Japan rose technologically after war. Sony aimed to collaborate with Nintendo in video games' rise. After betrayal, Sony founded its successful PlayStation console line, competing with Ninte... Read allJapan rose technologically after war. Sony aimed to collaborate with Nintendo in video games' rise. After betrayal, Sony founded its successful PlayStation console line, competing with Nintendo.Japan rose technologically after war. Sony aimed to collaborate with Nintendo in video games' rise. After betrayal, Sony founded its successful PlayStation console line, competing with Nintendo.
Photos
Mark Cerny
- Self - Games Dev
- (archive footage)
Bill Gates
- Self - Co-Founder of Microsoft
- (archive footage)
Ken Kutaragi
- Self - Former CEO of Sony
- (archive footage)
Akio Morita
- Self - Co-Founder of Sony
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Nice little story about the Playstations history which gets to the core subject surprisingly fast, without dragging it's heels. But it suffers 2 major flaws:1) this annoying modern documentary need to swap between nobody's offering 10, 15 seconds of dialogue one after the other. Just give us 1 presenter who we can associate with! 2) the sound editing. It is utterly dreadful, to the point where you can't even hear what the nobody's are saying. They no doubt feel this adds an edge to it, an interesting twist. It doesn't. It completely ruins what could have been a nice little documentary. 3 out of 10 is being generous.
I absolutely love video game documentaries, but like many people have said whoever the sound engineer was for this film should never work in movies again. It's impossible to listen at some points. There's some great archive footage but at other points they'll be talking about something like the Super Nintendo from 30 years ago but they show an unboxing of a brand new Super Nintendo mini. Doesn't make sense. The young lady with the pink hair who seems to be a video game historian is easy to listen to but she makes two false claims that were obviously not fact-checked and that any person who has played video games knows are either patently false or at best, misleading.
When I saw this suggested to me on Amazon Prime, I immediately dived in, eager to see what it had to offer. As an avid gamer since the '80s, the premise seemed right up my alley. However, my excitement quickly turned to disappointment due to the abysmal sound quality. The background music was so overpowering that it completely drowned out the dialogue. It was frustrating to the point where even the subtitles couldn't capture what was being said. How this glaring issue was overlooked and the show released in such a state is beyond me. This major mistake significantly impacted my viewing experience, making it difficult to enjoy the content.
This documentary offers nothing you most likely already didn't know about the history of the Playstation.
It's presented through a couple of no-bodies being interviewed and sharing their useless nostalgia stories and uncaptivating personal histories that come off more vein than anything else.
They just talk about each launch of the new systems and mention a couple of leading games, while obviously not being allowed to talk about the games consumers where really obtaining the consoles to play.
It's also got quite some misleading parts to it, in particular one of them claiming the PS1 had better graphics than the Nintendo 64... yeah, nah a umm, 32 bit system vs a 64 bit is not going to have better graphics. What they're failing to admit is the PS1 was easily chipped to run bootleg games, where as the Nintendo 64 wasn't able to be modified like that, and that's how the PS1 outsold Nintendo's 64 console. It wasn't from it being a better console or had vcd.
Also, the sound editing during this entire thing is atrocious. At points you can't hear what someone's saying because music is drowning it out, and it's annoying as bleep that way the sound goes up and down and has no constant level. Very poor job on the audio all through out this pointless documentary from the pov of a couple of nobodies.
It's presented through a couple of no-bodies being interviewed and sharing their useless nostalgia stories and uncaptivating personal histories that come off more vein than anything else.
They just talk about each launch of the new systems and mention a couple of leading games, while obviously not being allowed to talk about the games consumers where really obtaining the consoles to play.
It's also got quite some misleading parts to it, in particular one of them claiming the PS1 had better graphics than the Nintendo 64... yeah, nah a umm, 32 bit system vs a 64 bit is not going to have better graphics. What they're failing to admit is the PS1 was easily chipped to run bootleg games, where as the Nintendo 64 wasn't able to be modified like that, and that's how the PS1 outsold Nintendo's 64 console. It wasn't from it being a better console or had vcd.
Also, the sound editing during this entire thing is atrocious. At points you can't hear what someone's saying because music is drowning it out, and it's annoying as bleep that way the sound goes up and down and has no constant level. Very poor job on the audio all through out this pointless documentary from the pov of a couple of nobodies.
Avoid at all costs. Just don't even bother.
This isn't a "documentary". It may contain some information, but seriously just go on Wikipedia and read for it.
It's a mess of AI-generated voices, weird and pointless visual effects that contribute nothing to the telling.
Newsflash, algorithms can't make movies. Not watchable ones, anyway.
Perhaps it is supposed to cater to the Null-Attention-Span generation? Well guess what, they'd never watch a movie anyway. Unless it's good...
A good movie will catch people's attention, even if it's a documentary. But it needs to be an actual movie, and it needs to be actually good. This is neither. Calling it a disgrace feels almost laudatory.
This isn't a "documentary". It may contain some information, but seriously just go on Wikipedia and read for it.
It's a mess of AI-generated voices, weird and pointless visual effects that contribute nothing to the telling.
Newsflash, algorithms can't make movies. Not watchable ones, anyway.
Perhaps it is supposed to cater to the Null-Attention-Span generation? Well guess what, they'd never watch a movie anyway. Unless it's good...
A good movie will catch people's attention, even if it's a documentary. But it needs to be an actual movie, and it needs to be actually good. This is neither. Calling it a disgrace feels almost laudatory.
Did you know
- TriviaThe sound editor of this documentary was deaf.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- £100,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 47m
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content