John Lennon: Murder Without a Trial

Yawn inducing documentary presented by B-list actor Kiefer Sutherland. It adds nothing new just re-establishes the same untruths the media has been spewing for 45 years. Kind of ironic given his fathers brilliant 10 minute cameo in Oliver Stone's JFK.

In the spring of 2020, TV producer and writer David Whelan, concerned at the dozens of anomalies he found in the case, commenced a three-year long investigation into the assassination of John Lennon. Whelan gained exclusive access to the notebooks and paperwork of the NYPD's lead detective on the case, as well as interviewing everyone who was connected to the events: Dakota workers, Lennon insiders and employees, NYPD cops and detectives, and the medics who tried to save John Lennon in the Roosevelt Hospital Emergency Room. All gave new and highly revealing testimony.

By interviewing the lead doctor Dr. Halleran and nurses Kammerar and Sato, and the anesthetist Eilis Egan, Whelan discovered that they all had worked to resuscitate Lennon at the hospital. They all stated that Lennon had actually been shot four times in the front chest area, not in the back. Whelan then does an excellent job of presenting all the additional unanswered abnomalies left by the incompetent investigation done by the New York Police Dept. Contrary to popular belief Chapman was never a Beatles fan for as asserted by his family.

Nobody comes out of this tragedy well, from the myriad roll call of Charlies (who want their fifteen minutes of fame who straight out lied about what they saw that night) to Yoko, (who has never given an account of what happened that night that tallies with one other of her accounts, and who has actually never said that she saw Chapman shoot John). The New York Police, who didn't investigate because ,well ,they "knew" know who did it, due to the confession..why was one of the most famous people in the world not even given the same due process any normal citizen would deserve? And to the prison service who unbelievably allowed Milton Kline, a notorious CIA -hired hypnotist regular access to Chapman in prison!

Lennon was too reckless in his life and knew that powerful forces ("nefarious forces " as the author likes to say) were after him. Taking on religion, probably the most dangerous thing that he could do, not reckoning that in the USA such comments would never be forgotten or forgiven. Also, taking on Nixon, whose trail leads straight to Chapman via the corrupted 'Baptist/ Secret Services collaboration (which ex- president Gerald Ford admitted existed) was beyond reckless.

All leads point to certain three letter rogue government organization that starts with the letter C. I would suggest reading Whelan's book "Mind Games" for the true story of his assassination. Not a conspiracy theory just a collection of meticulously researched interviews and facts that completely annihilates the official narrative which i foolishly believed for some forty years.

Interesting recap of the Lennon murder with interviews of the people who were actually on scene. The now retired cops sound real and seem out of central casting. The CIA and FBI are brought into it but doesn't really go anywhere with that line so the end focus is on the sentencing and parole hearings. Parallel to the Hinckley trial and eventual release is made, kind of a progressive view which probably makes some sense here. If Chapman is no longer being punished and the public safety is not at risk why keep him in jail 43 years later? At some point he should do like Red in Shawshank and give up on parole, then it will happen.

This documentary does a good job of portraying the events surrounding John Lennon's murder. The interviews with witnesses and other people directly involved in the case are insightful and well done. It also presents worthwhile video and audio from the era in order to provide context and texture.

The show also spends a considerable amount of time on John's killer, which is harder to stomach. Some of this material is actually useful to the extent that it establishes his motive and state of mind. There's also background about his upbringing and life before the murder, which I mostly skipped past. The question of whether he was sane at the time of the killing is addressed in detail, but ultimately doesn't make much difference.

Unfortunately, the documentary also indulges in some utterly irresponsible speculation about the possibility of government involvement in the killing. This unfounded conspiracy theory goes nowhere and adds nothing to the story. I'm honestly a bit surprised that Apple would even allow it on their air.

There were so many books written about Lennon that the average fan will not learn much ;even the subject of a political murder was mooted shortly after the tragedy : Fenton Bressler ,a practising barrister ,even released "the murder of John Lennon" in 1989.

But Lennon buffs should not miss this three-episode miniseries : the main interest is to have gathered all the main witnesses and to have them search their memories and tell how the tragedy occured : the concierge of the Dakota, the taxi driver, the policeman who arrived first on the place, the doctor who tried to save the singer , a nurse and producer Jack Douglas (I had never seen the scene when he and his wife try to enter the hospital ) Much time is given over to mourning of the fans , the murderer's wife and the famous "catcher in the rye" ; as for the slayer ,his motive was probably to attract the attention ,like the murder attempt on Ronald Reagan mentioned here. Lennon remains,along McCartney ,my favorite rock artist.

There are some moments in this documentary that will be new and insightful for even the hardcore Beatles fan like myself who has seen pretty much everything there is to see regarding this tragedy. The extensive use of archival footage was also great and well put-together.

It definitely could have been longer, however. Despite it being in three parts there were sections that would have benefited from diving a little deeper into and elaborating on from a storytelling perspective. There is also more archival footage out there that could have been included. I get the feeling however certain things were intentionally glossed over, lightly touched-on and/or omitted due to this still being a sensitive subject for many all these years later.

The sensitive nature of the subject also means it will get it's share of negative reviews, with people feeling it's exploitive or disrespectful, angry at the mere acknowledgement of Mark David Chapman. Outside of that mentality however, it's definitely worth a watch. I personally believe a real good job was done in remaining respectful whilst still making the series quite captivating for the viewer.