$ellebrity

$ellebrity is suppose to be a critical look at the media focus on celebrity, which is a very serious issue. Many in the public are more aware of who someone famous is dating than what genocides or wars are going on in the world. The documentary does manage to put the phenomenon in a historical context, but the problem lies with how it is made. It is done in tabloid style.

Sensational anecdotes and the importance of what famous people think is the focus. The Hollywood elites do have a valuable perspective, but their words shouldn't carry all the weight. Some of them are unsurprisingly overwrought, particular Jennifer Lopez. The girl from the Bronx who so badly wanted to be famous, can't stop complaining about her life in the film. Being that well-known is a burden, and living without anonymity is difficult, but they knew it came with their field. They were aware of what they were getting into. Sociology experts on the effects of fame could have added some depth to these interviews.

What it comes down to, is that $ellebrity doesn't have anything important to say. Yes, paparazzi act uncivilized and seek to make-up stories, but what part of the media doesn't? With the industry having been taken over by corporations, the bottom line rules over all decisions, and people want simple, outrageous stories. The documentary ends by blaming the readers; however, they aren't really the source of the dilemma. The pure focus on the cash is. Kevin Mazur should have taken a cue from his title.

I, and others, are in agreement, considering this movie has been in limited release, that all the "1" scores are given by paparazzi trying to sink this movie, as one person stated. IMDb needs to step in and review this, and the fact that many of these reviews are coming from outside the US. This is a really good and interesting movie, and there is no reason, whatsoever, there should be so many "1" and "2" ratings.

It seems pretty apparent that the bullying tactics of paparazzi discussed in the movie are being used here. It's also apparent that they are scared, and they SHOULD be, because it's only a matter of time before legislation is passed, making what they do illegal, at least, in this country. When they said, "Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," they included everyone, not just non-celebrities. If we do not stop them now, they may feel they can shoot anyone they want in the near future. This needs to stop .... before someone else dies ... and I'm hoping California will be the first state to make it illegal, or at the very least, set strict laws and guidelines preventing most of what they do. If California needs $money$, then it'll be a good way to gather revenue.

I thought this film (which is actually a documentary) was pretty interesting. I liked hearing celebrities honestly talking about the paparazzi. I did get very depressed by especially the part about the kids of celebrities being chased by all these flashes, that really has to stop. And I just got the urge to punch some of the paparazzi that were in this. But the structure of this documentary is pretty good and I think the only reason it has such a low rating is because (other people have mentioned this) paparazzi are just don't want people to see this. Because they're horrible. But if you're interested in Hollywood, in celebrities, or if you like Jennifer Aniston (who doesn't?), you should check this one out.

This is a fun not so little documentary about celebrities and paparazzi. There are several laughs along the way, and you can hear some of the experiences from the celebs mouths.

Other interviewed, are paparazzo, editors, readers of tabloids, and there is a little history lesson about how this all came about and how it used to be "back in the day".

To me it was all very interesting and honest in it's portrayal of how it is the walk the street or step out of your car as a celebrity. They cover people who aim to be stalked by the paparazzi as well as the children of celebs who plead for people to stop taking pictures. In that one moment, where Travis' son was asking to be left alone, it's hard not to feel bad for just witnessing what is being done to this child.

I'm one of those people who have never purchased a celebrity tabloid magazine. I do scan the covers while waiting in obnoxiously long lines at the market and I do now and then click a link about a celebrity, but I have never qu8te understood the people who buy this junk. The kind of people who talk about celebrities when you ask them how they are doing, as if that's their life. I find it a little pathetic.

At no point in the documentary do they explicitly say where the line is overall, and I don't think anybody really knows. Some say it definitely starts with the children, but people want to see little Suri. And sometimes I figure, Katie Holmes wants to show her off. It's hard to know where the line is... but for me, it's not making celebrities' daily activities a part of my daily life. They are just people, after all, and my life has to be more important to me than theirs.

Excellent telling of an important tale.

Just because a person has chosen to be famous or is an actor or performer there are boundaries that we have crossed in our culture.

Those crossed boundaries are creating a culture that we are beginning to regret.

A course correction is needed and perhaps the viewer will see that to be true. As I watched this I asked myself: What makes it okay to invade people's privacy to the degree that we have allowed? What makes it my business to see private moments that were stolen for a buck? Might want to ask ourselves who we are becoming by tolerating this to the degree that it occurs. Where do we draw the line? What makes children fair game? I think this film is a useful cautionary tale. Once the genie is out of the bottle where does it stop?