IMDb RATING
5.4/10
808
YOUR RATING
To keep the family home from being sold, the four very modern March sisters tackle home improvements on their own. But their romantic entanglements involving the boy next door, an old flame,... Read allTo keep the family home from being sold, the four very modern March sisters tackle home improvements on their own. But their romantic entanglements involving the boy next door, an old flame, and a new acquaintance become a distraction.To keep the family home from being sold, the four very modern March sisters tackle home improvements on their own. But their romantic entanglements involving the boy next door, an old flame, and a new acquaintance become a distraction.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Julie Berman
- Jo March
- (as Julie Marie Berman)
Enoch-Jude Danquah
- Sexy Cowboy
- (as Enoch Danquah)
Kevin G. Cox
- Lone Ranger
- (as Kevin Cox)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I didn't really expect to like this but had to watch it because Little Women is my favorite book. After getting over my self-righteous anger about Jo being a blonde and the cringe-worthy early scene at the Halloween party, I began to appreciate the nods to events in the book and the creative way the writers modernized everything. And at least the plot is not the typical "girl goes home for Christmas and dumps rich, arrogant fiancé for sweet hometown boy." I also liked most of the casting found myself smiling as I watched.
Definitely doesn't compare to the book, but enjoyable to watch.
Definitely doesn't compare to the book, but enjoyable to watch.
Its hard to screw up a movie when the template is "Little Women" but they sure do come close. Its is a modern adaption and I can see the reasoning for doing this. It has been done several by theatrical films (Clueless was an adaption of Emma) however this TV-movie fails on several fronts.
In this film all these "Little Women" are in their 20's and still live at home. In this adaption all of the "March Women" go bonkers when "Mom Decides to sell the family home". What was strange was the script has them still acting with the maturity of JR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS instead of 20 something women.
This production should have had Joe a lesbian and her editor a woman.
If you never read "Little Women" shame on you. If you have then you will see how this movie fails.
If you never read or seen "Little Women" then chances are you might like this. Plus chances are you also love "The Kardashians"
In this film all these "Little Women" are in their 20's and still live at home. In this adaption all of the "March Women" go bonkers when "Mom Decides to sell the family home". What was strange was the script has them still acting with the maturity of JR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS instead of 20 something women.
This production should have had Joe a lesbian and her editor a woman.
If you never read "Little Women" shame on you. If you have then you will see how this movie fails.
If you never read or seen "Little Women" then chances are you might like this. Plus chances are you also love "The Kardashians"
If you grew up a fan of Little Women, if you always felt like you should be apart of the March Family then you were probably excited when you caught wind of this modernized retelling of Louisa May Alcott's classic coming of age tale. Well sorry to disappoint but despite the potential a modernized Little Women might promise, The March Sisters at Christmas did not deliver. In place of the transcendentalist principles practiced by the humble little Marches who practiced temperance, and acts of charity in the original tale, the Marches in this modern retelling are portrayed as selfish, slutty young women who party a little too hard partially in the case of Amy. I can't say which I was more disappointed with the fact that this new skankified Amy March posted naked pictures of herself on Jo's twitter feed to parallel the treacherous burning of Jo's manuscript, or her exploited relationship with Teddy. Where the original tale illustrates Amy's loyalty to Jo when she resists Laurie/Teddy because she feels he still belongs to Jo, The March Sisters at Christmas represented her as a conniving little slut just waiting to pounce to so she might have vengeance on her sister. I will say we can probably all own up to the fact that growing Amy March was that one character who we all just wanted to choke but she was never meant to be the villain and as bratty as her behavior can be sometimes she was never portrayed as being quite so insufferable as this movie as made her out to be. I hate to sound like that annoying person who just compares movies to the book their based on and fusses over minute details, and I assure that's not the point I'm trying to get across here. I feel that this movie lost the essence of a family tied together in love, trying to change the world and make it a better place. The Marches are role models and at the same time characters young girls should be able to relate to. They lost that by making Amy so unlikable. Instead of being someone young girl's can relate to she became that girl the little slut who stole everyone's boyfriends in high school, that girl that everyone loved to hate. Despite her shortcomings Amy is is multidimensional and has a lot of good to her that I feel was just completely tossed aside.
This was fun and entertaining and the plot centers on Orchard House. A lot of the events portrayed are based on the novel. The sisters' personalities are also well crafted. The casting was good.
The movie was a better than other adaptations I've seen.
The movie was a better than other adaptations I've seen.
Loosely based on Alcott's "Little Women", the March Sister's are of course Jo, Meg, Beth and Amy and in this story they are trying to stop their parents from selling their family home, with all the trouble of boys to contend with at the same time.
I like the fact that there is more than one story going on, even if some outshine the others, but it makes a change for a Christmas film to have a different formula, other than boy meets girl!
As a writer myself, I enjoy that element of the story, but the character of Jo is played as a very mean, quite b*tchy and bossy cow, who's gobby loudness gets a bit much at times. The other three seem to fit the parts well though.
I'm not sure why Lex Luther lives next door, but the handsome Teddy and Marcus help the story if you enjoy some man candy.
Another enjoyable and easy to watch film.
I like the fact that there is more than one story going on, even if some outshine the others, but it makes a change for a Christmas film to have a different formula, other than boy meets girl!
As a writer myself, I enjoy that element of the story, but the character of Jo is played as a very mean, quite b*tchy and bossy cow, who's gobby loudness gets a bit much at times. The other three seem to fit the parts well though.
I'm not sure why Lex Luther lives next door, but the handsome Teddy and Marcus help the story if you enjoy some man candy.
Another enjoyable and easy to watch film.
Did you know
- TriviaIn the beginning of the movie, one of the girls rides her bike past Orchard House - the family home of Louisa May Alcott, the author of "Little Women" on which this movie is loosely based.
- GoofsThe famous music school in Boston is spelled Berklee, not Berkley as it appears on the dream and achievement boards Meg gives to Beth.
- SoundtracksNorton 850
Written by J. Stuart Esty
Performed by The RoadKill Orchestra
Courtesy of The RoadKill Orchestra
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- The March Sisters at Christmas
- Filming locations
- Worcester, Massachusetts, USA(Worcester Telegram and Gazette)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 31 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
Top Gap
By what name was Le Noël des sœurs March (2012) officially released in Canada in English?
Answer