An unknown disease wipes out most of the population and a man is isolated for study. Fearing for his wife's safety, he breaks quarantine.An unknown disease wipes out most of the population and a man is isolated for study. Fearing for his wife's safety, he breaks quarantine.An unknown disease wipes out most of the population and a man is isolated for study. Fearing for his wife's safety, he breaks quarantine.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Right, well I was lured into watching the 2022 thriller "Eradication" given the movie's interesting cover/poster. And the synopsis had some appeal to it as well. Sure, I had never even heard about this movie from writers Harry Aspinwall and Daniel Byers prior to sitting down to watch it.
The storyline in "Eradication", as written by Harry Aspinwall and Daniel Byers, is slow paced. So very, very slow paced. Believe me when I say that virtually nothing happens throughout the 87 minutes that the movie runs for. So director Daniel Byers didn't exactly manage to deliver a wholesome movie experience here. And truth be told, I had expected a bit more from the movie than what it turned out to be.
The acting in the movie was okay, but the cast were struggling with having a subpar script to work with. And given the setting of the movie, and the limited number of people on the screen, then the actors and actresses had to deliver more convincing performances in order to carry the movie, and they just weren't able to do so given the script - or lack thereof.
Visually then "Eradication" was okay. It was not a movie that used a whole lot of special effects, so you're not in for a particular impressive spectacle of visual effects.
While I managed to endure all 87 minutes of "Eradication", then I wasn't entertained. So why stick around? Well, I was hoping that the movie would pick up, that director Daniel Byers would surprise the audience with something. But it just never happened. And thus I can in all honesty say that this is not a movie that I will ever return to watch, nor is it a movie that I would recommend you to waste your time, money or effort on.
Sadly, the movie's cover/poster was actually the best thing about the entire ordeal.
My rating of "Eradication" lands on a two out of ten stars.
The storyline in "Eradication", as written by Harry Aspinwall and Daniel Byers, is slow paced. So very, very slow paced. Believe me when I say that virtually nothing happens throughout the 87 minutes that the movie runs for. So director Daniel Byers didn't exactly manage to deliver a wholesome movie experience here. And truth be told, I had expected a bit more from the movie than what it turned out to be.
The acting in the movie was okay, but the cast were struggling with having a subpar script to work with. And given the setting of the movie, and the limited number of people on the screen, then the actors and actresses had to deliver more convincing performances in order to carry the movie, and they just weren't able to do so given the script - or lack thereof.
Visually then "Eradication" was okay. It was not a movie that used a whole lot of special effects, so you're not in for a particular impressive spectacle of visual effects.
While I managed to endure all 87 minutes of "Eradication", then I wasn't entertained. So why stick around? Well, I was hoping that the movie would pick up, that director Daniel Byers would surprise the audience with something. But it just never happened. And thus I can in all honesty say that this is not a movie that I will ever return to watch, nor is it a movie that I would recommend you to waste your time, money or effort on.
Sadly, the movie's cover/poster was actually the best thing about the entire ordeal.
My rating of "Eradication" lands on a two out of ten stars.
It is a B-level movie but close to A-level. I enjoyed it, and I'm skeptical of every movie. I hope Tubi produces more movies. It's shot well with camera angles, very well lit - beautiful cinematography. It has decent acting - the main actor does a good job in the role he's supposed to play - that's a tough character to act. It's edited well - better than most b-level sci-fi (or non-fiction) movies. The pacing is perfect. The story is creative for a pandemic movie. Brilliant story as well.
Bravo. The story keeps you entertained to the end. And I appreciate the homages to other movies - I think you'll appreciate them as well.
Bravo. The story keeps you entertained to the end. And I appreciate the homages to other movies - I think you'll appreciate them as well.
Thats it.
A man in a house in a forest.
Something about a virus.
Then just an egg timer for the rest of the film going off every minute or two.
Atrociously bad.
Stay away at all costs.
Only way it could be worse if it was a baby crying for the rest of the film instead of the egg timer.
If it was any slower paced it would have been dead on arrival. If it was any more pointless it would be a beach ball.
Someone should have slapped the director/writer in the face early on.
Who would want to listen to an egg timer go off every minute for an hour and a half?
Its incredible. So bad its unbelievable, might go down in history as the next 'The Room' - but far far more annoying.
A man in a house in a forest.
Something about a virus.
Then just an egg timer for the rest of the film going off every minute or two.
Atrociously bad.
Stay away at all costs.
Only way it could be worse if it was a baby crying for the rest of the film instead of the egg timer.
If it was any slower paced it would have been dead on arrival. If it was any more pointless it would be a beach ball.
Someone should have slapped the director/writer in the face early on.
Who would want to listen to an egg timer go off every minute for an hour and a half?
Its incredible. So bad its unbelievable, might go down in history as the next 'The Room' - but far far more annoying.
This film is so incredibly slow paced. It takes an hour for anything interesting to happen. Even then, none of it makes logical sense, just so poorly written, I'm not expecting a masterpiece of cinema but it has a really bad storyline with no real direction or explanation. He refuses to listen to his wife who is apparently a scientist - thinking he knows better. I'm not going to spoil if for anyone who makes the poor life choice to actually put themselves through watching this. It's an hour and a half of my life that I'll never get back.
The acting is poor and the storyline and character development is shaky at best, you're genuinely best not wasting your time.
I'd have turned it off after less than an hour but given the length of the film and the sunken cost of my time.
The ending is atrocious as well. There's a weird obsession with drones in the film too.
The acting is poor and the storyline and character development is shaky at best, you're genuinely best not wasting your time.
I'd have turned it off after less than an hour but given the length of the film and the sunken cost of my time.
The ending is atrocious as well. There's a weird obsession with drones in the film too.
There is no electricity, but the computer never gets turned off. Where does the drinking water come from? Then it gets even more imposable or just plain stupid. Don't waste your time on this, the concept could have been good, but with most of these movies lately no one is fact checking the details. I can NOT recommend this.
Did you know
- TriviaThe location David leaves in the telephone message (54 minutes in): 44 5 15 74 5 30 is located in Kazakhstan
- ConnectionsReferenced in Half in the Bag: The Kyle Gallner Triple Feature Spectacular! (2023)
- How long is Eradication?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime1 hour 27 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content