A few weeks before a big airshow, Ace gets his acceptance letter to take part in the competition to become the next champion.A few weeks before a big airshow, Ace gets his acceptance letter to take part in the competition to become the next champion.A few weeks before a big airshow, Ace gets his acceptance letter to take part in the competition to become the next champion.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Antonina Berezka
- Molniya
- (voice)
Jeff Berg
- Blue Baron
- (voice)
Gregg Berger
- Announcer Andy
- (voice)
- …
David Boat
- Davidson
- (voice)
Ben Diskin
- Patrick
- (voice)
- …
Hilary Duff
- Windy
- (English version)
- (voice)
Josh Duhamel
- Ace
- (English version)
- (voice)
Ron Fleishman
- Yellow Tractor
- (voice)
Aleksey Frandetti
- Vityas
- (voice)
Valentin Gaft
- Byvaly
- (voice)
Aleksandr Golovin
- Baloban
- (voice)
Wes Hubbard
- Hawk
- (voice)
Aleksandr Lenkov
- Mikhalych
- (voice)
Jesse McCartney
- Cyclone
- (English version)
- (voice)
Andrey Merzlikin
- Grom
- (voice)
Featured reviews
It is unclear on whats happening and when, its overall confusing and takes to long to get to the point. I would not recommend this movie to anyone of any age. My 7 year old boy actually hates it. Don't watch it unless you want to spend almost 1 and a half hours bored.
This is the only mockbuster I can call my favorite. Cute animation, and famous actors. Not to mention the theme song.
This movie is regrettable. The story was weak, animation was not too great, and it felt like they were coping Disney's Planes. When I first started watching this, I got 1 minute into the movie, and I knew I had made a mistake. I mean that 1 hour and 40 minutes I can't get back in my life! Waste of my time! The only decent character was the Chicken looking guy. It didn't keep my attention, had to put glasses on to see what I was looking at, and like I said the story line didn't hold up. I don't even why I got this movie to be honest. But most of all its a clean film so I'll give them that. So this movie wasn't for me, I don't know if you would want to watch it, but I don't recommend this film, but if you want a good laugh watch it, its terrible.
I knew this movie was going to be somewhat "b-grade" and riding on the coat tails of Disney's Planes... but I wasn't expecting such an overall bad movie. It was seriously terrible. TERRIBLE. I wonder if the better known actors that appeared in the movie knew what the producers were planning to release. The dialog didn't even flow. It was a very basic and done-before plot and they couldn't even make it hold my kids attention. They love movie night. But this just had them bored, they got up and found their toys and played in front of the TV, not even looking up. Like they knew it wasn't a real movie. No character depth (at all). Bad animation that was just clearly trying to copy a "style" of Pixar - but didn't cut it in any way. This was a waste of my money and my kids time. I was bitterly disappointed and am somewhat angry (partly at my self for not looking at reviews first) that I ever got this movie for them. Don't see this movie, it doesn't deserve any attention. It's shameful.
While Disney's Planes from personal opinion wasn't particularly good, not a plane wreck but disappointingly lazy, it is much better than this. The two are being compared due to Wings being advertised in a way that viewers immediately think that 'this is a rip-off of Planes.'
The good news is that Wings is certainly not as blatant or as insulting as most animated mock busters are, it's derivative of Cars (like Planes was) but seeing as Wings' release dates predate those for Planes I am not going to be so hasty to call it a rip-off regardless of the advertising. What stops Wings from being rated any less is a few solid character designs, not as creepy or as robotic as feared. Other than that Wings never does take off, and crashes and burns when at its worst.
Most of the animation is not very good. There's worse computer animation out there (even the worst of it is nowhere near Video Brinquedo or Spark Plug Entertainment bad), but apart from the character designs the lack of budget and polish shows in the flat colours, some very stiff movement and framing and less than handsome and polished backgrounds, some of it looking out of sync too and the flying sequences lack energy and are choppily edited. The soundtrack is reasonably pleasant and rousing on its own but doesn't quite work within the film; there are numerous moments in Wings where the music just doesn't fit with the action. Apparently it was different in the original Russian version, and there are times where you can tell that there were changes, especially in the soundtrack, the dialogue and some of the animation, and the original version probably would have fitted better.
In terms of writing Wings fares very poorly. The dialogue plays it far too safe, and lacks any spark, instead being very flat and shallow throughout. It's not insultingly juvenile or over-complicated, it just feels bland, with some of it feeling rambling or not particularly relevant. The story fails to maintain momentum, with its 88 minute running time starting to feel too long even as much as halfway through (Planes' story was very lazy and it was not one of the stronger assets of Cars either, except nowhere near as bad, but the storytelling in Wings is even lazier). Like the dialogue, some parts are played too safe with the flying lacking energy, invention or danger, action is very sedate in the early parts, while the latter half becomes muddled and some of the story felt jumpy and incomplete.
The characters while decently designed are rather cookie-cutter and have little personality or personality to hold one's attention. Dodo comes over as obnoxious, Cyclone is a dull villain who is more of a rival bully sort of character (which doesn't come over convincingly due to the lack of tension between the characters) whose comeuppance is incredibly rushed and the leads are inoffensive but with little to make them stand out. The voice acting is competent (although Rob Schneider really gets on the nerves), but fits in the category of just about getting the job done but with not much to distinguish themselves.
All in all, there's worse to be had, to be sure, than Wings, but it never does take off, feeling too bland, too safe, sometimes muddled and forgettable. 2/10 Bethany Cox
The good news is that Wings is certainly not as blatant or as insulting as most animated mock busters are, it's derivative of Cars (like Planes was) but seeing as Wings' release dates predate those for Planes I am not going to be so hasty to call it a rip-off regardless of the advertising. What stops Wings from being rated any less is a few solid character designs, not as creepy or as robotic as feared. Other than that Wings never does take off, and crashes and burns when at its worst.
Most of the animation is not very good. There's worse computer animation out there (even the worst of it is nowhere near Video Brinquedo or Spark Plug Entertainment bad), but apart from the character designs the lack of budget and polish shows in the flat colours, some very stiff movement and framing and less than handsome and polished backgrounds, some of it looking out of sync too and the flying sequences lack energy and are choppily edited. The soundtrack is reasonably pleasant and rousing on its own but doesn't quite work within the film; there are numerous moments in Wings where the music just doesn't fit with the action. Apparently it was different in the original Russian version, and there are times where you can tell that there were changes, especially in the soundtrack, the dialogue and some of the animation, and the original version probably would have fitted better.
In terms of writing Wings fares very poorly. The dialogue plays it far too safe, and lacks any spark, instead being very flat and shallow throughout. It's not insultingly juvenile or over-complicated, it just feels bland, with some of it feeling rambling or not particularly relevant. The story fails to maintain momentum, with its 88 minute running time starting to feel too long even as much as halfway through (Planes' story was very lazy and it was not one of the stronger assets of Cars either, except nowhere near as bad, but the storytelling in Wings is even lazier). Like the dialogue, some parts are played too safe with the flying lacking energy, invention or danger, action is very sedate in the early parts, while the latter half becomes muddled and some of the story felt jumpy and incomplete.
The characters while decently designed are rather cookie-cutter and have little personality or personality to hold one's attention. Dodo comes over as obnoxious, Cyclone is a dull villain who is more of a rival bully sort of character (which doesn't come over convincingly due to the lack of tension between the characters) whose comeuppance is incredibly rushed and the leads are inoffensive but with little to make them stand out. The voice acting is competent (although Rob Schneider really gets on the nerves), but fits in the category of just about getting the job done but with not much to distinguish themselves.
All in all, there's worse to be had, to be sure, than Wings, but it never does take off, feeling too bland, too safe, sometimes muddled and forgettable. 2/10 Bethany Cox
Did you know
- TriviaDespite popular belief, the cartoon is not a copy of "Planes", as it was released a year earlier. At the time of release, the style of the cartoon was presented as "Cars", only with planes.
- Alternate versionsThe score for the English-language version was composed by Ramón Balcázar
- ConnectionsFollowed by Wings: Sky Force Heroes (2014)
- How long is Wings?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $2,250,147
- Runtime
- 1h 24m(84 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content