During the dissolution of the monasteries in the Tudor era, Matthew Shardlake is sent by Thomas Cromwell to investigate the death of a commissioner in a remote town of Scarnsea.During the dissolution of the monasteries in the Tudor era, Matthew Shardlake is sent by Thomas Cromwell to investigate the death of a commissioner in a remote town of Scarnsea.During the dissolution of the monasteries in the Tudor era, Matthew Shardlake is sent by Thomas Cromwell to investigate the death of a commissioner in a remote town of Scarnsea.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
I'm only one episode in. So far, the characterisation is good. The production values impressive and the direction stellar. Alas, already the immersion into the 16th century setting is stifled by 21st century narratives.
I'm personally not a British person. Yet, I can't help but feel insulted on behalf of the real historical people of the time period in England.
When I watch a "historical drama", as a viewer with an interest in history, I want immersion. It's a sad indictment of modern society when historical TV productions feel obligated to be all inclusive in the name of progressive politics.
The story itself is very intriguing, but the show as a whole feels disingenuous and far removed from the time period. There are dual narratives at play. One is set in the 16th century and the other is set firmly in the 21st and it's difficult to separate one from the other.
If you don't require immersion you'll probably enjoy the series. However, I personally find it difficult to suspend belief enough to envision that so many people in 16th England were of Asian and sub-Saharan African descent.
This is just an honest opinion of someone who has no political agenda or biases whatsoever. I like historical dramas. Unfortunately, this historical/fantasy hybrid is not something I can invest in.
I'm personally not a British person. Yet, I can't help but feel insulted on behalf of the real historical people of the time period in England.
When I watch a "historical drama", as a viewer with an interest in history, I want immersion. It's a sad indictment of modern society when historical TV productions feel obligated to be all inclusive in the name of progressive politics.
The story itself is very intriguing, but the show as a whole feels disingenuous and far removed from the time period. There are dual narratives at play. One is set in the 16th century and the other is set firmly in the 21st and it's difficult to separate one from the other.
If you don't require immersion you'll probably enjoy the series. However, I personally find it difficult to suspend belief enough to envision that so many people in 16th England were of Asian and sub-Saharan African descent.
This is just an honest opinion of someone who has no political agenda or biases whatsoever. I like historical dramas. Unfortunately, this historical/fantasy hybrid is not something I can invest in.
Shardlake is about a murder mystery in 16th century England during Henry VIIIs dismantling of the monasteries, and as a History teacher of course I had to watch this. I was a bit concerned that it would overlap The Tudors too much but luckily this is not the case and this series and its mystery stands on its own two feet very well.
Sean Bean is given ridiculously little screen time and at first it got me irritated and I thought this was another one of those series where you hire a famous actor for 5 minutes and live of their reputation, but this is not the case and my mood improved as I got stuck into the mystery.
I was happy to see Anthony Boyle again after just seeing his star-making performances in Masters of the Air and Manhunt, but I believe that co-starring roles like this are now a thing of the past for him. His performance is pretty good as John Barak, but the true star of the show is Arthur Hughes as Shardlake. He is the star of every scene he is in, and in Holmes-like faction he solves the mystery one step at a time while remaining confident and charismatic in a way that captivates the viewer. A revelation indeed, this works really well, excellent casting.
All in all, even though this is nowhere near as good as "The Name of the Rose" for example, the settings look great, the tone is grim, the mystery is fairly interesting and the acting is better than I expected. Well worth a watch!
Sean Bean is given ridiculously little screen time and at first it got me irritated and I thought this was another one of those series where you hire a famous actor for 5 minutes and live of their reputation, but this is not the case and my mood improved as I got stuck into the mystery.
I was happy to see Anthony Boyle again after just seeing his star-making performances in Masters of the Air and Manhunt, but I believe that co-starring roles like this are now a thing of the past for him. His performance is pretty good as John Barak, but the true star of the show is Arthur Hughes as Shardlake. He is the star of every scene he is in, and in Holmes-like faction he solves the mystery one step at a time while remaining confident and charismatic in a way that captivates the viewer. A revelation indeed, this works really well, excellent casting.
All in all, even though this is nowhere near as good as "The Name of the Rose" for example, the settings look great, the tone is grim, the mystery is fairly interesting and the acting is better than I expected. Well worth a watch!
Shardlake offers up an intriguing plot with an excellent cast, it can at times lack a captivating spark to reach the next level. However, provides enough interest to keep you engaged to the end. I feel this is more an intro into the characters and expect more layers to unfold should more series be green lit. Certainly provides the opportunity for different stories to be told.
Sean Bean lacked much character development and was massively underutilised. Whilst Arthur Hughes was very impressive and kept me interested throughout.
Overall certainly worth a watch and with time I expect the show to improve with more series.
Sean Bean lacked much character development and was massively underutilised. Whilst Arthur Hughes was very impressive and kept me interested throughout.
Overall certainly worth a watch and with time I expect the show to improve with more series.
I'd forgotten the plot of the original Dissolution novel on which this is based hence the whodunnit element was enough to keep me watching the whole series. I see some reviewers are critical of casting choices which I can't truly see any issue with - it's a dramatisation, faithfulness to the period in terms of exact settings, clothing, architecture etc don't need to be adhered to, as after all, in the time of its setting the language spoken itself would've been impossible to recreate faithfully to modern viewers understanding! I'm interested to see if further adaptations will continue as I do love the genre of medieval murder mysteries and TV lacks these! But the main characters were well developed and cast, and I'm amused at the irony of Sean Bean playing Cromwell who, we all know, irl did not meet a happy and peaceful ending, much like many of the characters Sean plays...
I thought it impossible for TV to capture the essence of C. J. Sansom's Shardlake book series. I am happily surprised by the spirit and quality of the TV series so far. The casting, especially Arthur Hughes and Anthony Boyle (the man is currently in 3 series I am watching!) is near perfect based on the books. Episode 4 is a bit muddled when it comes to tieing up all the loose ends (Norfolk and his man) but still consider the series off to a good start. And for those who have criticized the "the historical accuracy" of people of color in Tudor England, I refer you both to the novels and to the British Library. Africans had important roles in Tudor times, including in religious communities. It wasn't until later they were relegated to lower status due to the slave trade.
Did you know
- TriviaThe original novels by C.J. Sansom were considered as a project by Kenneth Branagh, who chose to do Les enquêtes de l'inspecteur Wallander (2008) as it did not involve period costume or acting as someone with curvature of the spine.
- GoofsHis earring changes from his left to his right ear in one scene.
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Matthew Shardlake
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 54m
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 HD
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content