Four American citizens with extrasensory abilities are forced into a secret U.S. government program that transports them to alternate planes of existence in order to confront vicious paranor... Read allFour American citizens with extrasensory abilities are forced into a secret U.S. government program that transports them to alternate planes of existence in order to confront vicious paranormal threats and terminate them.Four American citizens with extrasensory abilities are forced into a secret U.S. government program that transports them to alternate planes of existence in order to confront vicious paranormal threats and terminate them.
Chris W. Greenfield
- Government Technician
- (as Chris G. Greenfield)
Shaun LaDue
- Government Scientist #2
- (as Shaun Ladue)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I say one thing about this movie, it remind me of the horror film I saw a long time ago called Halloween. I really like the devil or monster in this movie and that it doesn't show up very much, putting the viewer on the edge of your seat. Kind of like the movie Halloween, where you not see that killer all of the times. I believe this movie to be very interesting from the psychical standpoint, with the governmental agencies and the dreamworld. In Russia, I wish we had movies more like this. Enjoyed this movie quite much and probably might be good television series show.
I don't understand how person can rate movie one or two star from an intelligent perspective. There's good deal of storyline in movie and the characters of actors are well done. Thoroughly outlined plot and not in you face and over the top action.
I don't understand how person can rate movie one or two star from an intelligent perspective. There's good deal of storyline in movie and the characters of actors are well done. Thoroughly outlined plot and not in you face and over the top action.
I actually watch a LOT of horror from the classics (The Black Room, White Zombie) to modern horror (Spring, Sinister)and I love everything from psychological to gory to downright creepy. Some I hated and some I really loved. I also review horror movies because I find that everyone has diverse tastes in what they find good and then some people are paid to give good reviews which cheats the viewer and they are stuck watching a train wreck and it's not even an entertaining one. Also I know that on here the directors get the actors and their friends to give the movie a high rating and write good reviews because that encourages other people to watch the movie (I fell for it), which is a really good system if the movie was actually worth watching. This movie just happens to be one of those train wrecks I mentioned earlier. The concept was good but it was executed poorly. The acting was so so bad. The staticy flickering camera was annoying because it was constantly happening. I get that it is supposed to be found footage but come on! The sound was horrible and the "demon/monster" sounded like a bleating goat. The story was disjointed and half the time you didn't know what was going on which led more to confusion than creepiness. I almost felt like I was watching a really badly done rendition of the Power Rangers meet Evil Big Foot. Not once did I feel creeped out or was I on the edge of my seat. This movie did not hold my attention and I actually had to force myself to sit through it. Not because it was scary but because I was getting so frustrated with that stupid flickering camera and confusion about what was really going on. This movie lacks any kind of intellectual stimulus. If you just want something to pass the time or for background noise this is great. If you actually want to sit down and watch a good indie horror I would pass this one up. And that's an honest answer.
This is hands down the worst attempt at a movie I've ever seen. The story was horrible written, the directing was awful, and the acting was just atrocious. I hope for the sake of all movie viewers in the world that nobody who was involved in the spat ever gets another job in the industry. I am at a complete loss. I don't even know how to put into words how bad this film really is. The story goes absolutely nowhere. It is just non stop static on the screen attempting to create some suspense and they failed miserably at that also. The news story that is covering this project does an extremely bad job at describing what they are actually reporting. And to top off all of the bad decisions in making this film people actually seen the finished product and patted themselves on the back and said "good job guys, lets release it". Sad....Just sad.
Something to keep you on the edge of your seat for a change. Unfortunately, there are too few movies that can accomplish this anymore. Not your typical film that uses trailers to lure you in to get you to watch the film, leaving you dozing or uninterested after the first twenty minutes. This film, uses techniques that many people are interested in, but know little to nothing about, the paranormal.
Too many modern movies are unintelligent, using high-tech CGI and other silly gadgetry to get you to watch their film without even giving a passing thought about the actual plot of the story. When did filmmaking go down the tubes - giving way to rubbish. This film uses simple, retro-style horror, allowing the audience to use their brain for a change. Don't watch this movie if you are not into using intelligence though, after all, it's meant to make you ponder the other realm, allowing us smart humans to question outside the box.
Too many modern movies are unintelligent, using high-tech CGI and other silly gadgetry to get you to watch their film without even giving a passing thought about the actual plot of the story. When did filmmaking go down the tubes - giving way to rubbish. This film uses simple, retro-style horror, allowing the audience to use their brain for a change. Don't watch this movie if you are not into using intelligence though, after all, it's meant to make you ponder the other realm, allowing us smart humans to question outside the box.
I bought this movie about a week ago. I wanted to come on here and explain a few things to reviewers prior to writing a bad review. First off, it's probably going to be somewhere between a "6" and an "8". I wouldn't give it either a nine or ten, but that's just me. I've seen a lot of other users here in the IMDb have given it just that, 9s & 10s. I'm not them, so I don't know what they enjoy. Speaking on behalf of myself who once worked for an independent film business almost fifteen years ago as an executive producer, I keep abreast of the independent market.
First off, let me state this, unless you are a somewhat intelligent person, or have worked in the film business, you can't possibly imagine what the mental and even physical cost is for an independent filmmaker. The difficulties in making a film on a lower budget takes ambition and above all, courage. The ability to stick by something for an endless amount of time is not for the faint of heart. Nocturne Six is unlike other independent movies that I've not only made, but have watched. I would have to say from a very critical point of view, there are most likely only 9 total movies that fall into my personal category that make my top 10 favorite independent releases. Nocturne Six is one of them as of now.
Many films today must adhere to a new market of individuals, sadly. It's not much about story lines and intelligence within films anymore. Screenwriters must always be thinking outside the box for ways to keep the unaware public at bay to follow through with their movie experience. If a screenwriter/s can get their point across without all the glitz and glam of explosions and shotgun blasts, then they've accomplished their objective and then some for those of us film lovers that actually know and understand, and even appreciate what were taking into our brains.
Nocturne Six for me as an "unofficial" film critic was not just simply executed with what these filmmakers were using, but they brought a fascinating plot of modern science and culture, and the ever-growing world of paranormal science to life in just under two-hours. Many movies that I have watched can't seem to get their point across in the time they've been approved for and still remain under budget. I find modern filmmaking to be appalling sometimes, in that the fact we are willing to hand out $60million to a "so-called trusted" director just because he's achieved the same thing over and over again. It's all about the "Flash! Bang! Boom!" effect, rather than the intellectual movie experience anymore. Mass-produced movies are in your face, and it's all about the money and the trend. Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate what goes into making these films, but when did we stop rewarding those who actually have something special to say through art and craftsmanship, and start rewarding those who use the same gimmicks over and over again, the same cookie-cutter hum-drum nonsense? From a technical aspect, I loved how Nocturne Six utilized many modern-day library footage, referenced modern government agencies and had an all-around horror/sci-fi affect.
Personally, I just can't fathom someone giving this movie anything below a six. You have to be somewhat reasonably intelligent to understand this movie, and if you are, then you'll understand to issue it a respectful number, above that of "5".
First off, let me state this, unless you are a somewhat intelligent person, or have worked in the film business, you can't possibly imagine what the mental and even physical cost is for an independent filmmaker. The difficulties in making a film on a lower budget takes ambition and above all, courage. The ability to stick by something for an endless amount of time is not for the faint of heart. Nocturne Six is unlike other independent movies that I've not only made, but have watched. I would have to say from a very critical point of view, there are most likely only 9 total movies that fall into my personal category that make my top 10 favorite independent releases. Nocturne Six is one of them as of now.
Many films today must adhere to a new market of individuals, sadly. It's not much about story lines and intelligence within films anymore. Screenwriters must always be thinking outside the box for ways to keep the unaware public at bay to follow through with their movie experience. If a screenwriter/s can get their point across without all the glitz and glam of explosions and shotgun blasts, then they've accomplished their objective and then some for those of us film lovers that actually know and understand, and even appreciate what were taking into our brains.
Nocturne Six for me as an "unofficial" film critic was not just simply executed with what these filmmakers were using, but they brought a fascinating plot of modern science and culture, and the ever-growing world of paranormal science to life in just under two-hours. Many movies that I have watched can't seem to get their point across in the time they've been approved for and still remain under budget. I find modern filmmaking to be appalling sometimes, in that the fact we are willing to hand out $60million to a "so-called trusted" director just because he's achieved the same thing over and over again. It's all about the "Flash! Bang! Boom!" effect, rather than the intellectual movie experience anymore. Mass-produced movies are in your face, and it's all about the money and the trend. Don't get me wrong, I can appreciate what goes into making these films, but when did we stop rewarding those who actually have something special to say through art and craftsmanship, and start rewarding those who use the same gimmicks over and over again, the same cookie-cutter hum-drum nonsense? From a technical aspect, I loved how Nocturne Six utilized many modern-day library footage, referenced modern government agencies and had an all-around horror/sci-fi affect.
Personally, I just can't fathom someone giving this movie anything below a six. You have to be somewhat reasonably intelligent to understand this movie, and if you are, then you'll understand to issue it a respectful number, above that of "5".
Details
Box office
- Budget
- CA$25,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content