Unsealed: Conspiracy Files investigates the previously top-secret files made public by the Freedom of Information Act. Based on the new information discovered, the show re-examines faulty as... Read allUnsealed: Conspiracy Files investigates the previously top-secret files made public by the Freedom of Information Act. Based on the new information discovered, the show re-examines faulty assumptions and searches for inconsistencies.Unsealed: Conspiracy Files investigates the previously top-secret files made public by the Freedom of Information Act. Based on the new information discovered, the show re-examines faulty assumptions and searches for inconsistencies.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
The concept of this show is very interesting, however, the narrator's voice makes it unwatchable. His voice is beyond irritating. Regardless of my interest in the topic, I couldn't make it through the first episode because of the narrator's irksome voice. I would rather stab myself in the eye with a pencil than hear his voice again. His tone and inflection are over dramatic and beyond irritating. I'm not sure why producers of this show chose him to narrate. Each time that he introduced new facts or information, I would cringe at his superficial yet sinister tone. Whilst I do understand the reason behind having an individual with a deep and resonating voice narrate this type of show, someone missed the mark by choosing this guy!
This series appears simply to give a few selected conspiracy authors a free platform from which to spew unopposed a string of speculative, unsupported nonsense -- much of it debunked long ago by people who actually know the facts and relevant sciences. Far from relying upon "unsealed" official records as promised in the title and opening, the program simply presents the same conjectural hogwash these charlatan authors have been selling in their books and videos for years. There is no disclosure, no critical analysis, and no attention whatsoever devoted to opposing interpretations. Just a pile of conspiratorial woo-woo.
Worth watching to know how far the ridiculousness of a documentary can go. It is actually a quite entertaining in a strange demented way, devoid of any relevant facts or truths, just sensationalist and bombastic flashes on the screen accompanied with occasional explosions (mostly atomic), people screaming and deep narrator voice. It has no any documentary relevance or value, it is just sensationalist garbage with no objections to blatantly lie about some subjects. All in all it is 30 min of just pure dark sensationalism worth of some dark entertainment nothing more.
One might think that producers of this excuse for a show have their own conspiracy going on against sanity of its viewers.
One might think that producers of this excuse for a show have their own conspiracy going on against sanity of its viewers.
This show is NOT for people who cannot handle FACTS. And just because some dummy on Youtube, or someone that works for the government made a debunking video on these issues, doesn't mean they are debunked. I admit, theirs a few stories in these episodes that may or may not be true, but most are in your face facts. Don't be closed minded and believe everything that the MAN tells you!
10zhengst
As a result, this show is only fit for a small audience, since sadly the majority of today's consumers are tunnel-visioned and cleanly brain-washed, as exemplified by those one-star reviewers. This may be why the show has only one season.
Main drawback is that each episode is too short and very rushed. They cram a lot of info into very short time frames. It makes one feel that they make sensational claims without enough substantiation. Also there're limited talking heads when high caliber expert interviews are definitely needed in this type of presentations. As a result, the show turns out to be a primer on those topics and leaves a lot of rooms for the audience to do their own research. But guess how many people will take that effort?
Main drawback is that each episode is too short and very rushed. They cram a lot of info into very short time frames. It makes one feel that they make sensational claims without enough substantiation. Also there're limited talking heads when high caliber expert interviews are definitely needed in this type of presentations. As a result, the show turns out to be a primer on those topics and leaves a lot of rooms for the audience to do their own research. But guess how many people will take that effort?
Details
- Runtime
- 30m
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content