Persuasive viewpoints of over 1,700 architects and engineers who believe the unsettling theory that scientific forensic evidence points to explosive controlled demolition of the three World ... Read allPersuasive viewpoints of over 1,700 architects and engineers who believe the unsettling theory that scientific forensic evidence points to explosive controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001.Persuasive viewpoints of over 1,700 architects and engineers who believe the unsettling theory that scientific forensic evidence points to explosive controlled demolition of the three World Trade Center skyscrapers on September 11, 2001.
- Self - Scientist
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Before you spend any time watching another fictional Hollywood film, watch this Experts Speak Out documentary about the scientific evidence behind an event which is changing the way of life in America, from the TSA scanning and patting down our bodies at airports to our basic rights like Habeus Corpus and privacy.
This film will help open your eyes to a terrible lie.
A&E fort 9/11 Truth bring forth what actually happened, with plenty of solid, irrefutable evidence that the attacks of 9/11 were completely outside of the scope and capabilities of the alleged, nineteen Saudi's in question.
Actually, go to youtube and watch WTC7 collapse, straight down, at near free fall speed, appearing to literally melt into it's base, as though held in place by a form or mold, around the massive skyscraper! We've been told that this incredible sight was accomplished by, "burning debris" on one side of the building. Suuuure, it was!;) Not.
Also, anyone who doesn't already know about William Rodriquez, watch his testimony on youtube. He knew those buildings inside and out and against orders of firemen, repeatedly ran into one of the buildings, pulling people out, over and over again, at great peril to himself. Anybody think Cheney or the rest of the Bush gang would have done that, in the same situation?
Me, neither.
He persisted in pressuring the completely reluctant Bush Administration to hold the 9/11 Commission, which was limited in scope, politically compromised and poorly funded. The one who's chairs state publicly that they were lied to repeatedly, by the Cheney/Bush Administration, the Pentagon, the FBI and the CIA. Lied to, repeatedly about 9/11. He also was in one of the buildings, in an elevator with others and confirms what firemen and others there have stated. There were explosions taking place in the basement of that building, moments before planes hit.
Everyone who cares about their country should see this. At least, people who value their freedom and value the ideal of honest government.
There is an article from the New York Times entitled something like, "Forgotten Voices of 9/11". It reports that the firemen were radioing to the ground, as they climbed the stairs and reached the crash site in one of the buildings, found survivors at the crash site in the building and were calling down for support to help bring the survivors at the crash site in the building where we have been told, over and over again, that there was a giant, superheated inferno, capable of weakening massive steel beams. Survivors would not be found in such an environment and they wouldn't have been able to get to the crash site, if there was. They reported NO raging inferno, obviously. Moments later, the tower disintegrated around them.
We owe it to them, the multitudes that have perished in the wars based on lies and deception in it's name, to look into the unbelievable events that happened that day. Then, investigate and bring the people who did carry it out to justice.
Just watch it, already!
The video segments of the Twin Towers being destroyed show ejected material falling outside the building (i.e. nothing holding it up) is convincing. This material is falling at the same rate as the floor-by-floor destruction of the building. This can't be a gravity collapse because the material on the outside would be falling much faster.
An excellent documentary!
Not only does the film go in depth into the many scientific flaws surrounding the official 9/11 account -- especially regarding the collapse of WTC building 7 -- it also features top psychologists and therapists who explain why this chilling information is so difficult for some people to accept. That gives this documentary immense value to those who are becoming aware of the issue for the first time, as well as those who desire to educate others on this subject.
Unfortunately this movie did not use much good evidence in its analysis. It seems to have started from conclusions and worked backwards. Most all the arguments made for how we were misled about the cause of collapse did not ring true to me as a building professional.
Ultimately, I was so disappointed in the quality of the analysis that I researched the experts in the film. I could find no credentials that make anyone quoted in the film particularly credible. My view is that this film is actually MORE inaccurate than anything the main stream media has said about the WTC collapse.
Did you know
- TriviaPremiered in the United States on Colorado Public Television, airing as a successful primetime pledge event in August 2012, and subsequently became the most-viewed and most-discussed video on the PBS.org website during the following weeks.
- Quotes
Leslie Young (Architect): When I watched building 7 collapse, it left basically no doubt in my mind. Building 7 had not been hit by a plane. To me it was obvious that there was some controlled demolition and some explosives involved.
- ConnectionsEdited into The Demolition of Truth-Psychologists Examine 9/11 (2016)
- How long is 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Preuves d'explosifs le 11 septembre: les Experts se prononcent
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro