[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysToronto Int'l Film FestivalIMDb Stars to WatchSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Hostile Dimensions

  • 2023
  • 1h 20m
IMDb RATING
4.9/10
863
YOUR RATING
Hostile Dimensions (2023)
Two documentary filmmakers travel through alternate dimensions to uncover the truth about a graffiti artist who has vanished.
Play trailer1:40
1 Video
31 Photos
Found Footage HorrorHorrorSci-Fi

Two documentary filmmakers travel through alternate dimensions to uncover the truth about a graffiti artist who has vanished.Two documentary filmmakers travel through alternate dimensions to uncover the truth about a graffiti artist who has vanished.Two documentary filmmakers travel through alternate dimensions to uncover the truth about a graffiti artist who has vanished.

  • Director
    • Graham Hughes
  • Writer
    • Graham Hughes
  • Stars
    • Stephen Beavis
    • Cedric Gall
    • Graham Hughes
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    4.9/10
    863
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Graham Hughes
    • Writer
      • Graham Hughes
    • Stars
      • Stephen Beavis
      • Cedric Gall
      • Graham Hughes
    • 17User reviews
    • 36Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
    • Awards
      • 1 win & 1 nomination total

    Videos1

    Official Trailer
    Trailer 1:40
    Official Trailer

    Photos31

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 27
    View Poster

    Top cast9

    Edit
    Stephen Beavis
    • Brian
    Cedric Gall
    • Cedric
    Graham Hughes
    • Not Brian
    Paddy Kondracki
    • Innis
    Annabel Logan
    • Sam
    Lucy the Dog
    • Dog…
    Josie Rogers
    • Emily
    Andy Stewart
    • Hand Head
    Joma West
    • Ash
    • Director
      • Graham Hughes
    • Writer
      • Graham Hughes
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews17

    4.9863
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    5biba_yu

    Good idea, not great exexution

    The idea of the movie and the concept are not really bad. It has some mystic feel to it and it kind of give a "backrooms" vibe, which is a nice start. The concept of door so another dimensions and backroom with Pandamonium and other things actually sound like a good idea.

    However... Acting is terrible. Sorry, I like when actors are normal looking people and it gives "real life" vibe instead of "movie" vibe if you know what I mean. I like the cheap look and normal looking people and kind of realistic surroundings. But, that does not excuse bad acting. The reactions of characters, the lines, are just bad, bad, bad, there is no realism no realistic lines or behavior nowhere to find. They do not have a shred of believability. It just looks like a student or school play.

    Cheap effects are also fine, don't mind it, but they didn't even try. It looks like this movie costs circa 500$ or so. There is barely anything that can not be cheaply built or made by some freeware 3D software. It's like they didn't even try.

    In conclusion, there is something there, and it's fun, but cheapness kind of killed this movie.
    2heatherworkmanrios

    It was so bad.

    I'm sorry, just being honest, it was terrible.

    The who faux documentary thing is far beyond played out, but I thought maybe, just maybe this one might be interesting. Nope.

    It just didn't make any sense, nothing was believable. (Yes I know sci-fi and fantasy don't have to be realistic, but they need to create a believable fantasy world). The acting was all over the place. Some good, some bad, mostly mediocre. No one reacts to anything the way you'd expect normal humans to react. It was just so bad. It really felt like I was watching the final group project for an undergrad cinema class. But, I paid for it. Ugh.
    3andrej-groups

    Well, well, well ... three holes in the ground!

    I'll give the crew a 3 because they seemed to have fun with it and I didn't just walk away but watched the whole thing.

    I have to say that I can't understand anyone who would give this a 5 or higher, let alone the critical acclaim it has received over on Rotten Tomatoes, but here we are, and such is life. In this respect it's not dissimilar (actually better because not as long and nowhere near as repetitive) to the also critically acclaimed "Hard to be a god", which I would have walked out off if my company - both of them! - hadn't fallen asleep.

    Portals, chalk circles, .... not even the the shaky cam work can be considered original, so I can't see how anyone would deem this innovative. Looks like something my kid and his mates could have done and had fun with (and I might even have praised them).
    6colorationco

    The Acting 😕

    I love movies like this! I don't care how slow burn or how low budget they are. This was pretty fun overall. I would def watch it if the premise sounds interesting to you. But go in w certain expectations.

    Two things for me I think: 1) The script seems like it needed a few more edits. It does feel like there are slightly too many things going on, but I don't think so. I think it just feels that way bc there needs to be better character distinction and understanding of each person's motives. There were some points where a character would say or do something that no human would want to say or do, just to get the plot where it was going. Therefore the character work just wasn't strong enough IMO.

    2) I feel bad but.. the acting. There are several times when these people have just witnessed something they could have never possibly imagined. Their brain should be breaking and they should have stunned tears in their eyes. But their reactions are just never proportionate to what's going on. Same goes for any "scary" parts. Instead of wide eyed, screaming, piss-your-pants level fear, it's like "run! Hurry! Close the door! Omg what was that, ew".

    Idk this needed to be focused grouped several more times. The premise and low budget effects and casual humor were really good though!
    3keioncook

    Good bones, Weak delivery.

    This film has a very good premise, but it miss it landing. The bones are good. I love other dimensions type stories, but this film lacks substance.

    My criticism have nothing to do with the low-budget aspect of the film. I don't need flashing CGI, or special effects; I use my imagination on novels all the time, so I can be drawn to a good story. However, there is basically no story here. You can watch the preview is that basically the whole movie. See this door, see it goes to different dimensions, see me run through it, see we find so random dude who happen to be expert at interdimensional doorway travel, see I am an expert at it now...

    My first issue is the acting is terrible. I seen better acting in high school plays. The actors to not delivery on emotion. So their reactions seem like people trying to act a part, rather than people just living their lives (especially, since this is a lost tape style movie, so they should come off as regular people).

    Next is the film is just weird. There are so many potholes that it just confusing. It hard to find people's motivation for their actions, so everything seems dumb and unbelievable.

    Related interests

    Manuela Velasco in [REC] (2007)
    Found Footage Horror
    Mia Farrow in Rosemary's Baby (1968)
    Horror
    James Earl Jones and David Prowse in L'Empire contre-attaque (1980)
    Sci-Fi

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      This film is part two of The 3/1 Trilogy, a thematically-linked series of found footage films involving similar cast and crew and shot within the director's flat.

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    FAQ13

    • How long is Hostile Dimensions?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • August 23, 2024 (United States)
    • Country of origin
      • United Kingdom
    • Official site
      • Official Amazon Link
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Враждебные измерения
    • Production company
      • Enlightened Monster Productions
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 20m(80 min)
    • Color
      • Color

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.