IMDb RATING
7.2/10
1.7K
YOUR RATING
Two brothers and their wives meet for dinner to discuss how to deal with a violent crime committed by their children.Two brothers and their wives meet for dinner to discuss how to deal with a violent crime committed by their children.Two brothers and their wives meet for dinner to discuss how to deal with a violent crime committed by their children.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 2 nominations total
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Amidst the vast ocean of streaming "content" and "popcorn" movies, this gem of a primal "human drama" from Korea manages to stand out and stir my emotions.
I feel emotionally invested in all the characters, their reactions and dilemmas. "A Normal Family" may start slow and unveils its story at its own pace. And unlike "Anatomy Of A Fall", there's no burning question to hook and hold it viewers captive throughout. But it's one of the rare films that manages to make me put myself in every character's shoes, mind and brain - wondering what to do next and feeling the anguish.
Despite the fact that the original source material (The Dinner by Dutch novelist Herman Koch) revolves only around dinners, this film adaptation expands the story brilliantly and embed itself with powerful cultural nuances from beginning to end.
The direction is confident and the cast is all top-notch, portraying all the characters with palpable depth and convincing emotional development throughout the film.
There are two twists in the final moments of this cinematic gem of 2024. The first shook me. But I saw the second one coming. It didn't diminish the power of this film though. I'm so glad to have watched this film and so thankful to all involved in making it.
This film makes me renews my faith in cinema and its immense role in not just entertaining us but illuminating issues we should pay more attention to.
I feel emotionally invested in all the characters, their reactions and dilemmas. "A Normal Family" may start slow and unveils its story at its own pace. And unlike "Anatomy Of A Fall", there's no burning question to hook and hold it viewers captive throughout. But it's one of the rare films that manages to make me put myself in every character's shoes, mind and brain - wondering what to do next and feeling the anguish.
Despite the fact that the original source material (The Dinner by Dutch novelist Herman Koch) revolves only around dinners, this film adaptation expands the story brilliantly and embed itself with powerful cultural nuances from beginning to end.
The direction is confident and the cast is all top-notch, portraying all the characters with palpable depth and convincing emotional development throughout the film.
There are two twists in the final moments of this cinematic gem of 2024. The first shook me. But I saw the second one coming. It didn't diminish the power of this film though. I'm so glad to have watched this film and so thankful to all involved in making it.
This film makes me renews my faith in cinema and its immense role in not just entertaining us but illuminating issues we should pay more attention to.
I like how the narrative explores lives of two brothers, each with a distinct perspective on life and livelihood.
Although they share the same mother and were raised in the same household, their ethical frameworks contradict each other sharply.
However, when an unexpected incident involving their children threatens to disrupt the family's reputation & unity, both of their moral beliefs are put to the test.
This leads to heated discussions and thereby escalate tensions, as they try to grapple with their inner conflict between protecting their family and standing up for what is ethically correct.
The film effectively captures this particular dynamic, but it lacks the sophistication and emotional depth that such complex stories demand in order to leave a mark and resonate with the audience.
I wish the writing or rather the execution of it all packed more punch.
Although they share the same mother and were raised in the same household, their ethical frameworks contradict each other sharply.
However, when an unexpected incident involving their children threatens to disrupt the family's reputation & unity, both of their moral beliefs are put to the test.
This leads to heated discussions and thereby escalate tensions, as they try to grapple with their inner conflict between protecting their family and standing up for what is ethically correct.
The film effectively captures this particular dynamic, but it lacks the sophistication and emotional depth that such complex stories demand in order to leave a mark and resonate with the audience.
I wish the writing or rather the execution of it all packed more punch.
10plupu66
Director Hur Jin Ho takes inspiration from Dutch writer's Norman Koch's bestseller "The Dinner" and constructs a very interesting film immersed in Korean culture but very universal in scope. He uses the essential elements of the book's plot but streamlines it to make it more meaningful, more powerful. (It is not often that a film takes the plot of a book and makes it better in its screen version.)
Without sermonizing or taking sides, the films ask questions about society, justice, morality, parenthood, values, beliefs, entitlement . By testing the moral strengths of the protagonists, the film makes the audience question their own mettle in limit situations.
The imagery is strong enough, but not overwhelming to allow the viewers the personal space to make their own opinions. So is the acting - convincing, without going overboard.
After Parasite, I think this is another homerun of the Korean cinema. I would strongly recommend it for viewing in film clubs in universities - our young generation need to see it.
Without sermonizing or taking sides, the films ask questions about society, justice, morality, parenthood, values, beliefs, entitlement . By testing the moral strengths of the protagonists, the film makes the audience question their own mettle in limit situations.
The imagery is strong enough, but not overwhelming to allow the viewers the personal space to make their own opinions. So is the acting - convincing, without going overboard.
After Parasite, I think this is another homerun of the Korean cinema. I would strongly recommend it for viewing in film clubs in universities - our young generation need to see it.
Finally watched the film I had been waiting 2 years for, but after watching it, I couldn't remember or understand why I was so eagerly anticipating it.
It stars excellent actors. Their performances are beyond any question or reproach. Everything is excellent and looks as natural as is fundamentally possible.
A rich picture. The cinematography is better than just good.
An interesting plot. It would seem that everything is perfectly written, told, and shown, but for some reason, it doesn't grip me at all. Even though it's an excellent, tense drama about those same class inequalities in Korea and family relationships.
For some reason, from the very first frame, I had a feeling that I had already seen this film. Many scenes seem to be copied from other films. Even many of the cinematographic choices seemed like copies. This created a feeling that there was no need to watch further.
Perhaps if this were the first film on this or a similar theme, it would have engaged me much more. As it is now, it's more of a reminder of pressing problems. Problems not only in Korea but all over the world.
In terms of the themes it raises, it can be compared to "Parasite." Only Bong Joon-ho presents it positively, with humor and in bright tones, while Ho Jin-ho has a heavier and more oppressive atmosphere, where dark shades predominate for most of the runtime. At the same time, when the screen shows a bright sunny day with vivid colors and light, the feeling from it is completely different, opposite, which only heightens the tension of the entire picture.
"A Normal Family" overall seems more realistic and plausible.
The viewer can easily associate themselves with a character, or maybe even with several.
As for sympathy or empathy, it's a debatable question, perhaps even individual.
The film is aimed at a mass audience. It absolutely must be seen by everyone, not only adults but also teenagers/children, because there is food for thought here for all.
The film is a modern adaptation of the unchanging problems of all people, regardless of the season or what is happening in the world, so that adults don't forget, and the new generation learns and is aware.
It stars excellent actors. Their performances are beyond any question or reproach. Everything is excellent and looks as natural as is fundamentally possible.
A rich picture. The cinematography is better than just good.
An interesting plot. It would seem that everything is perfectly written, told, and shown, but for some reason, it doesn't grip me at all. Even though it's an excellent, tense drama about those same class inequalities in Korea and family relationships.
For some reason, from the very first frame, I had a feeling that I had already seen this film. Many scenes seem to be copied from other films. Even many of the cinematographic choices seemed like copies. This created a feeling that there was no need to watch further.
Perhaps if this were the first film on this or a similar theme, it would have engaged me much more. As it is now, it's more of a reminder of pressing problems. Problems not only in Korea but all over the world.
In terms of the themes it raises, it can be compared to "Parasite." Only Bong Joon-ho presents it positively, with humor and in bright tones, while Ho Jin-ho has a heavier and more oppressive atmosphere, where dark shades predominate for most of the runtime. At the same time, when the screen shows a bright sunny day with vivid colors and light, the feeling from it is completely different, opposite, which only heightens the tension of the entire picture.
"A Normal Family" overall seems more realistic and plausible.
The viewer can easily associate themselves with a character, or maybe even with several.
As for sympathy or empathy, it's a debatable question, perhaps even individual.
The film is aimed at a mass audience. It absolutely must be seen by everyone, not only adults but also teenagers/children, because there is food for thought here for all.
The film is a modern adaptation of the unchanging problems of all people, regardless of the season or what is happening in the world, so that adults don't forget, and the new generation learns and is aware.
A K-drama that examines if being on your kid's side sometimes means realizing they need punishment, even if it's likely that it would be severe. I loved the setup to this and how it was prefaced/mirrored in a shocking road rage incident. I also liked how the characters of the four parents evolved over the film, and how emotionally tense it got.
Initially we have the good doctor who saves lives even if patients don't have insurance, and his middle-aged wife who doesn't put on airs despite their wealth. He wants his son to be a man of value even if he doesn't get into a great college. They're contrasted by his brother, a lawyer who doesn't seem to have conscience about defending people who have no remorse over killing, and his much younger second wife who is very conscious of her appearance. They spoil their daughter rotten and spend lavish sums of money on fine wine and gourmet restaurants.
When their own kids commit a violent assault on a homeless man, it seems like we know how each of these people is going to act, but we don't. We soon see different sides to them as they wrestle with love for their kids vs doing the right thing. Unfortunately this strength became a weakness when it was taken just a little too far. I just couldn't buy the evolution for the doctor in the final act, which seemed unlikely given what had come before it.
Still worth seeing, as it touches on internet culture and bullying as things that erode basic humanity, as well as how wealth and the power it brings corrupts, especially if one is handed everything in life.
Initially we have the good doctor who saves lives even if patients don't have insurance, and his middle-aged wife who doesn't put on airs despite their wealth. He wants his son to be a man of value even if he doesn't get into a great college. They're contrasted by his brother, a lawyer who doesn't seem to have conscience about defending people who have no remorse over killing, and his much younger second wife who is very conscious of her appearance. They spoil their daughter rotten and spend lavish sums of money on fine wine and gourmet restaurants.
When their own kids commit a violent assault on a homeless man, it seems like we know how each of these people is going to act, but we don't. We soon see different sides to them as they wrestle with love for their kids vs doing the right thing. Unfortunately this strength became a weakness when it was taken just a little too far. I just couldn't buy the evolution for the doctor in the final act, which seemed unlikely given what had come before it.
Still worth seeing, as it touches on internet culture and bullying as things that erode basic humanity, as well as how wealth and the power it brings corrupts, especially if one is handed everything in life.
Did you know
- TriviaThis is the fourth adaptation of Dutch writer Herman Koch's 2009 novel "The Dinner". Director Hur Jin-ho admitted to take inspiration from the Italian version the most, but changed the brother's jobs to better fit Korean modern society. The title "The Dinner" sounds awkward in Korean so it was changed to the final one, which translates to "A Normal Family" in English.
- ConnectionsVersion of Het diner (2013)
- How long is A Normal Family?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $15,825
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $15,825
- Apr 27, 2025
- Gross worldwide
- $6,386,685
- Runtime
- 1h 56m(116 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content