IMDb RATING
7.3/10
1.4K
YOUR RATING
Guileless seventeen-year-old Johnjo O'Shea goes from innocent bystander to accessory to premeditated murder after giving some friends a lift.Guileless seventeen-year-old Johnjo O'Shea goes from innocent bystander to accessory to premeditated murder after giving some friends a lift.Guileless seventeen-year-old Johnjo O'Shea goes from innocent bystander to accessory to premeditated murder after giving some friends a lift.
- Nominated for 2 BAFTA Awards
- 1 win & 5 nominations total
Photos
Michael Gambon
- Crown Court Judge
- (as Sir Michael Gambon)
Philip Hill-Pearson
- Tony Wallace
- (as Philip Hill Pearson)
Harry McMullen
- Thomas Ward
- (as Harry McMullan)
Jack McMullen
- Colin McCabe
- (as Jack McMullan)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
10redban02
If you're reading this review, I might assume that you are American, as I am. This movie, obviously, occurs in Britain; and the subject matter(Joint Enterprise Law) is strictly British. Still, I assure you that this foreignness won't hinder your enjoyment or lessen the movie's criticism of the law.
The movie's crux is fairly simple. The protagonist is a 17-year old named Johnjo O'Shea. He drives 3 of his brother's friends to a pizza store, with the belief that they only wanted a pizza. In actuality, the trio --- Colin McCabe, Hugo Davies, Kieran Gillespie --- intended to non-fatally confront an enemy, and during the altercation, Kieran Gillespie stabs an innocent bystander. Johnjo O'Shea, who waited outside in the car the entire time, drove the trio away. He had no knowledge of the murder until after.
Based on those facts, you would assume that only Kieran Gillespie would be charged with murder because only he wielded the knife, no? There is where you are wrong, and there is where the movie's criticism begins and ends.
Courtesy of the "joint enterprise" law, all four boys get charged with murder, with the frightening prospect of life in jail. I would say more, but I won't spoil.
The movie nicely highlights the injustice of the law. Policemen, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys -- all are heartless, devious, or dim-witted in this flick. Joint enterprise becomes especially villainous because the viewer feels sympathy towards the protagonist, which arises from his own circumstances as well as the movie's depiction of his mother's worries (well-acted by the beautiful Jodhi May).
If I had one criticism, I wish the movie had been about 30 minutes longer (2 hours) to more fully develop the legal process. But this criticism is minor and clearly insufficient to prevent my conferring a 10 rating.
The movie's crux is fairly simple. The protagonist is a 17-year old named Johnjo O'Shea. He drives 3 of his brother's friends to a pizza store, with the belief that they only wanted a pizza. In actuality, the trio --- Colin McCabe, Hugo Davies, Kieran Gillespie --- intended to non-fatally confront an enemy, and during the altercation, Kieran Gillespie stabs an innocent bystander. Johnjo O'Shea, who waited outside in the car the entire time, drove the trio away. He had no knowledge of the murder until after.
Based on those facts, you would assume that only Kieran Gillespie would be charged with murder because only he wielded the knife, no? There is where you are wrong, and there is where the movie's criticism begins and ends.
Courtesy of the "joint enterprise" law, all four boys get charged with murder, with the frightening prospect of life in jail. I would say more, but I won't spoil.
The movie nicely highlights the injustice of the law. Policemen, judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys -- all are heartless, devious, or dim-witted in this flick. Joint enterprise becomes especially villainous because the viewer feels sympathy towards the protagonist, which arises from his own circumstances as well as the movie's depiction of his mother's worries (well-acted by the beautiful Jodhi May).
If I had one criticism, I wish the movie had been about 30 minutes longer (2 hours) to more fully develop the legal process. But this criticism is minor and clearly insufficient to prevent my conferring a 10 rating.
I watched this in 2025 some 11 years after it was made. On BBC4 it was accompanied by a 15 minute trailer by Jimmy explaining his thoughts. The difficult topic is handled very delicately and the overall result is magnificent.
Script - Jimmy McGovern does a marvellous job of representing all parties with empathy and skill yet making it entertaining and gripping.
The Cast - magnificent cast and the acting is really strong throughout.
Soundtrack - great, I'm not sure who does it but it sounds like Robert Wyatt maybe.
Overall - the purpose and message is delivered superbly and this is a quality production I commend you to watch!!
Script - Jimmy McGovern does a marvellous job of representing all parties with empathy and skill yet making it entertaining and gripping.
The Cast - magnificent cast and the acting is really strong throughout.
Soundtrack - great, I'm not sure who does it but it sounds like Robert Wyatt maybe.
Overall - the purpose and message is delivered superbly and this is a quality production I commend you to watch!!
'Common' is a low-budget drama centered around the prosecution of four young men that got involved on a stupid crime by different ways and degrees.
It will then explore difficult choices made by all those involved, who also comprise families and other people, exploring angles around the prosecution of the crime and its wranglings.
The major difference for other typical courtroom dramas is that 'Common' is more concerned on the tensions that arise between co- conspirators.
Acting is decent, and sometimes even good. Editing is also well-done considering the profile of the movie. The end result is pleasant and it does give food for thought regarding a specific controversial feature of the law that is obviously conveyed as negative in the movie.
The major flaw is the absence of any context of how the characters ended up tangled with each other on the dramatic events that trigger the story, beforehand or in flashbacks.
It will then explore difficult choices made by all those involved, who also comprise families and other people, exploring angles around the prosecution of the crime and its wranglings.
The major difference for other typical courtroom dramas is that 'Common' is more concerned on the tensions that arise between co- conspirators.
Acting is decent, and sometimes even good. Editing is also well-done considering the profile of the movie. The end result is pleasant and it does give food for thought regarding a specific controversial feature of the law that is obviously conveyed as negative in the movie.
The major flaw is the absence of any context of how the characters ended up tangled with each other on the dramatic events that trigger the story, beforehand or in flashbacks.
Jimmy McGovern always hits the nail on the head. this film explores joint enterprise. i didnt know that the law was from the 1800's . there again what does the ordinary person in the street know about the law. Its a sad story but happens quite a lot. every parents nightmare. Great acting all round. You wont forget this film in a hurry.
Stumbled upon this this morning and stuck with it as part of my lazy Sunday and oh my God I am so glad and privileged that I did as this is is a brilliant thought provoking insight into the British judicial system, Some brilliant acting performances help tell a story of how an "innocent" trip to a pizza shop results in so many lives being changed forever as the innocent trip becomes something far more sinister!
Did you know
- TriviaThe voice on the soundtrack is that of legendary singer and songwriter Robert Wyatt.
- ConnectionsFeatured in Remembers...: Jimmy McGovern Remembers... Common (2025)
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content