A teenage girl gets more than she bargained for for her birthday when her workaholic dad buys her a cute pet monkey that grows wings, fangs, and an insatiable thirst for blood when the sun g... Read allA teenage girl gets more than she bargained for for her birthday when her workaholic dad buys her a cute pet monkey that grows wings, fangs, and an insatiable thirst for blood when the sun goes down.A teenage girl gets more than she bargained for for her birthday when her workaholic dad buys her a cute pet monkey that grows wings, fangs, and an insatiable thirst for blood when the sun goes down.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Christopher Matthew Cook
- Rudy
- (as Matt Cook)
Electra Stone
- Sonya
- (as Electra Avellan)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Flying Monkeys (2013)
** (out of 4)
The latest from SyFy centers on a father (Vincent Ventresca) who is late to his daughter's (Maika Monroe) graduation so as a make- up gift he buys her a monkey. What he doesn't know is that this monkey is actually a shape shifter that can grow wings as well as grow in size and likes to eat humans. FLYING MONKEYS is pretty much what you'd expect from a movie that shows up on SyFy but I think for the most part it's slightly entertaining and ranks as one of the better things to turn up on the channel at nine o'clock. I know that's not saying too much since there's a lot of bad movies on there but this one here actually works on a few levels. For starters, I thought both Ventresca and Monroe were good in their parts and they certainly helped keep the film interesting and moving along. I thought both of them fit their roles just fine and their performances were certainly better than you normally see in a film like this. The supporting players, while not perfect, were also entertaining in their roles. I can't say the father-daughter subplot was all that great but it's certainly better than what most "B" movies offer up. Another thing that actually works are the CGI monkeys. Yes, the thought of a flying monkey is rather silly but I still thought the special effects were better than most. For starters, unlike so many movies, this one here didn't try to make the monsters bigger than Godzilla (remember the channel's BIGFOOT?) and instead of making them look fake, they actually went the extra mile to make them look realistic or at least as realistic as a flying monkey can be. The CGI wasn't over-the-top nor was it so bad that you couldn't believe what you were watching. First-time director Robert Grasmere has worked on several big films so he's obviously been around talent. I think he actually did a good job considering what the material was. Of course, this is still a SyFy "B" movie so I'd be interesting in seeing what he does from here as well as the cast members.
** (out of 4)
The latest from SyFy centers on a father (Vincent Ventresca) who is late to his daughter's (Maika Monroe) graduation so as a make- up gift he buys her a monkey. What he doesn't know is that this monkey is actually a shape shifter that can grow wings as well as grow in size and likes to eat humans. FLYING MONKEYS is pretty much what you'd expect from a movie that shows up on SyFy but I think for the most part it's slightly entertaining and ranks as one of the better things to turn up on the channel at nine o'clock. I know that's not saying too much since there's a lot of bad movies on there but this one here actually works on a few levels. For starters, I thought both Ventresca and Monroe were good in their parts and they certainly helped keep the film interesting and moving along. I thought both of them fit their roles just fine and their performances were certainly better than you normally see in a film like this. The supporting players, while not perfect, were also entertaining in their roles. I can't say the father-daughter subplot was all that great but it's certainly better than what most "B" movies offer up. Another thing that actually works are the CGI monkeys. Yes, the thought of a flying monkey is rather silly but I still thought the special effects were better than most. For starters, unlike so many movies, this one here didn't try to make the monsters bigger than Godzilla (remember the channel's BIGFOOT?) and instead of making them look fake, they actually went the extra mile to make them look realistic or at least as realistic as a flying monkey can be. The CGI wasn't over-the-top nor was it so bad that you couldn't believe what you were watching. First-time director Robert Grasmere has worked on several big films so he's obviously been around talent. I think he actually did a good job considering what the material was. Of course, this is still a SyFy "B" movie so I'd be interesting in seeing what he does from here as well as the cast members.
The CGI creature was enough to let me know I'd be wasting my time if I sat through any more.
The acting was terrible, the graphics awful. Really bad film. Wish I'd not wasted my time.
After failing to get to his daughter Joan's high school graduation on time her father decides to make amends by buying her a pet. Unfortunately the monkey he gets is not what it seems; as soon as it gets dark the monkey transforms into a demon-flying monkey which flies off to hunt live prey; largely the unsuspecting inhabitants of Joan's home town of Gale, Kansas. If that wasn't enough if it is shot and wounded it quickly recovers and becomes two creatures! The monkey was smuggled into America on a flight from China where a pair of locals are hunting the creature with ancient weapons; the only things that can actually kill the beasts... will they be able to track the last such creature to Gale before it is too late?
It must be said this film is rather trashy; it is made for TV and distinctly feels like it. That said if you are in the right mood it is rather enjoyable. The idea of the flying monkeys clearly comes from 'The Wizard of Oz' and the film nicely adds a few more references, it is set in Kansas, in a town called Gale, a clear nod to Dorothy Gale and there is even a scarecrow opposite her house. The plot is pretty basic but serves to give plenty of monkey attacks; unfortunately these feel a bit too tame; presumably due to restrictions on what can be put in a TV movie. The acting ranges from good enough to a bit ropey but that doesn't matter too much; nobody went into this expecting award winning performances. On the plus side a lack of swearing and nudity as well as nothing really disturbing means this can be viewed by slightly younger viewers than most horror films. Overall I'd only recommend this to fans of trashy horror.
It must be said this film is rather trashy; it is made for TV and distinctly feels like it. That said if you are in the right mood it is rather enjoyable. The idea of the flying monkeys clearly comes from 'The Wizard of Oz' and the film nicely adds a few more references, it is set in Kansas, in a town called Gale, a clear nod to Dorothy Gale and there is even a scarecrow opposite her house. The plot is pretty basic but serves to give plenty of monkey attacks; unfortunately these feel a bit too tame; presumably due to restrictions on what can be put in a TV movie. The acting ranges from good enough to a bit ropey but that doesn't matter too much; nobody went into this expecting award winning performances. On the plus side a lack of swearing and nudity as well as nothing really disturbing means this can be viewed by slightly younger viewers than most horror films. Overall I'd only recommend this to fans of trashy horror.
Leaving a serious review for this film is what a stupid person would do. It's cheese. It's fun. But you gotta be into that sort of thing. If your not just don't watch or review it.
Did you know
- GoofsOn the way to the sugar mill, the emergency lights on the sheriff's car change from red/white to blue/white several times.
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 26m(86 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content