Two rogue spies go off-grid, marry, and come under attack at their remote cabin hideaway by various intel agencies seeking a stolen hard drive.Two rogue spies go off-grid, marry, and come under attack at their remote cabin hideaway by various intel agencies seeking a stolen hard drive.Two rogue spies go off-grid, marry, and come under attack at their remote cabin hideaway by various intel agencies seeking a stolen hard drive.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Dreadful film, terrible script, editing and whats worse a waste of two otherwise fine actors in Eastwood and Stallone..
Would a directors cut save it, I doubt it unless it was a complete reshoot. What a shame.
Special effects were dreadful, storyline which it claims to have is full of holes and Scott's acting was terrible, when you think that two hollywood stars with with a list of successful films behind them couldn't save it it says a lot. If you go to the cinema to watch this I'd suggest watching the on screen advertisements and then leaving before it comes on.. the Add's would definitely be better.
Would a directors cut save it, I doubt it unless it was a complete reshoot. What a shame.
Special effects were dreadful, storyline which it claims to have is full of holes and Scott's acting was terrible, when you think that two hollywood stars with with a list of successful films behind them couldn't save it it says a lot. If you go to the cinema to watch this I'd suggest watching the on screen advertisements and then leaving before it comes on.. the Add's would definitely be better.
How can a movie production have all these good actors and still manage to make such a terrible movie. Directors do not get enough credit and this movie proves it. The acting is bad, the fight scenes are terrible you can see them waiting for one another to make a move with poor reactions to getting hit., the stunts are terrible. Maybe Stallone, Eastwood, and Colter owed someone new producer or director a favor? This movie should have a warning label letting viewers know they are going to be severely disappointed. It leaves you very curious as to why they would agree to participate in such a poorly conceived idea.
The ingredients are simple: lure some stars with synopsis to a project, but then put all of it in hands of bad writing, amateur direction, tons of nonsense and awful sfx, plot holes large as the local group of galaxies, drunk editing, absence of any coherence and attempts of acting (actually, what acting? True, some of the participants in this gave it a try but, alas, to no avail). Did you know that you can perform a large shootout (no one reloads even once) with a lot of explosions and noise in a relatively small town (they call it village), allegedly in Poland ("enemies" speak Russian, of course, and die like in John Wick, by dozens, being incompetent like kindergarten children), and no inhabitants even come to the window to see what happens? There's nobody anywhere near but "our heroes". The cherry on top of this mess is a strong hint on possible sequel, since this abruptly ends. God forbid! There are A movies, B movies, even C movies. At the bottom there are BS movies. This is a fine example. Two stars for skill of engaging Sly and Scott Eastwood. Were they blackmailed to participate? Nothing else could explain it. Run from this before it's too late.
This movie is soooo bad, it felt like watching a high school project. Acting is an absolute amateur hour, and the dialogs are top of the line cringe material. I watched 30 minutes of this garbage and i feel intelectualy violated and insulted. For someone to peddle this mess as a "movie worthy of an audience", makes me realise that they don't really care about creating quality entertainment or even about what audience thinks, they just need to put new trash in our face from time to time to keep the streaming platform memberships going. The recipe is this: 1-2 big hollywood names for top dollar, other actors for cheap, and locations you can get for a few bucks, and a trash script with a newbie director. Total budget 1-2 mil. Max. And just keep pumping that garbage out month after month.
Despite having Scott Eastwood and Stallone, this film is ponderous. Eastwood hardly seems enthusiastic, and really doesn't give the impression of having once been a top agent. Stallone is beginning to creak, and he struggles physically with this action picture, which should have been much tighter.
Mike Colter deserves a shout out. His villain is cold, calculating and murderousy believable, but he is wasted in this calamity. The shootouts are just not believable, Eastwood seems to be missable at every opportunity and during his first gunfight, he has a machine gun that never needs reloading!
Willa Fitzgerald holds it together rather well, but isn't able to rescue this mess.
Mike Colter deserves a shout out. His villain is cold, calculating and murderousy believable, but he is wasted in this calamity. The shootouts are just not believable, Eastwood seems to be missable at every opportunity and during his first gunfight, he has a machine gun that never needs reloading!
Willa Fitzgerald holds it together rather well, but isn't able to rescue this mess.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film was awarded $5,863,392 from the Ohio Motion Picture Tax Credit Program on February 13, 2024.
- GoofsThey keep mentioning a chopper and the chopper pilot, but it was a Cessna with two pilots. Apparantly this was changed during filming and they didn't fix it in ADR.
- SoundtracksSymphony No. 38 in D major, Prague, K. 504
Performed by Prague Philharmonia - Jiri Belohlavek
Written by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Courtesy of SUPRAPHON a.s.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Alarum: Código letal
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $20,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $251,152
- Runtime
- 1h 35m(95 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content