Cut!

It's rare I find a thriller/horror film that wraps me in and keeps me enticed. CUT! brings you a clever, smart, witty and entertaining horror flick that will leave you guessing all the way through. Brilliant performance from David Banks in the lead and David Rountree is equally as captivating. Rountree leaves an impressive directorial mark with excellent casting and superb performances. Locations, shot selection, and scene choices came together very well allowing the story to unfold with a stylistic classy touch. The score and post effects were spot on and we all know so much of a good horror flick relies on great audio. CUT! shows you that amazing work can be done with the right people, the right attitude, the right planning and a little bit of capitol.

At first glance - a normal low-budget film in a genre almost-Horror. But I do not recommend, based on a stupid and primitive violence. In addition, if the horror is not scary, it is disgusting and it is already - not really a horror film. The plot is almost non-existent in it, the script is sucked from the finger.

What could be a plus, namely the ability to be rented for $ 300 a film turned out to be a minus. The movie was filmed in such a way, that is not much interested in the viewer .. NOT intriguing nothing at all, except to inflict physical harm or kill someone. What makes this creation, disgusting product, but unbecoming to view. Degraded- layer emulsion.

The director, of course, has its own style *, but the potential for its development is limited to primitive violence, because he * only on this reasonable. The very same film about mediocrity persons, who do not make sense as shooting is not something that horror, and anything at all, and doing terrible things on the way to his 1st movie - this is their horror, in fact about the film itself.

Cut so that with a certain probability may be able to tighten the film fans, until the end of viewing, but The usual bold viewer will want to turn off after 5 + minute (if not sooner, then later)

I opened an IMDb account especially to warn people from this waste of time.

All the rest of the reviews are by the cast and makers of the film. Actually calling it a film is doing the cinema wrong, it really is more like a student film. A bad, long, boring student film you just wished you haven't watched.

If you love the Horror Genre, I invite you to write an honest review as well (after trying to see the movie of course) just so other fans wouldn't have to go through the disappointment of finding out this movie's rating (7.4 at the time this review was written) is misleading.

I didn't manage to get through the first half an hour. Those who can, please contact your doctor. You have Alzheimer.

I felt ashamed by the end of the movie. I thought the actors were doing a spoof of terrible indie movies. This one wanted to be a horror movie, but I can only see it scaring a timid 8 year old in 1991. Such horrible acting and a script that is just so awful make this a very painful experience to sit through. I felt as though I was marking a student's film that they did in lieu of a thesis.

Nobody is convincing. Black guy is not scary just because he is black. Prostitutes from Degrassi Jr High. Lead actors are terribly ugly and really deserved a good scalping. I will bring my score up to 5/10 if it's revealed that the cast really did all die in real life.

This movie is really bad. The high points probably comes from cast and crew conducting some sort of pre-internet-release internet-campaign. Kudos to them and well done. You fooled me!

The acting is pretty bad, the editing is actually okay but the script/story and directing is just infantile. It's like a less-than-bright adolescent wrote the script, trying to sort of copy the gist of other horror movies, not paying any attention to details or believability of characters or story-progression. It's just a big mess, to sum it up in one sentence. The music was really good though... but probably because it was taken from Stanley Kubrick's Full Metal Jacket.