After a house robbery fail, a group of thieves decide to try again in a house with a grieving family, but something sinister lurks in the darkness.After a house robbery fail, a group of thieves decide to try again in a house with a grieving family, but something sinister lurks in the darkness.After a house robbery fail, a group of thieves decide to try again in a house with a grieving family, but something sinister lurks in the darkness.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
My favorite work from Anglin, and it features my favorite characters he has written. The acting, the sound design, the cinematography, the score, the editing, and most of all the writing all shine in this production, and I enjoyed every second of it. The film builds towards an exciting climax that feels not only satisfying but as dark and messed up as the story suggests. That being said, the film blends horror with comedy so well, and I truly think this is the best writing I have seen from Anglin. His characters feel so fleshed out, and Gramps specifically feels like such a fully realized character. His monologue on the porch had me leaning back in horror and leaning in to hear more.
Additionally, I mentioned the editing earlier, and I just want to say again that I was never bored. The story is paced so well, and both sets of characters (the grieving family and the moonlight marauders) were so interesting that the story did not feel stilted when the story switched back and forth from one group to the other. Also, the editing at the climax of the film is excellent. And yeah, I mentioned it earlier too, but man did I enjoy the musical score. It felt both fitting and it carried suspense from scene to scene. Music should always complement a scene, and Álvaro Rodríguez Cabezas does just that.
In short, "Pesadilla" signals a bright future for Anglin, and it simultaneously inspires other filmmakers in Kentucky like me. Solid 8/10 for me, and I 10/10 recommend it. Shout out Mike Davis and Alexis Ward!
Additionally, I mentioned the editing earlier, and I just want to say again that I was never bored. The story is paced so well, and both sets of characters (the grieving family and the moonlight marauders) were so interesting that the story did not feel stilted when the story switched back and forth from one group to the other. Also, the editing at the climax of the film is excellent. And yeah, I mentioned it earlier too, but man did I enjoy the musical score. It felt both fitting and it carried suspense from scene to scene. Music should always complement a scene, and Álvaro Rodríguez Cabezas does just that.
In short, "Pesadilla" signals a bright future for Anglin, and it simultaneously inspires other filmmakers in Kentucky like me. Solid 8/10 for me, and I 10/10 recommend it. Shout out Mike Davis and Alexis Ward!
Tbh, most micro budget films are something along the lines of crime or chasing someone around with a knife. I couldn't help but get the same feeling as something like Primer, or Following. I mean this film makes a convincing (yet terrifying) point in regards to the Andy Griffith show which is something you don't see often on this scale, the "outrageous metaphors". Shocking moments, tough subject matter, a final 5 minutes that are admittedly more iconic than the actual film and iconic in itself. The grandpa character was extremely well written, and the performance was superb. I liked this film, it was different.
I didn't know what to expect when starting this film. I love a story that hooks you straight from the start, and this one does.
Early on, I thought I knew where it was going, but there were several twists and turns I didn't expect. Great performances from the entire cast with compelling dialogue and stories that worked well on their own in addition to weaving together seamlessly to convene for the finale.
And the finale-this film had me on the edge of my seat until the very end. I yelled and screamed at the TV in shock, and I'm thoroughly impressed with what I experienced and look forward to seeing it again.
Early on, I thought I knew where it was going, but there were several twists and turns I didn't expect. Great performances from the entire cast with compelling dialogue and stories that worked well on their own in addition to weaving together seamlessly to convene for the finale.
And the finale-this film had me on the edge of my seat until the very end. I yelled and screamed at the TV in shock, and I'm thoroughly impressed with what I experienced and look forward to seeing it again.
There really isn't another film like PESADILLA. Bizarre and unpredictable, and the characters are outlandish and fun. Dylan Anglin's made some other short films and they all have twists and turns and are funky. Kapadia's character is particularly weird and off-kilter. What's amazing is how a film like this can be brought o life on such a minimal budget. This would've been very difficult even 20 years ago. It's nice the film is available on several platforms, as more films like this should be given attention. So, if you're ready to step away from the usual Hollywood pap and slow-burn blah blah, jump in. Highly recommended!
It has been a while since I've professionally reviewed anything, but I'd like to give it another go, especially with films that might have flown under the radar. This day and age, I find myself watching a lot of indie films, A lot of the times on Tubi, and this time on Amazon and figured I'd give it a watch (The two cows on the poster sold it). When I first watched Pesadilla, I wasn't sure how I felt about it. Sure, it had some issues.. the soundtrack mixing was a little off, though, to be fair, I have that complaint with a lot of Hollywood films as well. I can't imagine the director thought that everybody would go for this film, so I initially wrote it off as something that just wasn't for me. But then I sat on it. I went to bed, and my mind kept going back to the last five minutes. And I have to give credit where it's due when this film commits to an idea, it really goes for it. That's both its biggest flaw and its most encouraging trait. It's too ambitious for what it's trying to be, but honestly, that's exactly why I ended up liking it.
Most micro-budget short films tend to go the slasher route or suffer from poorly written dialogue, but Pesadilla defies those expectations. The dialogue outside, in particular the conversation with Gramps, played by Mike Davis (who was phenomenal, by the way) felt chilling and haunting in a way I've rarely seen in micro-budget films. There was one moment where a creature's hand jumped into frame, and I initially thought it was the cheesiest part of the whole thing. But then I realized, it worked. It made me jump, and that's when it clicked for me: this film is the work of someone who truly loves the medium. Someone who wants to create something great but is restricted by budget and resources. And in this day and age, that's a challenge filmmakers have to push through. And let's talk about the creature, I did not find it scary but if you look at it as a metaphorical presence, it works a lot better then it just being something in a house stalking people.
I'd be fibbing if I said I wasn't interested in revisiting Pesadilla. Maybe I'll like it less on a rewatch, or maybe I'll appreciate it even more. Some of the key takeaways, some performances were definitely stronger than others, it's not a make or break, but I really think casting is a huge deal, especially when you're working bare bones and there's nothing you can do. I'm torn on the overall direction because one part of me wants to say "Hey tone it back" And another part wants me to say "what's going on in this singular mind?". But one thing's for sure nearly two hours long, and there's something happening in every scene. Yes people will view this as an amateurish film, but it's one of the better and ballsy "amateurish films"I've seen.
Most micro-budget short films tend to go the slasher route or suffer from poorly written dialogue, but Pesadilla defies those expectations. The dialogue outside, in particular the conversation with Gramps, played by Mike Davis (who was phenomenal, by the way) felt chilling and haunting in a way I've rarely seen in micro-budget films. There was one moment where a creature's hand jumped into frame, and I initially thought it was the cheesiest part of the whole thing. But then I realized, it worked. It made me jump, and that's when it clicked for me: this film is the work of someone who truly loves the medium. Someone who wants to create something great but is restricted by budget and resources. And in this day and age, that's a challenge filmmakers have to push through. And let's talk about the creature, I did not find it scary but if you look at it as a metaphorical presence, it works a lot better then it just being something in a house stalking people.
I'd be fibbing if I said I wasn't interested in revisiting Pesadilla. Maybe I'll like it less on a rewatch, or maybe I'll appreciate it even more. Some of the key takeaways, some performances were definitely stronger than others, it's not a make or break, but I really think casting is a huge deal, especially when you're working bare bones and there's nothing you can do. I'm torn on the overall direction because one part of me wants to say "Hey tone it back" And another part wants me to say "what's going on in this singular mind?". But one thing's for sure nearly two hours long, and there's something happening in every scene. Yes people will view this as an amateurish film, but it's one of the better and ballsy "amateurish films"I've seen.
- How long is Pesadilla?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $20,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 52 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content