As her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.As her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.As her 30th birthday looms, an over-achieving woman with a thing for bowlers decides to marry the man of her dreams in just under a month.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This a great example of a film where everyone working to make tried so very hard to make it that they forgot to keep track of the pages of the script resulting in 1) Enormous plot holes, 2) opened story elements that are never closed or developed, and 3) cappers on story elements that never reached the final cut.
I will just address one fantastically annoying element in the story. In the first 5-7 minutes of one of the key characters of the film, and I will pause there to say it is a KEY character to the resolution of the film, the audience learns that this character had entered a wager wherein he can only speak in movie quotes. I was initially intrigued by this gambit and hoped to enjoy a crafty usage of movie quotes, this character works in a video rental store, a seeming reference to Q. Tarantino. So what happens? If you have read this far into the review you have already read more words than the character, a key character says during the wager period. That's right, a Key character rendered mute for 90% of the film.
Watch this only if you enjoy keeping a mental checklist of how you, as casual film viewer, could easily fix all of the drastically obvious problems of this film. Or simply watch this film so that in the future you can appreciative by constrast how good films are good without drawing attention to themselves doing those simple things that make them good. In that respect film students could use it to demonstrate how they have learned story and character development.
My best example would be how it feels after attending a music recital performed by amateurs who had only spent the last twenty-four hours composing their performance, with the almost unnoticed, effortless, music playing in the elevator on the way to your car.
Its a mess don't watch if you are someone who has to know how a movie ends, few will ever make it to the end of this movie.
I will just address one fantastically annoying element in the story. In the first 5-7 minutes of one of the key characters of the film, and I will pause there to say it is a KEY character to the resolution of the film, the audience learns that this character had entered a wager wherein he can only speak in movie quotes. I was initially intrigued by this gambit and hoped to enjoy a crafty usage of movie quotes, this character works in a video rental store, a seeming reference to Q. Tarantino. So what happens? If you have read this far into the review you have already read more words than the character, a key character says during the wager period. That's right, a Key character rendered mute for 90% of the film.
Watch this only if you enjoy keeping a mental checklist of how you, as casual film viewer, could easily fix all of the drastically obvious problems of this film. Or simply watch this film so that in the future you can appreciative by constrast how good films are good without drawing attention to themselves doing those simple things that make them good. In that respect film students could use it to demonstrate how they have learned story and character development.
My best example would be how it feels after attending a music recital performed by amateurs who had only spent the last twenty-four hours composing their performance, with the almost unnoticed, effortless, music playing in the elevator on the way to your car.
Its a mess don't watch if you are someone who has to know how a movie ends, few will ever make it to the end of this movie.
I hate how people are leaving negative reviews because they made the mistake to watch the wrong movie. Its already hard enough for them making a movie with a budget not as big as the Split film some where expecting. This is more of a comedy film than a thriller film. The best of luck to this films producer and actors/actresses. Watch this film if you expect comedy not suspense.
Like many others I thought I was the movie Split as part the unbreakable, split trilogy but after 10 mins I guessed it wasn't gonna be "that" movie.... But I have a thing for watching a random films and watched it to the end and enjoyed it.... Worth a watch for sure especially if you enjoy watching humans being humans
I agree with the other two reviews here - its a good film and worth way more than the 3.3 rating. Making low budget films in this genre is the hardest thing. You never know if light comedy scenes are really going to work until they're cut together. This film is so close to being great and given a better budget and a couple more rewrites I'm sure it would have been. Towards the end it seems rushed and I bet they would have re-shot a couple of scenes had they had the money. Having said that the acting is superb and its really well shot and framed. The sound mix is not great but I imagine that's just the money for a really good dub that was lacking. All in all I liked it and would love to see these actors in more stuff.
Not worth the 3.7 it currently has on IMDb. it's warm and endearing, it's pretty by the numbers and cookie, at times. But an enjoyable watch for me. Just don't think you're watching anything other than this type of movie and you'll enjoy it. I guess its low rating is down to people not being able to adapt to what type of film they are watching to what type of movie they went out to see.
Did you know
- TriviaOne of three movies to be released in 2016 to be titled Split.
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 30m(90 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content