A missing girl, gangsters, a terrible secret, and a heavy body count. The British soap opera genre just got nasty.A missing girl, gangsters, a terrible secret, and a heavy body count. The British soap opera genre just got nasty.A missing girl, gangsters, a terrible secret, and a heavy body count. The British soap opera genre just got nasty.
Lucinda Rhodes Thakrar
- Sally
- (as Lucinda Rhodes-Flaherty)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Having been treated to a bit of zero budget amazingness just 4 weeks earlier in Death Walks, Spencer hawken is back with No Reasons a disturbing movie weaved by the same cloth as Death Walks. To quote the character of Sally (Lucinda Rhodes) "life is not all pink fluffy clouds". Oh my goodness this is not a nice movie, truly awesome, but shocking. The first hour dawdled on by luring you into a false sense of security, the second hour grabbed you by the privates and vomited into your mouth. This is awesome to the most extreme, I cannot think of another movie that takes you quite down a dark twisted path like this one. I worry someone will let the secret out of the bag, because when it comes to twists and secrets this is the best one I've seen in a very long time. Great performances, seedy villains, female rapists... its all good family fun to the very last, somewhat shocking second.
I watched this the other night and really didn't care for it as I watched. But, afterwards, when I had time to think about it, I liked it better and want to watch again. The movie does a good job of presenting the problem of human trafficking without explicitly talking about it. It's a long movie. Some of the characters are rather comical. Not sure this isn't meant to be a very dark comedy. Not really much of a horror, with the exception of a few scenes. Nice twist at the end.
Not much gore and no nudity but what a vile film.
It kept me wondering what was going to happen.
It's a sick world. I am one for the extreme side of cinema and this delivered.
A terrible script which made me laugh out loud when I shouldn't!
The acting doesn't help the cause because it's also pretty weak.
At the half way point it actually does get farcical with a ridiculous scene of cartoon violence.
Daniel Peacock is the only bright spot in the cast... but even he struggles with his daft role as a private investigator.
Anyway, if you want a good laugh at other people's expense this may pass the time.
I can think of better ways to spend this budget.
Once we get past the inevitable "early-10" reviews (usually by members of the cast or maybe relatives of the caterers), and past the low-ball reviews that make a huge fuss about the budget (most indies have a low budget, which is why they are indies), we finally get a chance to look at the actual film. The first thing you notice is the runtime. Hawken did not set out to do a simple "filler" for cable because his final cut is well over 2 hours. This was a serious effort at a "genre-busting" riff on the now-popular "lost teen" niche. Except that, rather being a straightforward procedural, it breaks more of the genre's conventions than it follows. It is this aspect alone -- that the viewer cam never quite see around the next corner -- that makes NO REASONS more interesting than it would otherwise be. As for all the comments on the horror of the underlying story, wake up and smell the Evil. Anyone in law enforcement will tell you this film actually UNDERSTATES the reality.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- £10,000 (estimated)
- Runtime2 hours 11 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content