McAfee: Des virus aux démons
Original title: Running with the Devil: The Wild World of John McAfee
IMDb RATING
5.9/10
4.1K
YOUR RATING
Life and death of software pioneer John McAfee who developed the software: McAfee Antivirus.Life and death of software pioneer John McAfee who developed the software: McAfee Antivirus.Life and death of software pioneer John McAfee who developed the software: McAfee Antivirus.
- Awards
- 1 nomination total
Featured reviews
"Running with the Devil: The Wild World of John McAfee" is the cinematic equivalent of a wild, bumpy ride on a rickety carnival attraction that you're not entirely sure has passed safety inspections. It's okay in the way that you leave the theater feeling slightly entertained but also like you might have been safer just watching paint dry. This documentary attempts to stitch together the chaotic tapestry that was McAfee's life, from antivirus pioneer to international man of mystery, and it does so with the subtlety of a sledgehammer at a glassblowing show.
Where this film hits the middle ground of mediocrity is its schizophrenic tone. One second, it's a tech thriller with all the cyber-panache of a 90s hacker movie; the next, it's a bizarre pseudo-philosophical ramble through the jungles of Belize. The filmmakers throw in everything but the kitchen sink, possibly believing that McAfee's eccentric life could only be matched by an equally erratic narrative style. This results in a viewing experience that is as disorienting as reading McAfee's own Twitter feed might have been-amusing yet perplexing, and you're not quite sure what to make of it all.
The documentary does manage to capture some genuinely intriguing moments that peel back the layers of McAfee's wild persona, giving glimpses into the man behind the media mask. However, these moments are fleeting, lost in a sea of over-the-top reenactments and interviews that range from enlightening to eyebrow-raising. It's a 3-star scramble that leaves you somewhat entertained but also a bit exhausted, like finishing a marathon through a hall of mirrors. In essence, it's perfectly okay-if okay means leaving the cinema as baffled as you were intrigued.
Where this film hits the middle ground of mediocrity is its schizophrenic tone. One second, it's a tech thriller with all the cyber-panache of a 90s hacker movie; the next, it's a bizarre pseudo-philosophical ramble through the jungles of Belize. The filmmakers throw in everything but the kitchen sink, possibly believing that McAfee's eccentric life could only be matched by an equally erratic narrative style. This results in a viewing experience that is as disorienting as reading McAfee's own Twitter feed might have been-amusing yet perplexing, and you're not quite sure what to make of it all.
The documentary does manage to capture some genuinely intriguing moments that peel back the layers of McAfee's wild persona, giving glimpses into the man behind the media mask. However, these moments are fleeting, lost in a sea of over-the-top reenactments and interviews that range from enlightening to eyebrow-raising. It's a 3-star scramble that leaves you somewhat entertained but also a bit exhausted, like finishing a marathon through a hall of mirrors. In essence, it's perfectly okay-if okay means leaving the cinema as baffled as you were intrigued.
The majority of this documentary is focused on a Vice reporter and photographer and not on John McAfee. It barely covers his legitimate career in software, the circumstances of the murder in Belize he is suspected of and provides nothing insightful about his death in Spain. It's laughable the amount of interviews they have with the Vice guys. I mean who cares what these two idiots have to say. Do yourself a favor and read his Wikipedia page if you are curious and skip this so called documentary.
This is not one of those documentaries that if you just stick with it, will eventually makes sense or get better.
It's just a bunch of crap footage they quickly patched together without putting in enough effort to make it flow logically. It's hard to believe that the majority of footage used was shot by a professional. It was way too long for the very narrow focus they presented. The snippets of the ghostwriter were interesting, but completely out of place. He probably wasn't too happy to see the end product he contributed to.
The final scene with the girlfriend was just insulting to the audience. Then again, for those of us dumb enough to sit through the entire thing we probably deserved it.
Done correctly, this could've been an interesting and entertaining documentary.
It's just a bunch of crap footage they quickly patched together without putting in enough effort to make it flow logically. It's hard to believe that the majority of footage used was shot by a professional. It was way too long for the very narrow focus they presented. The snippets of the ghostwriter were interesting, but completely out of place. He probably wasn't too happy to see the end product he contributed to.
The final scene with the girlfriend was just insulting to the audience. Then again, for those of us dumb enough to sit through the entire thing we probably deserved it.
Done correctly, this could've been an interesting and entertaining documentary.
I would have liked to see the documentary they were making with decent editing and camera work (looks like a child filmed this). Instead I saw tiresome mess consisting of more interviews of the makers of the document, than interviews of McAfee.
The basis for any decent documentary is that statements are checked and verified.
Well, this documentary does none of that. It just tells a story from one side in the hope that you believe it. Or at least to see what sticks to the wall. Because a lot of "facts" are thrown at the viewer that could have easily been checked with some authorities.
Why didn't they contact for instance the authorities of Belize to see what is true. Why wasn't the SEC or even the IRS asked for their opinion?! And since this is VICE - whom makes quite some documentaries on cartels - why didn't they also asked the Sinaloa cartel for their opinion.
What also would have been possible, is to have asked some security software experts to see what could have been true of McAfee's statements. How on earth could McAfee have keystroke software in computers of cartels, the U. S. government or the Belize government.
Is there not a mental illness that makes the patient believe that he is being observed and chased by the government?! So for all we know, McAfee was mentally ill?!
I find the documentary therefore a show of bad journalism. The content is though somewhat entertaining to watch. But I get the impression that is was watching more fiction than fact.
Well, this documentary does none of that. It just tells a story from one side in the hope that you believe it. Or at least to see what sticks to the wall. Because a lot of "facts" are thrown at the viewer that could have easily been checked with some authorities.
Why didn't they contact for instance the authorities of Belize to see what is true. Why wasn't the SEC or even the IRS asked for their opinion?! And since this is VICE - whom makes quite some documentaries on cartels - why didn't they also asked the Sinaloa cartel for their opinion.
What also would have been possible, is to have asked some security software experts to see what could have been true of McAfee's statements. How on earth could McAfee have keystroke software in computers of cartels, the U. S. government or the Belize government.
Is there not a mental illness that makes the patient believe that he is being observed and chased by the government?! So for all we know, McAfee was mentally ill?!
I find the documentary therefore a show of bad journalism. The content is though somewhat entertaining to watch. But I get the impression that is was watching more fiction than fact.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Running with the Devil: The Wild World of John McAfee
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 45m(105 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content