Assassin's Creed III

Being a huge fan of the Assassins creed games I walked into this so darn hyped and gee am I glad it wasn't all a waste( unlike you Resident Evil 6) Though the game does start off a bit slow and mainly full of cut scenes with double click "A" for a block etc., etc., but after a few of the sequences passed and we finished Haytham's campaign and went into Connors campaign the game sped up so much and Im glad it did cause I would have been hyped for no reason and we don't like that now do we.

Even though there are a few problems with the editing which they definitely should have improved a bit more and I think they were just in a rush to get this out before the holiday season. If yo were just to play AC3 just for the story you are stupid the gameplay in this isn't tha best but it certainly is better than most games that come out. 8/10

Where to start really? Ubisoft Montreal just keeps getting better and better.Assassin's Creed III has been crafted very sincerely. Each and every cut scenes are well acted.This game is superior to it's predecessor in terms of gameplay length,story, game world, character building etc.The frontier is gorgeous, so are the cities. And for the first time there is epilogue gameplay. The fighting mechanics are more brutal and more fluid than ever, and the parkour has been improved. Although Jasper Kyd(Composer)from previous games was missing, Lorne Balfe did an amazing job with the soundtrack. I was looking forward to this Connor guy,and I must say he is SERIOUS(Like Altair). Mission variation is awesome. This is a must buy.

I do not normally review movies or games. But I felt i had to with this one.

For a start, it does not feel like a game. I think about 70% is just video and story. Not bad when you are watching a movie, but a bit crap when you are playing a game.

Loved the last few Assassins creed. But when I get a game that takes 3 hours just to get the assassins gear then I have to ask some questions.

I had to watch and play 20mins of hide and seek with some kids before I got to that point. I hate to say it.. But, Really??!

The graphics were awesome, the story was great. The gameplay was good, for what gameplay there was in the game.

Sorry. Just very disappointed. Any agree?

I've played AC:III through three times, almost all the characters are great, and I liked the size and missions on the homestead as well as on the frontier. Living through Connor during the revolution is such a fun experience, and you have so much fun doing it too. New ways to kill enemies are fun and creative; against unpopular opinion, I liked rope darts because I just thought they were fun to use, especially if you were perched in a tree and assassinated an enemy below with it, it would hang the enemy so I thought that was new and cool. The only reason this isn't getting a 10/10 is because the main character Connor is a stale piece of paper. The amount of times you hear him say "what would you have me do?" gets very annoying but the game and atmosphere makes up for it.

Despite the fact that this game is rather old at this point it holds up surprisingly well went back and replayed it recently I was expecting to be disappointed after this long but the story is still quite good graphics are not too bad and characters are in depth and feel real as I remember from before