Ballard

As a longtime Maggie Q fan, I've always felt she hasn't been given nearly enough roles that showcase her full range. Outside of Nikita and the criminally short-lived Stalker, we rarely got to see her dig deep into a role that matched her capabilities. Ballard changes that-and then some.

As Detective Renée Ballard, Maggie Q doesn't just lead the show-she owns it. Her performance is a compelling mix of grit, intelligence, empathy, and quiet resilience. It's the kind of nuanced, powerful work that reminds you just how underutilized she's been until now. This is the role she's long deserved, and she meets it with both power and grace.

Centered around a team of volunteer detectives working the LAPD's Open-Unsolved Unit, Ballard focuses on cold cases-those emotionally charged, high-stakes investigations that don't always come with easy answers. The fact that they're digging into the past makes every win harder-earned and every clue more precious. It raises the emotional stakes and the degree of difficulty.

The storytelling is tight and layered, often weaving together multiple cases per episode. This approach mirrors the chaotic, overlapping nature of real police work and adds to the show's authentic feel. The pacing stays sharp, the stakes stay high, and the suspense rarely lets up.

The ensemble cast is another strength. Each team member brings depth, personality, and a bit of emotional baggage, creating a group dynamic that feels lived-in and real. Their chemistry is effortless; their interactions laced with humor, friction, and genuine camaraderie. You don't just root for them-you care about them.

One particularly thoughtful detail is the inclusion of Ballard's former partner: a retired, gay officer who's happily partnered. His presence is handled with subtlety and respect-never feeling like tokenism, just honest, well-executed representation. It's one of many small touches that reflect the show's integrity.

If you're a fan of The Closer, Ballard will feel like coming home-with fresh energy and a sharper edge. I binged the entire season in one sitting and ended up hungry for more. A lot more. Like Bosch, this show has the foundation to go the distance-and it deserves to.

So, pour a glass of wine, round up your fellow crime procedural junkies, and dive into Ballard. It's smart, gripping, grounded television with real staying power. And once you're hooked (and you will be), join me in manifesting not just a second season-but a long-running Ballard legacy.

Update: After binging the entire season and letting the afterglow settle for a few days, one detail still lingers in my mind: I wish the show had offered a clearer explanation behind the killer's first victim. That particular murder didn't quite match the pattern he developed later-and considering she wasn't alone and he had to kill someone else just to get to her, it feels like a key moment that begged for more context. Like, did he just need a cover for his storage unit? A murder of opportunity that unleashed his inner demons and turned into a series of murders? Exploring that could've provided insight into what actually triggered his descent into serial killing.

To be fair, every other case wrapped up cleanly (cliffhanger aside!), which makes this feel like a missed opportunity rather than a flaw. It doesn't take away from how much I loved the show-at this point, I'm just nitpicking. Still, here's hoping the writers take note for future seasons.

I am a huge fan of all the novels of Michael Connelly!!!

In the book "Desert Star" Ballard and Bosch work TOGETHER to solve two main cold cases: the Gallagher family massacre and the murder of Sarah Pearlman. I was so thrilled because I wanted to see them BOTH hunting the killer... Unfortunately in "Ballard" TV series Harry Bosch just apears for a while in some episodes...

"Ballard" TV series lack the emotional depth and complexity of the novels of Michael Connelly...

I miss in "Ballard" the strong visual presence of Los Angeles, that in "Bosch" it was a significant part of its appeal and contributed to its emotional impact...

In the "Ballard" TV series, the character of Ted Rawls is significantly different from his portrayal in the Michael Connelly novels...

Those who haven't read the book may find the series more enjoyable because they lack the pre-conceived expectations and comparisons that readers often bring to adaptations.

I have been waiting for this show to arrive. Almost 2 hours after it's release I went to look up a few cast members, and I see 3 reviews, horribly rated. How did you watch 8 hours of show already? I chalk this up to two things. Misogynists or Bosch lovers who can't let go.

I only know Maggie Q from a failed, very decent sitcom...and Bosch.

Elevator Pitch: It's like "The Sandlot" meets "The Shield" with goodness.

Almost every episode, there is a 'sort' of win, for this rag tag team. Some story lines seem too quick and too wrapped up, but over all, this is quite entertaining. So much better than 3/4 of the American made tripe. Maggie Q is wonderful. The whole, "rag tag" team are fantastic. The "tussles" are great as are the police car barricade scenes. So worth it, Don't pay attention to nay sayers.

In some instances, the dialogue is entertaining, with clever quips and moments of wit that land well. However, there are times when it feels like the script is so poorly written that not even the most seasoned actors can salvage it. Some scenes are cringeworthy, and it's clear that the dialogue doesn't serve the characters or the plot effectively. That being said, the cast does their best, and in certain moments, they manage to elevate the material despite the weak lines.

The standout performance, without a doubt, is Maggie. Her presence on screen is undeniable, and she really helps anchor the show, pulling the cast together. Her character feels grounded and compelling, and it's clear that her portrayal has more depth than the script may give her credit for. She certainly brings a sense of heart and authenticity to a show that occasionally struggles to find its footing.

Despite the questionable dialogue, the premise itself is strong, offering a fresh take on the crime genre. The storyline keeps you intrigued, and there's a solid foundation for the show to grow. The pacing and character development, while a bit uneven at times, are ultimately enough to keep you invested in the long run.

Ultimately, despite the script's flaws, the show has potential. It will probably become my new crime series, mostly thanks to the compelling premise and Maggie's stellar performance. With a bit more polish in the writing department, this could easily evolve into one of the top shows in the genre.

As a devoted Connelly fan, I was eagerly anticipating this series. However, after watching three episodes, I find myself rather disappointed. I struggled to connect with the characters and the storyline, which felt disconnected from the world of the novels.

In particular, Ballard's portrayal jarred with the version I've come to know and admire-an independent, gritty protagonist who lives out of her car and has no ties to family. That rawness was part of her appeal, and unfortunately, the writers have chosen to take her character in a far more conventional and uninspired direction.

I realise this might go against popular opinion, but despite Maggie Q's beauty and competence, she doesn't quite convince in the role. She lacks the commanding presence needed to carry the series as its central figure.

Overall, the show feels superficial, with obvious political messaging that detracts from the story rather than enhancing it. It's not terrible-but it's certainly not compelling enough for me to binge.