Common Outlaws

The movie starts off looking like it's set in the 1930's or 40's due to clothing and the vehicles. But, then when it is supposed to be 15 yrs later, they are still using vehicles from the 1940's and 50's, the clothing is not from the 40's, the furniture and language is not from the 40's. It looks more like the 60's or 70's. For instance, the vehicles used in the beginning of the movies are from the 30's and 40's, then 15 yrs later, there's air vents, lighting fixtures, a stove, decor from the 70's, there's even modern lamps, etc., but all the vehicles are still from the 40's or 50's. This makes it very confusing. I never really understood what era this movie was supposed to be set in. Some of the acting was not good, but, this wasn't supposed to be a high budget movie... so, that's understandable.

This could have been a good film. The script was decent enough for most parts, except it was a 100 years out of time (gunslinging wild west set in the 50's or so?). The acting was desperately bad with even worse "over acting" at points. The camera work was just bad for most of the film. I've seen student films with better camera work! Too many cheesy lines thrown in with bad acted delivery. I'm a fan of low budget films and the wild west, but this was just painful to sit through. i did turn it off, but later finished it.

who ever wrote the great review that made me say yes to watching this movie, is either a friend of the film makers or watched a different film to the one in question.

awful, but a really nice try at this genre.

2 1/2 purely for the attempt.