Another Day of Life

An animated film, spliced in parts, with real documentary film of interviews with important subjects within the animated tale. Rizsard Kapuscinsky was an exceptionally gifted, brave and heroic reporter. He reported the facts and truth of the corrupt cold war slaughterhouse being waged by America and Russia in the African backyard of Angola. A war, which this film bio informs us of, where both sides - the MPLA and the NFLA - murdered millions and committed despicable atrocities!

The animated sections are in the English language and the actual documentary pieces are in native tongues; but there are subtitles available so that you know what is said. It makes for a gripping and most thoroughly interesting watch and, is presented in an almost comic style very polished looking animated style. There is no one sided reporting as it tells the tale of the misery caused by both side and both superpowers; a misery that endured for the Angolan people for 27 years.

Very good movie on the Angola civil war, a subject not often explored in film but full of possibilities as most wars are. But this is a different kind of movie as it uses animation to tell its story while also taking the Band of Brothers way of storytelling, by having the real people who were involved in it say in their own words what happened. It is mostly animation but with live action images scattered throughout, resulting in a very engaging experience. Technically I found the movie breathtakingly beautiful, using a style of animation that I don't particularly like but making the most out of it, creating some beautiful imagery and a realism that I wasn't expecting. Congratulations to the duo directing the movie, really well done. And now I must delve a bit on the political side of this movie. As a Portuguese this is a story that resonates a lot with us because it was a huge deal in our country, full of changes during that period of time. I must address another reviewer here that didn't like the way it made the MPLA look like saints, and he didn't like the movie because of it, he made a lot of valid points but I don't think this movie is as black and white as he makes it seem, sure it is told through the eyes of MPLA supporters, but there are a lot of clues to show that they were no saints, for example, when they are talking about the brother or comrade way of addressing a soldier, they say it's a coin flip and they both will kill you if you address them in the wrong manner, and by the end, the Artur character is extremely disappointed with the way the war turned out, where all their ideals and principals were never upheld, calling into question the whole war, which again shows that the MPLA were not very different from UNITA. And this brings me to our main character, Ryszard Kapuscinski. He was a very well known Polish journalist and writer and upon some research I found that he was not very consensual, as he often took real stories and romanticized them so much to the point of being total inventions. By adapting one of his works the filmmakers made an excellent decision of using the before mentioned technique of mixing animation, to tell the Kapuscinski story, and real live footage, to act as kind of a fact checker about what is being said. Highly recommended.

As I was watching this adult animated feature about a real story rooted in history, human conflict, and the human need to forge meaning and purpose out of the far-too often chaotic and tragic course of events... I was reminded of other films in this space that I've seen, loved, and which left their mark on me. Funan. The Breadwinner. Grave of the Fireflies. And many other titles that carry a fair amount of prestige with them, at least for me. But the one film I kept coming back to as a point of comparison both in terms of style and feel was Waltz with Bashir, one of my favorite animated movies, and among my favorite films ever.

And, while it's been a really long time since I've seen that film, the ghost it left behind inside of me, with its visuals and story ruminating within my mind consciously and my spirit subconsciously, there's a lot of shared DNA here. Tragedy. The cruel inescapability of war and conflict in the human experience and the human emotional response to those forces. The surreal, dreamlike imagery. But the most crucial thing might be where they depart.

See, Waltz was a very tight, coherent story. It flowed smoothly and was paced well and it was centered around a dark truth from the past and how crimes against humanity never merely pass into nothingness, they continue to echo both within those misfortunate enough to have survived or taken part in them, but also in a tragically karmic way, of continuing the cycle of violence and hatred in a perpetual dance of misery between the victim and the oppressor as the roles change hands. In that film it is the recognition of this fact amidst a recognition of shared humanity that challenges the viewer to slowly unravel it and eventually come face to face with the Other as Self and see the Self as Other.

I only wish Another Day of Life was so well put together and envisioned. It's full of brave, bold choices, not the least of which is blending documentary content (interviews, real-world photos and shots) with the animation throughout the film. This is something I've never seen done in this way, and it really did strike me as creatively brilliant. But it also held this film back from being its best self. The filmmakers seem to be trying to convey something here, as we the audience get routinely pulled out of the narrative, often with little warning or with abrupt transitions, to see one of our characters in real life at present day, giving their own narrative account of the events. This gives the film a kind of authenticity few others ever carry and give it something perhaps even rarer: a real sense of PERSPECTIVE.

But with perspective, comes bias. And, for me, not being at all well-versed in the subject matter, I found myself starting to feel that bias as unsettling. Losing objectivity is one thing, but it's another to start feeling one has to question accuracy and truth. What's the other side of the story, I wondered. Surely, the real world rarely gives us examples of such a simplistic narrative as "MPLA as goodguys, FLNA/UNITA as badguys". Surely all parties had their own interests, motivations, and agency beyond simply being manipulated by the Western or Soviet Blocs... and yet, we get none of that context here. We simply see the struggle as it was experienced by the characters. I think a more self-aware film might have attempted to predict and preempt this viewer reaction, but perhaps it would not be faithful to the source material then-I don't know, as I haven't read the book upon which this is based.

In any case, beyond the questions of rationalist viewers' minds who might start having their "propaganda/politics alarms" going off, there's a far more practical problem that this format introduces: that it is ver jarring to the audience to be pulled in and out of a narrative. This might have been eased if the editing were done to make the transitions smoother, but it almost felt like the intention was the opposite: to intentionally jolt us, as if to say "don't get caught up in hearing a good story... do not forget that this is not just a story, it is of real people and their lives". And to that, I must simply bow my head, because it certainly had that effect on me. It took me out of the excitement, the drama, all of it, and brought me back, face-to-face, again and again with the sobering reminder that this was real. For, there were the real people... those still alive to speak to their experience. That is something that all too often gets lost in this kind of film, as we watch events unfold in detachment, even if we know they are rooted in reality. To suddenly hear the words of that same character speaking to the camera and explaining it... well that is another thing. I applaud the bravery to go this route.

Still, not everyone is going to enjoy the experience, for it is not made to be enjoyed, and perhaps maybe that is the way such films should be made. It is not for us to feel good, have a happy ending, or retain our sense of safety and detachment. This film wants us to recognize there is something deep here about human nature and perhaps just about nature itself and how the world works, that when the chaos comes, we cannot always escape it. We can choose whether or not to participate in it... and what part to play or which side to be on, and then make the choices we can where we can, and if we are very lucky they might be ones that have a chance to shift the course of events. But nevertheless, we mostly just survive it. Or not. And the film wants us to know that these times are not things that only exist "over there", or even just "out there", they are everywhere and they will always come again, and yes, too, they even extend inside of us, as battles that rage within our hearts and minds and our souls as we are forced to choose and to act within such events. I was reminded of the saying, though I cannot recall its source or veracity: "people think they make history, but it is often the other way around".

So, maybe the disjointed feeling of the edits and style are there for a reason, or maybe I'm just making up reasons that act as excuses to an unpolished presentation... I don't know. But the situation is not helped by the constant injection of surrealism and dream sequences that border on magical realism at times. This too might have artistic merit and may well represent a unique voice. And if you are open to that kind of thing you will enjoy it. But, objectively, it does not help the film move along and work together AS A FILM. And so, if you are going into this expecting just a good, straight-forward animated story, you might be put off but something that at times feels like you went from watching the Killing Fields or Apocalypse Now to the Science of Sleep. If symbolic representations of the deconstruction of a character and their world in the midst of key scenes make you roll your eyes, you may want to pass on this one. If that sounds intriguing and worth a look, put this higher up your list. If you're open to it, but skeptical, just be aware going in so you don't try to put this on for a group that isn't going to appreciate it.

So, if you are up for it, this is a thought-provoking film and might be the beginning of a good deal more reading for you as you attempt to sift through sources and authorities and try to judge how biases or balanced the accounts might be. You are in for something that will impact you and make you think, and there are some truly gut wrenching and tear-worthy moments, as well as some heart-warming ones. You'll be left conflicted, but it will feel appropriate and earned. Unless you turned the film off after the 7th time animation abruptly gave way to a real-life interview, or our main character suddenly flying through space yet again left you wondering what the hell was actually going on. Any true voice is neither unbiased, nor balanced.... But has something perhaps even more worth your listening if you give it the chance.

This movie is like two movies in one. Part of it is a documentary about the Angolan Civil War. The other part is an animated film about the same subject, following Polish journalist Ryszard Kapuscinski reporting on the war in the 1970s. The first thing that I need to talk about is the animation. It is animated in that rotoscoped cell-shaded CGI style similar to A Scanner Darkly or the Love, Death & Robots short Fish Night. Normally, I hate animation that is trying to look realistic, but I didn't mind it here. There are many sequences of animation in this movie that just couldn't possibly work as well in live-action. The colours are really nice and it is intense! It actually feels like you're in the middle of a war! The story I found very interesting and the intercut documentary footage of people who actually knew the main character in real life and are characters in the movie themselves was really cool and helped with my understanding of the story and the history behind the film. The acting was really good as well and I really cared about the characters. Overall, if you like animation or historical war movies, you should watch this movie. It's very short, but very good!

Rizsard Kapuscinsky is one of the most important reporters of the XX Century, and someone who witnessed some of the biggest war crimes in Europe, Latin America and Africa. His books and reportages are ineludible documents to understand all the interests behind war, invasions and geopolitics. It is not surprise that any American viewer say nothing about this animated documentary. It is very probably that American audiences doesn't like at all what Kapuscinski has written, and the way he is portrayed on here. Very far from the way are portayed reporters Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein on the Watergate affair. In that case, there is no ideology. America film and history are made to believe that what both Washington Post reporters it is what investigative journalism is all about. This is, for say the least, an arrogant point of view. America is not the world, nor even the center of the word. Is one pole. The other is Russia, and the former USSR.

This animated documentary involves both poles from the Cold War, and is not, and cannot be by any means precisely a fruit of objectivity. But, as Kapuscinski put it in many other of his reporter works, and is put it that way on here, his job is to give word to those are condemned to be forgotten, those who usually die amidst oblivion and never are listen, those who are needed and poor, just like Jesus say on his preach, which not means I compared Jesus with Kapuscinski.

Animation is awesome on this documentary, the way are blended original footage and pictures of many of the depicted characters is just amazing, and shows how American power is capable of the worst atrocities only to support its foreing policy of destruction and empoverity entire countries. The Angola conflict is one of those defeites that American doesn't want to remember, after Vietnam. Of course, it would be naïve to consider that this documentary support openly Russian interventionism, since they abandon too Angola, only to see how Cuba took their place in the conflict and made it to succeed.

There is no such a thing called neutral interventionism, but Kapuscinski knows that he has to be the voice of those who hasn't and seem condemned to be crashed by any outside political power. "This is the way I look" is a frase repeated several times in the documentary, as if little people raise his voice to be remeber in the future and not fall into oblivion. That's the very point on what Kapuscinski was doing all his life, and for that will be remembered as one of the biggest and more influential reporters of the last century.

A very impressive documentary, a must see to unveil our prejudices about interventionism.