An online stalker torments a young woman.An online stalker torments a young woman.An online stalker torments a young woman.
Peter Michael Dillon
- Detective Bonham
- (as Peter Dillon)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Cyberstalker also known as Offline is a made for cable Lifetime television film starring Mischa Barton who plays Aidan whose parents were murdered 13 years earlier. The killer was never caught which still taxes the detective in charge. Now she spends time as a reclusive artist but it seems the cyberstalker is back to terrorise her.
The film is low budget, quickly shot, formulaic but rather watchable if you switch your brain offline. The culprit could only be the characters we have been introduced to which could be the detective, her new boyfriend, the Svengali gallery owner or the wheelchair bound computer expert newly employed by the police.
I reckon there is no need for Columbo or Sherlock to solve this whodunit. There is plenty of silliness as our cyberstalker can hack into and control traffic lights for example. Still Lifetime know which audience to aim their films at, its female friendly with enough thrills to keep you mildly entertained.
The film is low budget, quickly shot, formulaic but rather watchable if you switch your brain offline. The culprit could only be the characters we have been introduced to which could be the detective, her new boyfriend, the Svengali gallery owner or the wheelchair bound computer expert newly employed by the police.
I reckon there is no need for Columbo or Sherlock to solve this whodunit. There is plenty of silliness as our cyberstalker can hack into and control traffic lights for example. Still Lifetime know which audience to aim their films at, its female friendly with enough thrills to keep you mildly entertained.
This is a terrible movie. I watch a lot of movies and this one has no real life base.
It's one thing to try and scare people into being careful, but it's another to totally shield the audience from reality.
The cinematography is totally horrible. I am still not sure what Lifetime Channel had hoped to achieve form this movie.
Even the leading actress is working half way - - at no point do we see her authentic self.
Was it the company? The production? or the writers?
I have no clue. But I feel like I want my dollar back from red-box (it was that bad).
It's one thing to try and scare people into being careful, but it's another to totally shield the audience from reality.
The cinematography is totally horrible. I am still not sure what Lifetime Channel had hoped to achieve form this movie.
Even the leading actress is working half way - - at no point do we see her authentic self.
Was it the company? The production? or the writers?
I have no clue. But I feel like I want my dollar back from red-box (it was that bad).
...they telegraphed who the bad guy was. I mean, the instant the person appeared on screen, I knew it was the killer/stalker. That ruined any sense of suspense the movie could have had. So there was nothing else to keep my interest after that. It was especially bad since it happened relatively early in the film.
The technique of always hiding the bad guys' face throughout the movie just affirmed who it was. That was just very poor writing.
Another reviewer here said "The filmmakers kept the audience guessing about his identity". meaning the identity of the bad guy. Are you kidding me? Anyone who didn't know who the bad guy was as soon as they appeared should be ashamed of themselves. Judging by the number of high ratings in some of the reviews here, lots of people share that shame.
The technique of always hiding the bad guys' face throughout the movie just affirmed who it was. That was just very poor writing.
Another reviewer here said "The filmmakers kept the audience guessing about his identity". meaning the identity of the bad guy. Are you kidding me? Anyone who didn't know who the bad guy was as soon as they appeared should be ashamed of themselves. Judging by the number of high ratings in some of the reviews here, lots of people share that shame.
It is nice. Just nice because it is the good choice after a work day. Three things are good in its case- the splendid predictability- you know the hustler too easy, Mischa Burton and, maybe, the smile and pectorals of Marco grazzini. Low budget, not high ambitions, a comfortable story, absurde, full of cliches, decent. And it is enough for see it out of expectations.
Did you know
- GoofsWhen Dayton pulled up the files on his computer showing the personal information of both Paul Rogers and Detective John Bonham, the personal and business phone numbers in each file were exactly the same.
- How long is Cyberstalker?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $1,800,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content