Which ever one wins. We lose.Which ever one wins. We lose.Which ever one wins. We lose.
Photos
Joseph Michael Harris
- Gunnery Sgt. Benjamin Wright
- (as Michael Harris)
Brandy LaPlante
- Michelle Barons
- (as Brandy Laplante)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
There are no words to describe!! There is only twitching and eyes bulging in disbelief!! All that remains is the hope that whoever was responsible for this horror died in the explosive finale.
Honestly, I try to give films a chance and an open mind. I'm really not picky and have a great collection of cheesy TV disaster movies.
But when I go to watch a disaster movie, it's because I assume the disaster happens in the film, not the the film itself is the disaster. It really is that bad! I gave this 1 star because A: some of the actors did make quite a good effort in places, and B: I can't give it zero stars, so I had to find something to justify one star.
The 2nd star is for how real some of the stuff looked. Specifically, the boobs. Oh, and a fair few pretty ladies that they belonged to. Probably the only thing that I could entice people with to watch this to the end.
If you don't like pretty girls, (some with glasses, great!), or boobs, you have absolutely no reason to watch this. In fact, if you bought this, or just watched it by accident, or were forced to watch it, I would see if there is a clause in your life insurance that allows you to claim for the hour and a half of your life that you will never get back.
But when I go to watch a disaster movie, it's because I assume the disaster happens in the film, not the the film itself is the disaster. It really is that bad! I gave this 1 star because A: some of the actors did make quite a good effort in places, and B: I can't give it zero stars, so I had to find something to justify one star.
The 2nd star is for how real some of the stuff looked. Specifically, the boobs. Oh, and a fair few pretty ladies that they belonged to. Probably the only thing that I could entice people with to watch this to the end.
If you don't like pretty girls, (some with glasses, great!), or boobs, you have absolutely no reason to watch this. In fact, if you bought this, or just watched it by accident, or were forced to watch it, I would see if there is a clause in your life insurance that allows you to claim for the hour and a half of your life that you will never get back.
Now in my top 20 worse movies ever made. The only person I recognized was the lady who played the Vice-President. She played the President in "24". Hard to believe. Was she that hard up for work?
If you do start to watch this terrible movie, you'll probably find yourself skipping ahead until you actually see something happening. Special effects looked like it was done by a few 12 years old. Avoid headaches by skipping this disaster.
A bit puzzled how this got even 3 stars. People could give all the spoilers they could and this still would not upset many people. Is the man in the bathrobe the hero? You won't care one bit.
If you do start to watch this terrible movie, you'll probably find yourself skipping ahead until you actually see something happening. Special effects looked like it was done by a few 12 years old. Avoid headaches by skipping this disaster.
A bit puzzled how this got even 3 stars. People could give all the spoilers they could and this still would not upset many people. Is the man in the bathrobe the hero? You won't care one bit.
This has to be one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It does something which I thought was impossible, which was to make the Asylum movies look good.
The story is bad. The plot holes are so big you could probably lose a planet in them. Maybe even a solar system.
The actors all look and sound bored. As far as I can see, none of them seem to be even making any effort to act. Much of the stuff they do doesn't seem to make sense, even in the context of the movie.
The sound is bad - most of it sounds like it was recorded in a bathroom.
The special effects are really... special. Flying debris is represented by random black dots superimposed over the image, not connected to anything. And those are some of the better special effects. The final scene is so badly done it has to be seen to be believed.
Several of the scenes are just totally unrelated stock footage that was spliced in, and in many cases are so jarringly out of place that I had to rewind just to make sure I had actually seen what I though I had seen.
I understand that this was done with a low budget, but man, even with a low budget, they could at least have made an effort. The impression I get from this movie is that nobody cared enough to even try. Watch at your own peril.
The story is bad. The plot holes are so big you could probably lose a planet in them. Maybe even a solar system.
The actors all look and sound bored. As far as I can see, none of them seem to be even making any effort to act. Much of the stuff they do doesn't seem to make sense, even in the context of the movie.
The sound is bad - most of it sounds like it was recorded in a bathroom.
The special effects are really... special. Flying debris is represented by random black dots superimposed over the image, not connected to anything. And those are some of the better special effects. The final scene is so badly done it has to be seen to be believed.
Several of the scenes are just totally unrelated stock footage that was spliced in, and in many cases are so jarringly out of place that I had to rewind just to make sure I had actually seen what I though I had seen.
I understand that this was done with a low budget, but man, even with a low budget, they could at least have made an effort. The impression I get from this movie is that nobody cared enough to even try. Watch at your own peril.
and I don't mean in a good way. Nothing has really happened 40 minutes into the movie. The CGI is so laughable.
If the movie was supposed to be about Los Angeles, then perhaps they should not show CBC Radio Vancouver on the building. They did have California license plates though.
If the buildings are supposed to be failing apart, the parts that fall off should be missing from the building.
How that one woman got out of the car when there were power lines on her car? How did that happen?
The visuals of the tsunami were used over and over again.
There is talk of wide spread damage but yet driving looks awesome.
The acting was horrible. I watched it to see how bad it could get. Definitely on the bottom 100 of any movie every made.
If the movie was supposed to be about Los Angeles, then perhaps they should not show CBC Radio Vancouver on the building. They did have California license plates though.
If the buildings are supposed to be failing apart, the parts that fall off should be missing from the building.
How that one woman got out of the car when there were power lines on her car? How did that happen?
The visuals of the tsunami were used over and over again.
There is talk of wide spread damage but yet driving looks awesome.
The acting was horrible. I watched it to see how bad it could get. Definitely on the bottom 100 of any movie every made.
Did you know
- ConnectionsFeatures Solitaire (1981)
- How long is Disaster Wars: Earthquake vs. Tsunami?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Stormageddon: Earthquake vs Tsunami
- Filming locations
- Los Angeles, California, USA(main location)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $185,000 (estimated)
- Runtime1 hour 25 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Disaster Wars: Earthquake vs. Tsunami (2013) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer