything new. It was all just a little bland. It's amazing that the West doesn't know how to do a spin on the original in any shape or form. So for a fan of the original, it was a kind-of "been there, done that" experience.
2. Production value: Here, the British version fares better than the Dutch. But the production is good mostly in directly adopting stuff from the original. It has the same set design and graphics design as the original. But it visibly cuts corners. The episodes are too short for the (new) viewer to figure out what's going on or to become invested in them. It doesn't include those supercool games from the original that include guests. It doesn't include games that allow players to shine as individuals (like the dice game or the one with the decks and calculation). It's lacking a bit of that suspense from the original. Finally, the season is a bit too short. So, it's definitely a step-up from the Dutch version, but it could do more.
3. It doesn't match the original's editing: The original editing from the Genius made sure you were in for a rollercoaster ride. The music was upbeat. There were twists in virtually every episode - they would make sure you weren't privy to all the information so that something could eventually surprise you, and to show you that not everything is as it seems. This version didn't have much of that (the Dutch version didn't have any of that). We just weren't all that invested because, sometimes, it was obvious how the game was going to go. Some of the blame goes to the players - frequently, they didn't generate this kind of content. But the editing was definitely somewhat lacking.
4. It was lacking originality - Us fans of the original game want to see more of "The Genius" in any shape or form. But the remake didn't do anything new. It was all just a little bland. It's amazing that the West doesn't know how to do a spin on the original in any shape or form. So for a fan of the original, it was a kind-of "been there, done that" experience.
While a lot of viewers seem to think the games are too confusing, I liked that you had to really concentrate and think like one of the players. I didn't find them too difficult though, and especially the death match was a fun game (that I myself have played with friends before). David's persona as The Creator is a mysterious, yet interesting character that gives the show the extra bit it needs. Judging from the first episode, the format is really enjoyable and just the right amount of complicated mixed with reality and getting to know the contestants! It's what I personally seek from a show, so I'm really looking forward to the next episodes!
If it was just the games, like a modern day Krypton Factor, the game show would be better. As it is they have shoehorned in backstabbing and it thinks it is the traitors - it isn't. It feels drawn out and doesn't move forward, if they just cut that out what made it about how well they outsmart each other in the challenges, it would be an 8 out of 10 instead of 6.
Perhaps the contestants just aren't very likeable, I couldn't relate to their goals and why they formed cliques and turned on each other except the obvious: to win. Perhaps I'm weird for expecting and wanting more.
The production value of the show is good, it just feels like it's half filler.
Perhaps the contestants just aren't very likeable, I couldn't relate to their goals and why they formed cliques and turned on each other except the obvious: to win. Perhaps I'm weird for expecting and wanting more.
The production value of the show is good, it just feels like it's half filler.
I'm a huge fan of the Korean version of this game. A even bigger fan of The Devils Plan. There is a number of issues with the English version. 1. The casting is awful. You have chosen what you think western media wants which is drama, however its more bickering and zero strategizing. I feel like I'm watching some low quality Kardashian bs instead a game show about intelligence, social/political skills, problem solving/math and memory. Having a face to the host as well pulls the viewer out of the tension. 2. The show does an awful job of explaining the rules or creating a game thats actually challenging. The producers obviously thought this was a cash grab but have just shown that white people (I'm white) really are the most basic spiceless people. There's zero intrigue or reason to feel invested in the personalities and they are by no mean geniuses in their own right.
Did you know
- TriviaThe contestants from the series were active on social media, including interviews with dedicated podcasts. Weekly episode recaps/reactions were also provided by Benjamin Everly on his own YouTube channel, and Charlotte Yeung on her Twitch channel.
- ConnectionsVersion of Deo jinieoseu (2013)
Details
- Runtime
- 53m
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content