[go: up one dir, main page]

    Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro

Tornades de pierres

Original title: Stonados
  • TV Movie
  • 2013
  • 10
  • 1h 28m
IMDb RATING
3.0/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
Tornades de pierres (2013)
ActionAdventureDramaSci-FiThriller

When a tornado appears in the waters south of Boston, former storm chaser Joe Randall is intrigued by the unusual weather. But as twisters begin to strike across the Boston shoreline, Joe qu... Read allWhen a tornado appears in the waters south of Boston, former storm chaser Joe Randall is intrigued by the unusual weather. But as twisters begin to strike across the Boston shoreline, Joe quickly realizes this is no ordinary storm front. As the storms threaten to move inland, the... Read allWhen a tornado appears in the waters south of Boston, former storm chaser Joe Randall is intrigued by the unusual weather. But as twisters begin to strike across the Boston shoreline, Joe quickly realizes this is no ordinary storm front. As the storms threaten to move inland, the citizens of Boston find themselves trapped in a tempest turning deadlier by the minute. W... Read all

  • Director
    • Jason Bourque
  • Writer
    • Rafael Jordan
  • Stars
    • Paul Johansson
    • Sebastian Spence
    • Miranda Frigon
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • IMDb RATING
    3.0/10
    1.1K
    YOUR RATING
    • Director
      • Jason Bourque
    • Writer
      • Rafael Jordan
    • Stars
      • Paul Johansson
      • Sebastian Spence
      • Miranda Frigon
    • 14User reviews
    • 8Critic reviews
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • See production info at IMDbPro
  • Photos8

    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    View Poster
    + 4
    View Poster

    Top cast24

    Edit
    Paul Johansson
    Paul Johansson
    • Joe Randall
    Sebastian Spence
    Sebastian Spence
    • Lee Carlton
    Miranda Frigon
    Miranda Frigon
    • Maddy
    Jess McLeod
    Jess McLeod
    • Megan
    • (as Jessica McLeod)
    Dylan Schmid
    Dylan Schmid
    • Jackson
    William B. Davis
    William B. Davis
    • Ben
    Grace Vukovic
    Grace Vukovic
    • Julie
    Ben Witmer
    • Jake
    Thea Gill
    Thea Gill
    • Tara Laykin
    Aliyah O'Brien
    Aliyah O'Brien
    • Alicia - FOA Assistant
    Josh Byer
    Josh Byer
    • Stan
    David Allan Pearson
    • Tourist
    Dominika Juillet
    Dominika Juillet
    • Vanessa
    Dalias Blake
    Dalias Blake
    • Defendor 1
    Hugo Steele
    Hugo Steele
    • Player 1
    Katherine Evans
    Katherine Evans
    • Student #1
    Alison Boston
    • Psychic
    Patrick Baynham
    • Owner
    • Director
      • Jason Bourque
    • Writer
      • Rafael Jordan
    • All cast & crew
    • Production, box office & more at IMDbPro

    User reviews14

    3.01K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Featured reviews

    2Calaboss

    Oh Please

    The SyFy folks are nothing if not predictable. All you have to do is look at the director's credits to see what you're in for here. And as to the writer of this nonsense, Rafael Jordan, he has absolutely no shame. He's got a couple dozen of these horrid movies to his credit. I presume someone is paying him to do it, but I can't imagine why.

    Tornadoes tossing boulders. OK. Well, I guess they had to make something, and this is actually no more insipid than Ragin' Cajun Redneck Gators or Chupacabra vs. the Alamo. Do we call this a job well done? If you were aiming to make a stupid movie, then absolutely yes.

    Kudos to all involved here. This movie is a mess and the makers just have to live with that.
    3paul_m_haakonsen

    First sharks, now this... Seriously...?

    Right from the very beginning you know what you are getting yourself into here and knowing what you are going to get. I mean, with a title like "Stonados", isn't it rather obvious? And only on the SyFy Channel would something like this see the light of day.

    "Stonados" is most definitely not amongst the top notch of disaster movies. Far from it, actually. Why? Well, the storyline itself was just rubbish, there was no motivation, no properly coherent red thread throughout the movie. It all just seemed like a bunch of randomness put together and it turned out as this movie.

    The dialogue in the movie was just plain bad. The actors and actresses didn't really have much to work with here. The storyline was against them, the dialogue was against them, and of course, the CGI effects were against them.

    The actors and actresses themselves were actually doing good enough jobs with their limited material they had to work with. So thumbs up for that at least.

    The entire movie just seems pointless and not very entertaining. If you enjoy disaster movies, then there are far better ones available, and amongst those even some also aired from the SyFy Channel.
    5unbrokenmetal

    Disaster movie for the whole family

    'Stonados' are appearing near Boston, i.e. tornadoes which are throwing stones (or exploding ice cubes). A science teacher and a TV journalist try to warn the population and develop a theory what's causing the storm. Two kids are meanwhile not staying home as daddy told them, but they are going to a stadium that will have to be evacuated before the storm arrives.

    The advantage of a disaster movie where they don't have to save the whole planet, but just one city, is that it can tell the story in a more personal way. This is basically a movie for the whole family about a guy who saves his two teenage kids. Nothing extraordinary, but watchable. The funniest moment is when the woman accuses the weather guy of a poor forecast and is immediately killed by a falling stone - clearly a meteorologist's vengeful fantasy. Miranda Frigon from 'Primeval: New World' was the only actor I recognized, she plays the police officer helping the scientist and falling in love with the journalist. Besides, I noticed one cliché that recently appeared a lot in disaster movies: if a camera operator tries to get close to the Dangerous Thing for a good shot, he is always killed. What is it with camera operators that script writers don't like? And where is the trade union when you need them?
    3TheLittleSongbird

    Think Sharknado but as a disaster movie with giant stones/rocks and you have Stonados

    Stonados is one of those movies where you can tell from the title and plot-line that it is not a film to be taken seriously, and that is true of most SyFy original movies actually. It is like Sharknado as a disaster movie with giant stones, except for this viewer it was nowhere near as entertaining. Stonados does have a fun title idea and title, as well as an opening scene that is tense and to the point. The acting is fitting within the genre and the story itself, it is not great but none of it is anywhere near Tara Reid terrible(even the actor playing the man who tries to flirt with Joe's daughter and he was the weak link of the cast), at least the actors actually seem to be concerned about the situation. Stonados does have a very drab look to it though, and a vast majority of the special effects are poorly-textured and hurried-looking, and even for really big rocks the stones seemed out of proportion. There is a lot of dramatic music and there are one too many times where it does get too much and rather sluggish-sounding, while the script has a lot of terrible one-liners, technobabble that has a very make-it-up-as-you-go-along-without-checking-that-it-makes-sense vibe and one of the biggest and most clichéd understatements in any recent movie in "I think we might have ourselves a very big problem." The story had potential but was thinly structured and very predictably and ridiculously told. The science was wacky that you had the feeling that there was little research or scientific background behind the scenes, and then there's so many plot holes the size of large craters to fill a novel listing them. And there was little sense of threat(there were flashes but it was never consistent), thrills or suspense. Sharknado was a long way from great but was fun and kind of a guilty pleasure. That feeling is less frequent and more controlled in Stonados, but actually the movie also tries too hard to be dramatic and comes across as very overly-serious that it also forgets to be fun consequently and is devoid of almost all the ingredients characteristic of a disaster movie. The death scenes are few and between and what there is silly and very tame, again with little threat or sense of danger, and the father-daughter relationship amongst other relationships and dramatic conflicts dissolve into ham-fisted melodrama with no believability factor. The characters, excluding for a second that they are unlikeable stereotypes, we never do get to know, the pacing gets bogged down by the overly-serious tone and the direction also falls flat. Overall, Stonados is the sort of movie that we shouldn't take too seriously but when the movie itself takes itself too seriously it is difficult not to follow suit although you can't take what is thrown at you at face value. This is a case of trying too hard rather than not trying, but while there is far worse out there despite being from those behind Sharknado it wasn't very entertaining for me, sorry. 3/10 Bethany Cox
    1pmf-16582

    So bad that you'll want to sue the producer !

    You know what you gonna get when you start to watch these D-Movies (even worst than a C-Movie, which is already worst than a B-Movie...) :

    Bad acting; Bad screenplay; Bad dialogues; Bad visual effects; Bad story lines; Bad editing; and stupid children;

    To summarize : Bad...Everything!

    Well folks, this thing has it all AND WORST ! In fact, the only good thing about this dud is it's length : 88 minutes. Short enough you'll think but you'll find yourself wondering what else you could've achieve in 88 minutes...

    Stonados is so bad that I would prefer to get a colonoscopy instead of having to watch it again...

    Yup! That bad...

    Dice997

    More like this

    Tempête de glace
    3.6
    Tempête de glace
    Le jugement dernier
    4.0
    Le jugement dernier
    Blue Steel
    5.8
    Blue Steel
    Deadly Voltage
    2.9
    Deadly Voltage
    A l'aube du dernier jour
    3.8
    A l'aube du dernier jour
    Tempête solaire : Au péril de la Terre
    4.5
    Tempête solaire : Au péril de la Terre
    Le Dernier Volcan
    3.8
    Le Dernier Volcan
    Mega Cyclone
    3.8
    Mega Cyclone
    Tornades sur New York
    3.6
    Tornades sur New York
    San Andreas Quake: Magnitude 10
    2.2
    San Andreas Quake: Magnitude 10
    Le feu qui venait du ciel
    4.4
    Le feu qui venait du ciel
    L'enfer de glace
    3.2
    L'enfer de glace

    Storyline

    Edit

    Did you know

    Edit
    • Trivia
      Due to the Boston Marathon bombing on April 15, 2013 Syfy pulled the original April 27 airing due to the movie's Boston setting.
    • Goofs
      In the first 'attack' of the stonados, the stones are bouncing off the large wall at the wharf with great force. But the stone that catches the woman complaining breaks through the wall.
    • Connections
      References James Bond 007 contre Dr. No (1962)

    Top picks

    Sign in to rate and Watchlist for personalized recommendations
    Sign in

    Details

    Edit
    • Release date
      • March 8, 2014 (France)
    • Countries of origin
      • United States
      • Canada
    • Language
      • English
    • Also known as
      • Stone Impact
    • Filming locations
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
    • Production companies
      • MarVista Entertainment
      • Two 4 The Money Media
    • See more company credits at IMDbPro

    Tech specs

    Edit
    • Runtime
      • 1h 28m(88 min)
    • Color
      • Color
    • Aspect ratio
      • 1.78 : 1

    Contribute to this page

    Suggest an edit or add missing content
    • Learn more about contributing
    Edit page

    More to explore

    Recently viewed

    Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
    Get the IMDb App
    Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
    Follow IMDb on social
    Get the IMDb App
    For Android and iOS
    Get the IMDb App
    • Help
    • Site Index
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • License IMDb Data
    • Press Room
    • Advertising
    • Jobs
    • Conditions of Use
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, an Amazon company

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.