Stockholm

• however, this also far from bad.

The drawbacks on this film are:

the horrid soundtrack which keep playing non-stop - and the bad choice of music as well

the poor lighting

bad editing

bad voice syncing

lack of camera angles

lack of intenseity

lack of fear from the very beginning

A really good cast - a decent budget, some decent camera work, a far better sound track, some intense music which brings out the story and a little more thought put into this - as well as another rewrite or two on the script to bring it up a bit would have made this much more interesting.

This had a small budget and some close to new beginners for it's crew and cast - and while it's not horrid, it's not great either.

There is plenty of potential here - but is was passed on for something that is just watchable - but nothing special.

I easily would have developed this into a much tighter intense story - with some fear from the very beginning.

There was no fear or anxiety and there was no depth - and there should have been plenty.

Depth, some nice camera work, better editing and some intense mystery - as well as some mystery and a backing soundtrack that isn't nerve-racking would have made this into a really cool movie.

Even with the two leads, they weren't bad - but in the wrong hands with the low budget, they missed the opportunity to shine.

First rule if you want to make a movie. GET PEOPLE THAT CAN ACT! Because without actors you just don't have a movie but a lamentable voyage into a director's career being flushed cleanly down the toilette along with the $$$$$ embossed toilette paper of the idiots that decide to finance this crap!

Acting isn't superb. It's very boring until the last 20 minutes. However, those last 20 minutes redeem the entire movie. Much better twist than what it seemed like it was gonna be. If you have some free time and maybe a project to finish, turn this on.

If you can get over the horrible lighting, the God awful camera-work (think shaky and out of focus quite a few times), and Tommy Dreamer's annoyingly bad acting, it's actually a pretty good movie. I'd never watched anything with Rachel Jane Conn in it before, but turns out she's one hell of an actor. She could teach some of the so called A- listers a few lessons in how to scream like you're in actual pain, or conveying a plethora of emotions with your facial expressions alone (looking at you, Kristen Stewart). James Duval was also great, but can't really comment on his acting without giving spoilers. I really liked the premise and the script as well, and the twist, and even the ending. Those are really rare in B (or C, in this case?) movies. Go ahead and give it a shot; you might like it too.

It was slow, anticlimactic, and poorly executed. Bad acting. Poor camera crew. It was like a cheap made at home $100 movie. Would not recommend