Street Trash
- 2024
- 1h 25m
IMDb RATING
4.5/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
A group of homeless misfits must fight for survival when they discover a plot to exterminate every homeless person in the city.A group of homeless misfits must fight for survival when they discover a plot to exterminate every homeless person in the city.A group of homeless misfits must fight for survival when they discover a plot to exterminate every homeless person in the city.
Featured reviews
The original Street Trash from 1987 is a monolithic case in the sense that it notably conjured some of the most iconic imagery in perhaps the entire history of TRASH CINEMA. It's concept is also as perfect as one gets for this sort of film. But, what people don't mention as much is that, outside of it's iconic hyper-colored melt sequences, it's a TERRIBLE movie.
So, here, 37 years later, we have a remake coming out of South Africa, and honestly, I think it's kind of exactly what I hoped it would be. Though it's still blatantly and seemingly purposefully a "bad movie", it's very self-aware, so much that the random blue puppet-like creature who only appears to crack bottom-tier jokes about fellatio when hobos are hallucinating after drinking too much "Viper" is fully fitting and acceptable. While it's often being marketed as a remake, I think it best to think of it more as a spiritual sequel, sort of like Evil Dead (2013). It's packed to the brim with bright neon melt sequences, bodies dripping every colored ooze you can imagine, front to back. Most of the jokes are so bad that you can actually appreciate them for being so consistent, even if you're not laughing, but bad jokes aside, the whole thing feels really inspired and pretty fresh. Even the characters, albeit strong acting ability, manage to each have quite a lot of charisma, often making this feel like some gnarly Saturday morning cartoon from the late 80's or early 90's.
For fans of trash horror, and cult classics in general, this is 100% worthy of your viewing. All fans of the original should absolutely see it as well. For anyone else, probably not. This is the epitome of a movie made for a SPECIFIC AUDIENCE.
So, here, 37 years later, we have a remake coming out of South Africa, and honestly, I think it's kind of exactly what I hoped it would be. Though it's still blatantly and seemingly purposefully a "bad movie", it's very self-aware, so much that the random blue puppet-like creature who only appears to crack bottom-tier jokes about fellatio when hobos are hallucinating after drinking too much "Viper" is fully fitting and acceptable. While it's often being marketed as a remake, I think it best to think of it more as a spiritual sequel, sort of like Evil Dead (2013). It's packed to the brim with bright neon melt sequences, bodies dripping every colored ooze you can imagine, front to back. Most of the jokes are so bad that you can actually appreciate them for being so consistent, even if you're not laughing, but bad jokes aside, the whole thing feels really inspired and pretty fresh. Even the characters, albeit strong acting ability, manage to each have quite a lot of charisma, often making this feel like some gnarly Saturday morning cartoon from the late 80's or early 90's.
For fans of trash horror, and cult classics in general, this is 100% worthy of your viewing. All fans of the original should absolutely see it as well. For anyone else, probably not. This is the epitome of a movie made for a SPECIFIC AUDIENCE.
Ive just finished watching this remake/sequel and I have to say the dialogue & story are very weak. To me it felt like the script (if there was one) was loosely put together on set, my 10 year old can write better dialogue than this! I enjoyed the director's previous film Fried Barry as it was something I hadnt seen before and wasnt trying to be anything it wasnt so I had high expectations for this film of his.
Sadly this film is a miss for me, didnt like the cast or the FXs, everything was just to obvious however saying that it may pick up a Razzie award which could do it some justice down the road.
Sadly this film is a miss for me, didnt like the cast or the FXs, everything was just to obvious however saying that it may pick up a Razzie award which could do it some justice down the road.
Perhaps I'm old school now but the 1987 original had a certain charm to it, gooey effects, a wild script with a band of actors pulling together to bring it to life, for which all with great aplomb.
Rookie Director Jim Muro excelled with his steadicam work capturing every nuanced moment.
Now moving onto Ryan Kruger's remake or sequel or whatever it wishes to be. Despite some lovely little nods to the original, it quickly falls apart, true the effects remain suitable gross but it lacks the sparkle of what made Muro's an everlasting gem.
Poorly scripted with some wild misfires, the storyline is strained with a storyline that pretty much goes nowhere!
I do question why the character of Chef is Jewish when the movie is set in Cape Town, the actor playing Ronald seems to be acting as if he's in another movie, he seems decent enough but he doesn't belong here.
Having been looking forward to this, it'll never be watched again.
Rookie Director Jim Muro excelled with his steadicam work capturing every nuanced moment.
Now moving onto Ryan Kruger's remake or sequel or whatever it wishes to be. Despite some lovely little nods to the original, it quickly falls apart, true the effects remain suitable gross but it lacks the sparkle of what made Muro's an everlasting gem.
Poorly scripted with some wild misfires, the storyline is strained with a storyline that pretty much goes nowhere!
I do question why the character of Chef is Jewish when the movie is set in Cape Town, the actor playing Ronald seems to be acting as if he's in another movie, he seems decent enough but he doesn't belong here.
Having been looking forward to this, it'll never be watched again.
This is a remake, reboot of the original 1987 film. The original film was a very funny and disgusting 80"s splatter film. This is a little more story oriented and more of a dystopian sci fi action film where the homeless are a target by the system and they fight back. This is very different from the original film and has more social commentary. It's still very tongue in cheek and does maintain the disgusting splatter effects where people's skin melts and explodes. For what this is, it's still a decent watch. However I feel the 2024 version riffs more from Paul Verhoven's Robocop than the original film. The acting performances are mostly disposable and inferior to the gore. If you enjoy lighthearted splatter flicks with a good amount of action, you have a good chance enjoying this. I did find this to be amusing but I much prefer the original film as it's more unique and better executed.
The gore in this one is very unreal compared to the original and the acting in this is way worse feels like a cheap knock off of the original film sadly I couldnt finish it, it's that bad. The jokes are unfunny and dumb, anybody who says this is better then the original is lying. I give this a 3 out of 10 for trying.
Did you know
- TriviaA sequel to the classic 1987 movie of the same name.
- ConnectionsReferences Fried Barry (2020)
- How long is Street Trash?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Уличный мусор
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $1,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 25m(85 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content