Japan rose technologically after war. Sony aimed to collaborate with Nintendo in video games' rise. After betrayal, Sony founded its successful PlayStation console line, competing with Ninte... Read allJapan rose technologically after war. Sony aimed to collaborate with Nintendo in video games' rise. After betrayal, Sony founded its successful PlayStation console line, competing with Nintendo.Japan rose technologically after war. Sony aimed to collaborate with Nintendo in video games' rise. After betrayal, Sony founded its successful PlayStation console line, competing with Nintendo.
Photos
Mark Cerny
- Self - Games Dev
- (archive footage)
Bill Gates
- Self - Co-Founder of Microsoft
- (archive footage)
Ken Kutaragi
- Self - Former CEO of Sony
- (archive footage)
Akio Morita
- Self - Co-Founder of Sony
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Avoid at all costs. Just don't even bother.
This isn't a "documentary". It may contain some information, but seriously just go on Wikipedia and read for it.
It's a mess of AI-generated voices, weird and pointless visual effects that contribute nothing to the telling.
Newsflash, algorithms can't make movies. Not watchable ones, anyway.
Perhaps it is supposed to cater to the Null-Attention-Span generation? Well guess what, they'd never watch a movie anyway. Unless it's good...
A good movie will catch people's attention, even if it's a documentary. But it needs to be an actual movie, and it needs to be actually good. This is neither. Calling it a disgrace feels almost laudatory.
This isn't a "documentary". It may contain some information, but seriously just go on Wikipedia and read for it.
It's a mess of AI-generated voices, weird and pointless visual effects that contribute nothing to the telling.
Newsflash, algorithms can't make movies. Not watchable ones, anyway.
Perhaps it is supposed to cater to the Null-Attention-Span generation? Well guess what, they'd never watch a movie anyway. Unless it's good...
A good movie will catch people's attention, even if it's a documentary. But it needs to be an actual movie, and it needs to be actually good. This is neither. Calling it a disgrace feels almost laudatory.
This documentary offers nothing you most likely already didn't know about the history of the Playstation.
It's presented through a couple of no-bodies being interviewed and sharing their useless nostalgia stories and uncaptivating personal histories that come off more vein than anything else.
They just talk about each launch of the new systems and mention a couple of leading games, while obviously not being allowed to talk about the games consumers where really obtaining the consoles to play.
It's also got quite some misleading parts to it, in particular one of them claiming the PS1 had better graphics than the Nintendo 64... yeah, nah a umm, 32 bit system vs a 64 bit is not going to have better graphics. What they're failing to admit is the PS1 was easily chipped to run bootleg games, where as the Nintendo 64 wasn't able to be modified like that, and that's how the PS1 outsold Nintendo's 64 console. It wasn't from it being a better console or had vcd.
Also, the sound editing during this entire thing is atrocious. At points you can't hear what someone's saying because music is drowning it out, and it's annoying as bleep that way the sound goes up and down and has no constant level. Very poor job on the audio all through out this pointless documentary from the pov of a couple of nobodies.
It's presented through a couple of no-bodies being interviewed and sharing their useless nostalgia stories and uncaptivating personal histories that come off more vein than anything else.
They just talk about each launch of the new systems and mention a couple of leading games, while obviously not being allowed to talk about the games consumers where really obtaining the consoles to play.
It's also got quite some misleading parts to it, in particular one of them claiming the PS1 had better graphics than the Nintendo 64... yeah, nah a umm, 32 bit system vs a 64 bit is not going to have better graphics. What they're failing to admit is the PS1 was easily chipped to run bootleg games, where as the Nintendo 64 wasn't able to be modified like that, and that's how the PS1 outsold Nintendo's 64 console. It wasn't from it being a better console or had vcd.
Also, the sound editing during this entire thing is atrocious. At points you can't hear what someone's saying because music is drowning it out, and it's annoying as bleep that way the sound goes up and down and has no constant level. Very poor job on the audio all through out this pointless documentary from the pov of a couple of nobodies.
I don't know who thought it be a good idea to release this documentary in it's current state.
No build up, story is rushed and all over the place. Narrator sounds like Ben Stein. The console comparisons of the time barely, if at all, mention main competitors like Xbox or Sega. It seems to really focus on Nintendo the entire time, and with little mention of a main competitor, N64.
Probably the worst audio mixing I have ever heard. There are amateur youtubers who would do a better job then they did. It really is atrocious. Double audio, echoing in speech, music drowning out interviewees, random music in odd places, volume level fluctuations.
Take a pass on this one. Or watch video game historian on YouTube to see how a real video game doc should be done.
No build up, story is rushed and all over the place. Narrator sounds like Ben Stein. The console comparisons of the time barely, if at all, mention main competitors like Xbox or Sega. It seems to really focus on Nintendo the entire time, and with little mention of a main competitor, N64.
Probably the worst audio mixing I have ever heard. There are amateur youtubers who would do a better job then they did. It really is atrocious. Double audio, echoing in speech, music drowning out interviewees, random music in odd places, volume level fluctuations.
Take a pass on this one. Or watch video game historian on YouTube to see how a real video game doc should be done.
Quite interesting content, and I wanted to enjoy it, but completely unwatchable die to the sound. Sometimes the background music drowned out the people talking. Awful.
I don't know why the sound was so bad. Watching view a Bose soundbar with rear speakers, but had to turn the rear speakers down otherwise there was an awful echo on the narrator's voice. Also, the actual quality of the sound is tinny and distorted.
I managed to watch about twenty minutes before it became too irritating. Even changed tge sound settings but it didn't get any better.
Very disappointing in what could have been a good documentary.
I don't know why the sound was so bad. Watching view a Bose soundbar with rear speakers, but had to turn the rear speakers down otherwise there was an awful echo on the narrator's voice. Also, the actual quality of the sound is tinny and distorted.
I managed to watch about twenty minutes before it became too irritating. Even changed tge sound settings but it didn't get any better.
Very disappointing in what could have been a good documentary.
When I saw this suggested to me on Amazon Prime, I immediately dived in, eager to see what it had to offer. As an avid gamer since the '80s, the premise seemed right up my alley. However, my excitement quickly turned to disappointment due to the abysmal sound quality. The background music was so overpowering that it completely drowned out the dialogue. It was frustrating to the point where even the subtitles couldn't capture what was being said. How this glaring issue was overlooked and the show released in such a state is beyond me. This major mistake significantly impacted my viewing experience, making it difficult to enjoy the content.
Did you know
- TriviaThe sound editor of this documentary was deaf.
Details
Box office
- Budget
- £100,000 (estimated)
- Runtime47 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content