Sumala

Gave this movie a go since it was on Netflix. I had no problem with the movie if it didn't rely too much on the over-the-top gore (what is this, the Saw franchise?).

The jumpscares (if I could even call them that) weren't even that good and the overall plot progression was too straightforward, you could already tell how the story would end in the first few minutes of the gore.

The characters had nothing to offer emotionally (I couldn't even sympathize with Kumala) and were forgettable except for the titular antagonist.

The movie relied itself too much on how it was based off an urban legend and failed to expand or provide even a tidbit of twist. It tried to pass itself off as a supernatural horror but ended up becoming just a meh slasher film with a dash of demon possession.

Sumala may not bring a completely new or groundbreaking concept to the table, but it's still a very engaging watch. From the start, it knows exactly how to pull the audience in and keep the tension steady throughout. Lately, there's been a wave of Indonesian horror movies diving into the origins of different ghosts and spirits, and while that trend is getting a bit crowded, Sumala manages to stand out. It doesn't feel repetitive or dull like some others. The storytelling is tight, the atmosphere is creepy in the best way, and the emotional side of the story gives it more depth. It's clear that the filmmakers cared about the details, and that makes a big difference.

The movie introduces us to a group of kids playing with a ball in a small village. After the ball is kicked into a field, one of the boys runs after it, and his friend soon follows. He finds the boy being repeatedly hit on the head with a stone by some kind of entity. Chaos erupts in the village when the father of the murdered boy assumes the friend is responsible until a man arrives and begins to tell the origin story of the local legend of Sumala.

From that point on, we travel back in time and learn about a woman named Sulastri, who made a pact with the devil so she could have children. She later gives birth to female twins, but one of the children is killed by her husband because it was deformed. The surviving child grows up with physical and mental disabilities. On her 8th birthday, her deceased twin's vengeful spirit possesses her to seek revenge on those who harmed her.

What follows is carnage, plenty of gore, and numerous jump scares. The movie is much more brutal than I anticipated, and I really enjoyed that aspect. Some of the effects looked great, but the occasional poor CGI gave the film a cheap appearance. The story itself is familiar, another tale of a vengeful spirit possessing a body to exact revenge-and it didn't bring much originality to the table.

The acting was mostly fine, though a few weak performances affected the immersion and reduced the tension in certain scenes. The entity itself was terrifying, with a deformed body, sharp teeth, and pale skin.

Overall, while the narrative could have been more unique or developed in a deeper way, some great gore scenes made up for it. It's a fairly decent watch that offers an entertaining two hours, but ultimately, it's not especially memorable. [5.6/10]

Evidently it's based on real-life reports of a demonic presence in an Indonesian community. Instead of exploring these alleged encounters the movie focuses on the origin of the titular antagonist. There's some decent gore but very little horror because none of the characters are likeable enough to engender any sympathy. There are also no surprises or reveals because the story is completely straightforward. It's competently directed, edited and acted but the overall experience is never more than middling because the script doesn't take any interesting risks or deviate from the expected narrative.

This movie is a horror film inspired by a real urban legend from a village in Semarang, Indonesia. The story of Sumala has been widely discussed in local podcasts, and the village is known for its strict rule prohibiting people from going outside after Maghrib. According to witnesses, a boy was killed by Sumala while retrieving a lost ball, and his body was later found in a river. These chilling accounts have contributed to the legend's eerie reputation.

However, the film takes a different approach. Instead of focusing on the firsthand ghostly encounters reported by multiple visitors to the village, it chooses to dive into the backstory of Sumala, a narrative that may or may not be true. This decision weakens the horror aspect, as the film leans more into action-gore territory, resembling movies like *Chucky* and *Saw*, rather than delivering the eerie suspense expected from a ghost story.

One of the biggest letdowns is the acting. Darius Sinathrya, who plays the father, gives an unconvincing very poor performance, while Luna Maya, playing the mother, delivers a passable but uninspired role. The supporting cast is a mixed bag, some performances are solid, but others fall flat. Despite its tense atmosphere, the weak acting and misplaced focus on gore over mystery make the film less compelling than it could have been.

Overall, Sumala had the potential to be a gripping horror film, especially with the terrifying real-life accounts behind it. But instead of exploring the unsettling experiences of those who have visited the village of Sumala, it prioritizes an exaggerated origin story, making it feel more like an action-gore thriller than a true horror mystery.