It centres on a police investigation of the disappearance of young women who disappeared from the streets of Claremont and the 25 year race to capture a killer.It centres on a police investigation of the disappearance of young women who disappeared from the streets of Claremont and the 25 year race to capture a killer.It centres on a police investigation of the disappearance of young women who disappeared from the streets of Claremont and the 25 year race to capture a killer.
- Awards
- 3 nominations total
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Both the problem and the strength of this two-part police procedural is that it's based -- quite closely, it would seem -- on a string of three actual murders. As a result, it feels very real, especially as to police errors and inefficiency, as well as to the long time involved in bringing the case to a close. To its credit, it is anything but "neat."
On the other hand, thanks to its apparent allegiance to the truth, the case itself isn't terribly gripping. Obviously any serial-killer drama will have inherent interest -- we want to see the monster brought to justice -- but I doubt you'll come away entirely satisfied.
Worse, the characters (as some have complained here) are bland, and their dialogue consists almost entirely of exposition, often of one cop telling another something the latter would already know, simply to explain the progress of the case to the TV audience. (There's also one cringeworthy little attempt to inject some romance into the plot.) Sometimes the task of exposition is left to a local TV reporter who conveniently keeps popping up. She's rather annoying.
Brief as it is, the entire series feels at least half an hour too long, with too much uncomfortable time devoted to the grief of the victims' bereaved families. And there's something just a little off, even a little amateurish, about the direction; cast members tend to stand with unnatural stiffness as they exchange their curt, exposition-laden dialogue.
On the other hand, thanks to its apparent allegiance to the truth, the case itself isn't terribly gripping. Obviously any serial-killer drama will have inherent interest -- we want to see the monster brought to justice -- but I doubt you'll come away entirely satisfied.
Worse, the characters (as some have complained here) are bland, and their dialogue consists almost entirely of exposition, often of one cop telling another something the latter would already know, simply to explain the progress of the case to the TV audience. (There's also one cringeworthy little attempt to inject some romance into the plot.) Sometimes the task of exposition is left to a local TV reporter who conveniently keeps popping up. She's rather annoying.
Brief as it is, the entire series feels at least half an hour too long, with too much uncomfortable time devoted to the grief of the victims' bereaved families. And there's something just a little off, even a little amateurish, about the direction; cast members tend to stand with unnatural stiffness as they exchange their curt, exposition-laden dialogue.
Overall, this mini series could have been cut by 50% time-wise. The plot based on actual serial killings in Western Australia was intriguing. It took the police decades to find the killer who eluded them due to conflicting eyewitness accounts, an odd coincidence with a company van, and set during a time when DNA testing was not
perfected. The police had everything working against them it seemed. I found the two main police investigators annoying because they always seemed on the brink of tears. I
understood their frustration level as each time they took a step forward they took a step back toward solving the case. But tears at the workplace is very unprofessional especially for seasoned detectives. I blame the director for this uncharacteristic portrayal. The actors who played victims and family members were believable and should be commended.
This is a very sad story, and I hope the one family can finally get closure in the not too distant future. Any murder is, of course, extremely sad and disgusting. There's never an excuse. I personally do not believe in the death penalty, which is probably not an option in Australia anyway. In my opinion, a person that commits murder should just sit in a prison with no chance of getting out and living a life that they could've had if they didn't do such terrible things. I can only imagine the grief of the families who have lost loved ones to murder. I even feel sorry for the family members of the murderer. If they were good people which is not always the case I don't think it's that unusual for a murderer to have had a violent or very terrible childhood.
Very well done portrayal of a real case that took years to resolve.
At least they was some closure, apart from the poor family of one girl.
So often in these stories the perpetrator is never found, but improvement in technology and DNA sampling resulted in the right man coming to justice.
However, this doesn't make up for the poor soul who was the prime suspect for too long.
The way the actualities of the crimes were described rather than shown visually and the fact that these were not gratuitous was also a credit to the producers.
They told the story over two episodes and this helped illustrate the extraordinary length of time the case actually took.
At least they was some closure, apart from the poor family of one girl.
So often in these stories the perpetrator is never found, but improvement in technology and DNA sampling resulted in the right man coming to justice.
However, this doesn't make up for the poor soul who was the prime suspect for too long.
The way the actualities of the crimes were described rather than shown visually and the fact that these were not gratuitous was also a credit to the producers.
They told the story over two episodes and this helped illustrate the extraordinary length of time the case actually took.
I wanted to like this but it was so slow. The characters weren't engaging enough to like, they appeared as wooden depictions of real people. The script just seemed to be all over the place. The long close up shots of the characters doing nothing just seemed weird. I was thinking am I missing something here, but no, it appeared to be part of the style of filming. Sometimes it works but not on this show. We tried to finish the first episode but couldn't summon up enough interest. There were some good actors in the show but even they couldn't salvage an unwatchable episode. I realised I was listening and not watching and using my tablet to read things at the same time.
Did you know
- TriviaThe murders happened over a 15 month period (possibly extended to 5 years if 3 further probable murders in the area are attributed to the same killer) and yet he was not brought to justice until almost a quarter of a century later, thanks in part to advances in DNA. It is the most expensive Police investigation in Western Australia.
- How many seasons does The Claremont Murders have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Убийства в Клермонте
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime4 hours
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content