Caretakers

The movie was pretty okay - just the ending was a complete and total bummer I wish it was written differently - it builds you up with lots of hopes just for your hopes to be let down for the characters.

One of the slowest, worst movies I've ever seen. The acting by most of the so-called actors is awful, especially that of the "star", George Loomis. Christopher Cousins is OK, and a couple of the others are OK, but the majority are simply awful, with unrealistic situations and a totally unbelievable script. Don't waste your time on this film.

Enjoyed watching UNTHINKABLE and loved the storyline. The DP should have been replaced. Why didn't Talbot pull focus? All of the shots were so blurry!! Loomis is one to watch tho.

The only element mildly compelling about this film is the 3 attractive nurses, hence the above 1 out of 10 rating.

Is the person hiring the cast being paid? Are the actors paid? Surely they've paid the person hiring? If not then the world has gone mad.

Whoever rated this film 3 or above should have their rating allowances revoked, along with their reproductive organs.

Ok.. I didn't know where this film was going but I was interested to see. Sure enough, it really delivered and where it went took me by surprise. The acting was good and no one gave too much away. Usually I can guess who villains are or who is going to do what in movies like this, but I was usually wrong watching this. That was fun.

Even though I was into it the whole time, I wanted more action sequences. That would have rounded it out more but it still really took me by surprise which I appreciate because that's rare. Giving a higher score as I don't think they had the budget to add more attack scenes/action. Good fun movie.