Please Don't Feed the Children

I am known for my very long reviews. This won't be one of them. Ms. Spielberg, what on earth were you thinking? I don't even know what to say. The synopsis sounded derivative but interesting. The trailer made me curious- but then, this movie?

The plot barely matters because there almost is none. There is exposition in the first 5 minutes including the films title. It serves no purpose- it becomes an afterthought- gives you a hint of a possible story that never materializes. It then gives you unlikeable characters you have no reason to care about, and after seeing cliche after cliche of typical thriller tropes well- the question becomes- why didn't i turn it off?

I didn't because it was Steven Spielberg's daughter's first film and i was hoping it would eventually become more interesting. What's shocking is it actually got worse -- and there was no great metaphor that people "needed to understand" or "didn't get". This is not a deep film. It could have been adults who ended up at the house for the purpose we later discover. There was no twist at the end, only a boring obvious common sense reveal. Oh by the way lady- where is your husband again?

The reason given in the first 5 minutes was not based on jealousy/fear but an excuse for a scapegoat. Kids don't outlive the adults. The adults have lived years longer already- and nobody was scared of anyone in this film unless they had a gun pointed at their face. In fact, those 5 minutes of exposition seemed like a setup for another movie entirely. Those looking for meaning or metaphors when there was none are just foolish. This film failed on every level.

Please- for your next film, pick up a decent script and a story that's interesting and that justifies becoming a full length movie. Thank you.

1. Stupid plot - Check 2. Bad acting - Check 3. Terrible writing - Check 4. Dumb characters - Check

I watched this flaming pile of dung until the end just to see how bad it could get - it didn't disappoint. Each minute was worst than the preceding minute. It was that bad. How anybody convinced a "studio" to finance this disaster is beyond me.

1. The plot is a mishmash of various horror films rolled into one - just done much worse than any of the originals.

2. The acting is worse than a Hallmark family movie. I'm surprised that the editors let any of this mess out of the cutting room.

3. Not much to say about the writing - banal, brainless, regurgitated crapola.

4. The decisions made by the characters made no sense given the setting in which they were supposed to be living. The thought "Why didn't he/she just do X?" passed though my head at least once in every scene.

This movie sounds good on paper but none of it makes it off the page.

The movie starts off with a voice over, not a good sign but not itself a dealer break. But it quickly becomes clear there will be no attempt to establish the world visually. Those couple of sentences are the beginning and end of the world building.

From there the script is a series of cringy lines. The choices of the characters is nonsense. Some of which might work if the majority of the actors were actually children instead of young adults.

Rather than explore the concept we get another tired execution of a nutty woman who kidnaps wayward children. There is no depth even here. No exploration of how else she find victims. No acknowledgment of her british accent and speech style. The audio attempts to tell convince us these scenes are foreboding but it never aligns with what we see on screen.

There is a dissonance here but not the kind that builds upon itself.

There is nothing here but hints of something that could have been. Very subtle hints.

Cool premise, really liked the idea and the first half kept my interest for sure. But after that it's just dumb character decision after dumb character decision. The acting is okay too but the writing is so bad in the second half that I almost just turned it off.

It's things like when you're getting attacked or held by gun and don't take the gun or subdue the attacker that really make the last 1/3 unwatchable. I was yelling at the TV multiple times because the kid characters are so insufferable and stupid.

It does have some good acting, the premise is cool and some SFX were good too, but the bad writing ruins the whole thing towards the end. 4.2/10.

First, being the daughter of a great (mostly) director, doesn't mean the progeny will be a great director. Hence this. Does no one who writes a movie, think beyond the premise? This move comes straight from the weak as hell J. J. Abrams/Alex Kurtzman school of film writing. The premise, a disease that kills adults and affects children, well, let's be honest. The Virus of the week film isn't anything new. How it's done, like lets say the 28 series (NOT ZOMBIE MOVIES!) are brilliant, each evolving in a different way. Now, if this virus is so virulent, how has anyone survived it? (First mistake). The movie doesn't know what it wants to be; is it horror? Suspense? Where are the monsters? How did Michelle Dockery (who looks and acts like an older version of her character from Downton Abbey, and constantly uses the english term 'Sweets' for candy.) Ditto Giancarlo Esposito. This is just a bad, weak movie that runs on the coattails of the director's name. Weak and poor. I can see why it premiered on Tubi.