"The truth can set you free""The truth can set you free""The truth can set you free"
Ronald Reagan
- Self - U.S. President
- (archive footage)
Michio Kaku
- Self - Professor of Theoretical Physics
- (archive footage)
Carol Rosin
- Self - speaker, author, educator
- (archive footage)
Ellison Onizuka
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (archive footage)
Judith A. Resnik
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (archive footage)
Cady Coleman
- Self - American NASA astronaut
- (archive footage)
- (as Catherine Grace Coleman)
Michael J. Smith
- Self - Challenger Astronaut
- (archive footage)
Featured reviews
"Because their fantasy is instantly debunked with a single photograph from space (see Blue Marble, 1972, for the classic example), flerfs are compelled to deny everything space related."
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
2 @vaulthunter-11946 You do actually know that The Blue Marble is not a photo from space, don't you? There has never been a photo of the whole of earth taken from outer space. The original image taken by Apollo 17 was the most accurate, hi-resolution photo of the Earth ever, but the NASA Blue Marble pic isn't a real photograph. It's a composite of numerous images layered on top of each other.
Created by Robert Simmon, the Photoshop whiz used a 43,200-pixel by 21,600-pixel map of the Earth stitched together by Reto Stöckli. Stöckli used about ten thousand 300-megabyte satellite scenes captured by the Terra satellite over a period of 100 days. But his image was just clean land and sea, having removed all the clouds.
And why are you so rude and angry at people who just want answers to questions about a spherical earth?
Anyone willing to think outside of the box, can put the pieces together that the moon landing was fake. What society calls 'Flat Earthers' are really just heliocentric deniers, and don't necessarily believe the earth is completely flat.
As for the third installment of Hibbler's Level trilogy it focus's more on the second attempt to space where a handful of people supposedly died in the exploding rocket.
The documentary is charged with the plausible theory that no one actually died in the explosion, and most are still living out normal lives. Although it can't really be considered concrete evidence, there is enough to form your own personal opinion.
It also touches a bit on satellites being within our atmosphere, held up by massive helium balloons.
Which is also very true just not widely known! Although the governments tried to keep this under wraps, it has been exposed by too many insiders.
Level With Me is a solid documentary that can stand on its own two feet, but I highly recommend watching the first two to grasp the whole picture. 8/10.
As for the third installment of Hibbler's Level trilogy it focus's more on the second attempt to space where a handful of people supposedly died in the exploding rocket.
The documentary is charged with the plausible theory that no one actually died in the explosion, and most are still living out normal lives. Although it can't really be considered concrete evidence, there is enough to form your own personal opinion.
It also touches a bit on satellites being within our atmosphere, held up by massive helium balloons.
Which is also very true just not widely known! Although the governments tried to keep this under wraps, it has been exposed by too many insiders.
Level With Me is a solid documentary that can stand on its own two feet, but I highly recommend watching the first two to grasp the whole picture. 8/10.
Level With Me - goes into how nasa is scamming billions of tax dollars then lies pushing their outer space agenda for an fake alien invasion which I understood years ago is possible. Level With Me is amazing putting together the nasa lies & how they fake everything they do at the same time msm uses fear mongering to set up the fake alien invasion more & more everyday. Sorry to the powers at be, too many people understand the nonsense from cv19 & more than ever don't trust anything the msm pushes. I also recommend watching "The Next Level" and "Level" the prior sequels explaining Flat Earth & how we believe the nonsense globe model just because it's taught at school from generation to generation only recently.
While this one is an improvement for not having a droning narrator spout baseless assertions for an hour, it's only a slight improvement in that it has a variety of speakers choppily cut together spouting baseless assertions and accusations for an hour. It closes with another appeal to conspiracy and some weak fear-mongering.
As a factual "documentary" it fails on every front, and is more reminescent of 1980's public-access infomercials from various cults (look up the Heaven's Gate VHS tapes for an example).
You could argue that this entire series is a successful record of the wide-ranging baseless conspiracy theories of the early-21st century's flat earth cult. It is fascinating how these ideas find something to resonate with in the vast echo-chambers of social media and the way the resulting mishmash of vague untested ideas, factually incorrect memes, and conspiracy theories tie together for the "true believers" (who are, ironically, urging other people to questions the liars). In that sense, this film and the others in the series might be worthwhile for current and future social scientists who are researching the way online cults form.
For everyone else, this is a bad-faith attempt at a "documentary" that's nearly unwatchable. Believe the bad reviews, save your time, and watch anything else.
As a factual "documentary" it fails on every front, and is more reminescent of 1980's public-access infomercials from various cults (look up the Heaven's Gate VHS tapes for an example).
You could argue that this entire series is a successful record of the wide-ranging baseless conspiracy theories of the early-21st century's flat earth cult. It is fascinating how these ideas find something to resonate with in the vast echo-chambers of social media and the way the resulting mishmash of vague untested ideas, factually incorrect memes, and conspiracy theories tie together for the "true believers" (who are, ironically, urging other people to questions the liars). In that sense, this film and the others in the series might be worthwhile for current and future social scientists who are researching the way online cults form.
For everyone else, this is a bad-faith attempt at a "documentary" that's nearly unwatchable. Believe the bad reviews, save your time, and watch anything else.
If this had been presented as a satire, it would work. Sadly, they think this rubbish is true. I've never seen such a twisted, border-line insane take on science.
How this currently as a four star rating is a mind-numbing mystery. It's proof of how many uneducated, naive and gullible people there are who will believe patently false nonsense.
Every true scientist should be posting reviews, although this is so ridiculous as to not even require debunking. Why someone would chose to believe something that can be proved incorrect through a variety of real-world observations without scientific instruments is shocking.
How this currently as a four star rating is a mind-numbing mystery. It's proof of how many uneducated, naive and gullible people there are who will believe patently false nonsense.
Every true scientist should be posting reviews, although this is so ridiculous as to not even require debunking. Why someone would chose to believe something that can be proved incorrect through a variety of real-world observations without scientific instruments is shocking.
- How long is Level with Me?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $45,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 7m(67 min)
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content