IMDb RATING
5.3/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
In an oppressive future, where everyone's only contact is their computer, one lonely young man is forced to venture forth in search of human contact.In an oppressive future, where everyone's only contact is their computer, one lonely young man is forced to venture forth in search of human contact.In an oppressive future, where everyone's only contact is their computer, one lonely young man is forced to venture forth in search of human contact.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
A bit slow going and could have done with a lot more action, but overall not a bad film.
I felt that there should have been more about the back story and maybe a bit more looking at what had happened to the rest of the world.
Worth a watch if your bored, but don't anticipate to much from this film.
I felt that there should have been more about the back story and maybe a bit more looking at what had happened to the rest of the world.
Worth a watch if your bored, but don't anticipate to much from this film.
I wasn't expecting much from this, but it was a surprisingly good little story despite the small cast and small number of locations; it didn't need more. It's also very relevant for the future with everything that's happened in the last two years and the way things are going.
Like a found footage flick, this one benefits from its shortcomings by focusing on what is available without a big budget. Most of the good parts are at the end, but the first half was not utterly devoid of interest. The commentary on social media, tech, and video games was perhaps a bit on the nose, but it created an effective sense of isolation -- of an almost "empty world" -- pretty well.
Just read the reviews for DARWIN (2016).... Money grab re-issue of the exact same film.
The original was meh. This renamed title is obviously still meh.
Disappointed to see the great Molly Parker here.
The original was meh. This renamed title is obviously still meh.
Disappointed to see the great Molly Parker here.
This is one of those insufferable cases where a great idea was executed clumsily, and it seems to be largely due to the format at hand. Other reviewers point out the obvious that this is a story that ultimately could not fit the scope it is intended to (a feature length film). It would make for a great singular TV episode type thing, or a short novel.
Ultimately as a 90 minute movie, it is too light on content and storytelling to maintain itself. It is quite literally the kind of film where you could fade in and out of and not lose step with it as long as you are paying attention to the first and last 15 minutes or so.
It's all very interesting and neat, but that's it.
Ultimately as a 90 minute movie, it is too light on content and storytelling to maintain itself. It is quite literally the kind of film where you could fade in and out of and not lose step with it as long as you are paying attention to the first and last 15 minutes or so.
It's all very interesting and neat, but that's it.
Did you know
- TriviaFilmed in the summer of 2014, this movie has had 4 different titles. It started as "ESC," then became "Darwin," then became "Confinement," and the latest is "2149: The Aftermath"
- Goofs[Incorrectly regarded as goofs)
Contrary to another goof listed - it should be noted that an entire scene is spent introducing the main character to the concept of personal hygiene. Due to the appearance of a rudimentary shower, bar of soap and the family all having decently neat haircuts and clothing free from grime and dirt, it is therefore not unreasonable to assume that these characters would want to maintain personal grooming routines for some semblance of normalcy, in spite of the post-apocalyptic setting.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- CA$5,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 34m(94 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content